Another question that should be tested with a benchmarking procedure. However,
I doubt that even needing to update 50-100 fields would show much variation no
matter which technique you decided on. It would begin to matter if you had a
thousand windows open and several thousand fields, which is
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 5:42 AM, Peter M. Brigham pmb...@gmail.com wrote:
If you go with your initial solution, however, you have to use short ID
(the straight ID
contains more than one word), and you have to declare your global variables,
either at the
start of the script, or within each
On 7/26/13 1:38 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 5:42 AM, Peter M. Brigham pmb...@gmail.com wrote:
If you go with your initial solution, however, you have to use short ID (the straight
ID
contains more than one word), and you have to declare your global variables,
either at the
J. Landman Gay wrote:
Using ID is always the quickest way to access anything.
Why is that?
Mark, Monte - have you guys stumbled across how object references are
resolved in the code base?
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World
LiveCode training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com
On 27/07/2013, at 6:15 AM, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com wrote:
Using ID is always the quickest way to access anything.
Why is that?
Mark, Monte - have you guys stumbled across how object references are
resolved in the code base?
I haven't really looked into it but it makes
Monte Goulding wrote:
On 27/07/2013, at 6:15 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Using ID is always the quickest way to access anything.
Why is that?
Mark, Monte - have you guys stumbled across how object references
are resolved in the code base?
I haven't really looked into it but it makes
On 27/07/2013, at 6:38 AM, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com wrote:
Yes, I've always believed that name was the slowest option, but it's the
iteration that made me thinking that ordinal references would be at least as
fast, and possibly faster since the lookup is ordinal by nature
Monte Goulding wrote:
On 27/07/2013, at 6:38 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Yes, I've always believed that name was the slowest option, but
it's the iteration that made me thinking that ordinal references
would be at least as fast, and possibly faster since the lookup
is ordinal by nature anyway
On 27/07/2013, at 10:27 AM, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com wrote:
Monte Goulding wrote:
On 27/07/2013, at 6:38 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Yes, I've always believed that name was the slowest option, but
it's the iteration that made me thinking that ordinal references
would be
As my project moves along, it's handling remote updates of data and
displaying it live locally (watches for database updates).
I'm about to move on to making these live in multiple windows (i.e.,
the input window, and one or more output windows). This means that
the update code needs to quickly
10 matches
Mail list logo