Re: revHTTP

Hopefully the UX in DP9 will improve this issue. The drop-down menu for APIs will scroll if taller than the window height. On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Andre Garzia via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > Hey Monte, > > The built-in LC dictionary UI is not good. > For

Re: revHTTP

Thanks for your thoughts Andre > On 2 Aug 2017, at 8:48 am, Andre Garzia wrote: > > Yes, I can give more details, I am not talking about library documentation as > it is generated by lcdoc but the overall state of the documentation. The main > issue for me is a UX one.

Re: revHTTP

> On 2 Aug 2017, at 8:57 am, Andre Garzia via use-livecode > wrote: > > I just looked at the source code for the new httpd library, it is quite > similar in "what it is doing" to mchttpd and my own revhttpd. Basically > both of them use LC to accept and process

Re: revHTTP

Thats how I feel too :-) Em 1 de ago de 2017 20:04, "J. Landman Gay via use-livecode" < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> escreveu: > On 8/1/17 5:48 PM, Andre Garzia via use-livecode wrote: > >> Right now we have documentation spread all over the place. There are >> things >> in release notes,

Re: revHTTP

On 8/1/17 5:48 PM, Andre Garzia via use-livecode wrote: Right now we have documentation spread all over the place. There are things in release notes, things in emails, stuff in the dictionary, stuff only on the website, and finding things is quite hard. I read the release notes with every new

Re: revHTTP

On 08/01/2017 03:48 PM, Andre Garzia via use-livecode wrote: Right now we have documentation spread all over the place. There are things in release notes, things in emails, stuff in the dictionary, stuff only on the website, and finding things is quite hard. The navigation is challenging, for

Re: revHTTP

Friends, I just looked at the source code for the new httpd library, it is quite similar in "what it is doing" to mchttpd and my own revhttpd. Basically both of them use LC to accept and process requests. I had the impression that the new library was using some C/C++ based implementation. The

Re: revHTTP

Hey Monte, Yes, I can give more details, I am not talking about library documentation as it is generated by lcdoc but the overall state of the documentation. The main issue for me is a UX one. The built-in LC dictionary UI is not good. For example, on my Surface 4 Pro, I can't change the little

Re: revHTTP

On 31/07/2017 21:18, Monte Goulding via use-livecode wrote: Hi Alex You could use the new httpd library that is already included in LiveCode 9 for this. Indeed this is what it was created for. We build a standalone with all our tests and serve it with the library. Yep - found it, and now

Re: revHTTP

I have to admit, I had the same complaint as Andre - I didn't see anything about it in the dictionary. OK, now that I've looked harder, I see them :-) But I had no idea there was library documentation within the "API" drop-down. Brings up another question - I see there's a 'getopt' library

Re: revHTTP

anyone have a copy of (or a currently working link to) Andre's revHTTP ? Thanks Alex P.S. I'm thinking of making a script-only stack that is a UI-free Simple HTTP server - and then suggesting to Livecode Ltd that the HTML5 deployment guide recommend it rather tha

Re: revHTTP

> On 2 Aug 2017, at 4:02 am, Andre Garzia via use-livecode > wrote: > > I wish there was a more comprehensive documentation effort going on. Hi Andre Can you give a little more detail on your complaint here. All our new libraries are documented with lcdoc

Re: revHTTP

use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > Does anyone have a copy of (or a currently working link to) Andre's > revHTTP ? > > Thanks > > Alex > > P.S. I'm thinking of making a script-only stack that is a UI-free Simple > HTTP server - and then suggesting to Livecode Ltd

Re: revHTTP

> On 1 Aug 2017, at 6:34 am, Matthias Rebbe via use-livecode > wrote: > > > it´s include in LC 9 DP7 and up. > > Please note that you have to manually load it with > start using stack "httpd" > > This is a known issue and was mentioned in the “Known issues” in

Re: revHTTP

ch the standalone in your browser. > > Cheers > > Monte > >> On 1 Aug 2017, at 5:22 am, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode >> <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com <mailto:use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>> wrote: >> >> Does anyone have a copy of (or a currently

Re: revHTTP

. That way the Test button would build and launch the standalone in your browser. Cheers Monte > On 1 Aug 2017, at 5:22 am, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode > <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > > Does anyone have a copy of (or a currently working link to) Andre's rev

Re: revHTTP

https://bitbucket.org/andregarzia/revonrockets/src/b4262227f94fd5b4efec828b3c0e88650e222e49/RevHTTP/?at=default <https://bitbucket.org/andregarzia/revonrockets/src/b4262227f94fd5b4efec828b3c0e88650e222e49/RevHTTP/?at=default> Matthias Rebbe +49 5741 31 ‌matthiasrebbe.eu

Re: revHTTP

Alex Tweedly wrote: > Does anyone have a copy of (or a currently working link to) Andre's > revHTTP ? Andre stopped work on that a long time ago, and I haven't seen it linked into his current site. I also made a fork of the original mchttpd, and here's a copy with minimal changes to

revHTTP

Does anyone have a copy of (or a currently working link to) Andre's revHTTP ? Thanks Alex P.S. I'm thinking of making a script-only stack that is a UI-free Simple HTTP server - and then suggesting to Livecode Ltd that the HTML5 deployment guide recommend it rather than the Python