Ralph-
Not that I'm doubting your findings, but those both seem mind-bogglingly
nonsensical to me. Can you post your test code?
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url
vec...@lists.runrev.com=from:%22hh+via+use%5C-livecode%22> Sat, 30
> Jun 2018 03:12:55 -0700<https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=use-
> livec...@lists.runrev.com=date:20180630> wrote:
>
>
> @Bernd
> Depending on the function an inline computation (as Alex denoted) may
ok i did.wanted to pass this along too
https://wordpress.org/plugins/software-license-manager/
On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 3:52 PM, Peter Bogdanoff via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> Yes, of course.
>
> bogdan...@me.com
>
> Peter
>
>
> > On Jun 30, 2018, at 12:23 PM,
Yes, of course.
bogdan...@me.com
Peter
> On Jun 30, 2018, at 12:23 PM, Tom Glod via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Woocommerce works awesome ..its a safe and sound decision. I almost did
> all that work, but the project did not go ahead.
>
> I checked out your website and i am quite interested
Kind regards
> Bernd
>
>
>
>
> hh via use-livecode<https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=use-
> livec...@lists.runrev.com=from:%22hh+via+use%5C-livecode%22> Sat, 30
> Jun 2018 03:12:55 -0700<https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=use-
> livec...@lists.runrev.com=date:2
Woocommerce works awesome ..its a safe and sound decision. I almost did
all that work, but the project did not go ahead.
I checked out your website and i am quite interested in what you are
building.
Can I send you a PM about your project?
On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 3:09 PM, Peter Bogdanoff via
Hi,
Has anyone integrated WooCommerce API Manager into Livecode?
I have a WooCommerce/WordPress website using WooCommerce Subscriptions. I want
to use issued serial keys from API Manager to activate my application and then
later have my application verify subscription currency when the app
-livecode@lists.runrev.com=date:20180630>
wrote:
@Bernd
Depending on the function an inline computation (as Alex denoted)
may be even faster than the private function calls?
Here, with IPv4 addresses, it is faster.
___
use-livecode mailing list
On 06/30/2018 10:34 AM, Jerry Jensen via use-livecode wrote:
And I read about bitor in the 9.0.0 dictionary: the operands are treated as
binary between 0 and a signed 32 bit integer (2^32 - 1) max. So bitor wouldn’t
do unless it has grown up into the 64 bit world.
that's a bit (or 32)
On 06/30/2018 10:27 AM, Paul Dupuis via use-livecode wrote:
I just looked back in dictionaries for older version back to 6.7.11 and
there are no shift operators in the dictionary. You have bitAnd, bitOr,
bitXor and botNot, but no shifts operators. Are you sure there were ever
in the language to
> On Jun 30, 2018, at 10:03 AM, Jerry Jensen via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
>
>> On Jun 30, 2018, at 8:00 AM, Mark Wieder via use-livecode
>> wrote:
>>
>> Indeed. I'm not too upset about the loss of the bitshift operators other
>> than the lack of backward compatibility, but I'm surprised by
On Jun 30, 2018, at 8:00 AM, Mark Wieder via use-livecode
wrote:
> Indeed. I'm not too upset about the loss of the bitshift operators other than
> the lack of backward compatibility, but I'm surprised by their demise. In
> terms of minimal use of microprocessor cycles I'd expect that the
On 06/30/2018 10:03 AM, Jerry Jensen via use-livecode wrote:
On Jun 30, 2018, at 8:00 AM, Mark Wieder via use-livecode
wrote:
Indeed. I'm not too upset about the loss of the bitshift operators other than
the lack of backward compatibility, but I'm surprised by their demise. In terms
of
> On Jun 30, 2018, at 8:00 AM, Mark Wieder via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Indeed. I'm not too upset about the loss of the bitshift operators other than
> the lack of backward compatibility, but I'm surprised by their demise. In
> terms of minimal use of microprocessor cycles I'd expect that
Here are some times on my system for comparison (10 random IPs):
216% - ip2dec: 463 ms
190% - ip2decpvt: 407 ms
171% - ip2dec2: 366 ms
147% - ip2dec2pvt: 314 ms
200% - sortIPList: 427 ms --> original from Bob
100% - sortIPList2: 215 ms --> Alex's inline with constants
152% - sortIPList3: 325
On 06/30/2018 03:50 AM, hh via use-livecode wrote:
Mark,
obviously you ask relating to Bob's IPv4 sort problem.
A perceptive observation, as always.
But when optimising (for speed) the connected formula
(1) a + b * 2^8 + c * 2^16 + d * 2^32
using the constants is slightly faster:
(2) a
Huh, back to the drawing board.
Thanks!
> On Jun 30, 2018, at 2:09 AM, hh via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> MouseMove works in HTML5 standalones, see for example
> http://hyperhh.de/html5/RGBPuzzle-8.0.2X.html
>
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
>
Mark,
obviously you ask relating to Bob's IPv4 sort problem.
But when optimising (for speed) the connected formula
(1) a + b * 2^8 + c * 2^16 + d * 2^32
using the constants is slightly faster:
(2) a + b * 256 + c * 65536 + d * 16777216
Why is the engine not handling the internal bitshifts
Remains to remark that the upcoming standard IPv6
with its text representations
(Section 2.2 of https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4291)
will require more detailed methods,
both for number base conversion and for item sorts/cosorts
(the items are hex numbers ...)
@Bernd
Depending on the function an
MouseMove works in HTML5 standalones, see for example
http://hyperhh.de/html5/RGBPuzzle-8.0.2X.html
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
if you replace ip2dec with the same functionality as Hermann's (HH) function
with
private function ip2dec2 x
set the itemdel to "."
return (item 4 of x) + (item 3 of x * 256) + (item 2 of x * 65536) + (item 1
of x * 16777216)
end ip2dec2
then the special sort via function is faster than
Marvellous.
Thank you very much indeed!
Richmond.
On 30/6/2018 3:26 am, hh via use-livecode wrote:
A simple hexagonal grid creating stack:
http://forums.livecode.com/viewtopic.php?p=168657#p168657
You choose the number of rows and columns and, for "scaling",
the horizontal radius and
22 matches
Mail list logo
