I paid to get listed the best part of a year ago (it seemed like a good idea
at the time). It was when they first announced it and before
http://livecode.com went live.
The process was (at that time) a conversation with Heather, and me putting
together about 100 words as a profile. I think the
Hi Al,
Are you saying that the exported PNG is of the correct size, e.g. 5x5 pixels? I
have to try that again.
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer
KvK: 50277553
Thanks for all the public and private messages of support. We are home now and
the funeral is tomorrow. Really touched today to get flowers today from the
RunRev team.
On 21/01/2014, at 7:12 AM, Monte Goulding mo...@sweattechnologies.com wrote:
Hi Folks
I'm going to be off the reservation
I am not sure if I could glean this from the current LC docs but it doesn't
look easy. Maybe someone here could give me a clue:
I have a desktop app which contains a field into which the user can type a
character string which is then manipulated by the app. The user can just use
the keyboard,
Monte,
Margaret and I send our love and prayers to Rebecca, you and your entire
family.
Ralph DiMola
IT Director
Evergreen Information Services
rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
-Original Message-
From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf
Of Monte Goulding
On 22/01/14 15:47, Graham Samuel wrote:
I am not sure if I could glean this from the current LC docs but it doesn't
look easy. Maybe someone here could give me a clue:
I have a desktop app which contains a field into which the user can type a
character string which is then manipulated by the
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Richmond richmondmathew...@gmail.comwrote:
So . . . I'm not being much help really.
We love you anyway, Richmond….
*--*
*Stephen Barncard - San Francisco Ca. USA - Deeds Not Words*
___
use-livecode mailing list
On 22/01/14 18:47, stephen barncard wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Richmond richmondmathew...@gmail.comwrote:
So . . . I'm not being much help really.
We love you anyway, Richmond….
I wonder who is going to love me if I suggest that the next release
might feature the capability
On 22 Jan 2014, at 16:55, Richmond richmondmathew...@gmail.com wrote:
I wonder who is going to love me if I suggest that the next release might
feature the capability of working out if a textFld contains
Unicode, ASCII, Macfunny, Windowsfunny, Amigafunny or otherwise?
In 7.0, text is
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Fraser Gordon fraser.gor...@runrev.comwrote:
In 7.0,
Any idea when we'll see the first V7 beta ?
(sorry, you opened the door….)
*--*
*Stephen Barncard - San Francisco Ca. USA - Deeds Not Words*
___
use-livecode
Just belted off a stack that WILL tell you if a textField contains
Unicode text or not; it's here:
http://forums.runrev.com/viewtopic.php?f=5t=18869
Love, Richmond.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to
On 22/01/14 19:12, stephen barncard wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Fraser Gordon fraser.gor...@runrev.comwrote:
In 7.0,
Any idea when we'll see the first V7 beta ?
(sorry, you opened the door….)
Stephen: you stole my wooden spoon; the one I use for stirring the
Fraser Gordon wrote:
In 7.0, text is always Unicode (specifically, UTF-16...)
Why UTF-16 rather than UTF-8?
The latter would seem more compact, and appears to be the default for
nearly every other dev tool (and text processors and so much more).
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World
LiveCode
On 22 Jan 2014, at 17:23, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com wrote:
Why UTF-16 rather than UTF-8?
Windows, OSX and iOS use UTF-16 in their native APIs. Android is (I believe)
UTF-8. Linux is usually UTF-8 but could technically be anything…
There are valid reasons for either choice but
Fraser Gordon wrote:
Windows, OSX and iOS use UTF-16 in their native APIs. Android is (I
believe) UTF-8. Linux is usually UTF-8 but could technically be
anything…
There are valid reasons for either choice but in the end it shouldn't
really matter to anyone who isn't fiddling with the
On 22/01/14 19:59, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Fraser Gordon wrote:
Windows, OSX and iOS use UTF-16 in their native APIs. Android is (I
believe) UTF-8. Linux is usually UTF-8 but could technically be
anything…
There are valid reasons for either choice but in the end it shouldn't
really matter
Dear List Members,
We are pleased to announce the release of LiveCode 6.5.2-rc-1.
This a maintenance release containing bug fixes only.
*Warning, there still may be bugs in this pre-release. It is always good
practice to back up your stacks before testing.*
*Release Contents*
33 bug fixes:
On 22/01/14 20:28, Benjamin Beaumont wrote:
Dear List Members,
We are pleased to announce the release of LiveCode 6.5.2-rc-1.
This a maintenance release containing bug fixes only.
*Warning, there still may be bugs in this pre-release. It is always good
practice to back up your stacks before
On 22/01/14 20:41, Graham Samuel wrote:
Richmond, thanks for inching my problem towards a solution. I downloaded your
test. Clever, in fact too clever for me. I don't understand why the test works.
Would you care to explain?
What the script in the button does is it grabs the text in the
Martin,
Please contact me from an e-mail address that is unrelated to Apple.
(Apple's servers currently don't accept e-mails from Economy-x-Talk and we
don't know where the problem is).
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage:
On 1/22/14, 12:28 PM, Benjamin Beaumont wrote:
11286 - messagebox syntax for invoking functions is broken
Oh yay! Double yay! It now works both with and without put. It was
making me crazy.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software |
On 1/22/14, 1:54 PM, Richmond wrote:
On 22/01/14 21:32, J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 1/22/14, 12:28 PM, Benjamin Beaumont wrote:
11286 - messagebox syntax for invoking functions is broken
Oh yay! Double yay! It now works both with and without put. It was
making me crazy.
Could you give us an
On 22/01/14 21:32, J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 1/22/14, 12:28 PM, Benjamin Beaumont wrote:
11286 - messagebox syntax for invoking functions is broken
Oh yay! Double yay! It now works both with and without put. It was
making me crazy.
Could you give us an example, please?
Richmond.
On 22/01/14 22:00, J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 1/22/14, 1:54 PM, Richmond wrote:
On 22/01/14 21:32, J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 1/22/14, 12:28 PM, Benjamin Beaumont wrote:
11286 - messagebox syntax for invoking functions is broken
Oh yay! Double yay! It now works both with and without put. It was
Funny thing: I went to backup my stack before testing so I can verify
bug 11623 is fixed, and the stable 6.5.1 crashed on me for the very first
time!
~Roger
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Benjamin Beaumont b...@runrev.com wrote:
Dear List Members,
We are pleased to announce the release
On 1/22/14, 2:06 PM, Richmond wrote:
So, presumably this only affects the Message Box; which is NOT the end
of the World as we know it.
Yes. The bug I mentioned was a fix to the message box, which I use to
call functions and handlers all the time. Not the end of the world, but
an
While reviewing some old scripts that have been in regular use but not
actually edited for some time I came across:
put .js after in jsfname
And was surprised it compiled but it does, it even works
on mouseUp
local tmp
put do into tmp
put what? after in tmp
put tmp
end mouseUp
##
Hi.
Right you are, and this (the dictionary does say that of is a synonym of
in) works as well.
on mouseUp
local tmp
put do into tmp
put what? after of of in in of in tmp -- !
put tmp
end mouseUp
Weird...
This is not at all possible with something like:
put woops onto into
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 12:26 PM, J. Landman Gay
jac...@hyperactivesw.comwrote:
an inconvenience to my work style
exactly - one can 'put' a complex single line term into the box, test it,
and paste into a script.
less editing and clicking.
it wasn't an intuitive or needed change. We weren't
Stephen.
it wasn't an intuitive or needed change. We weren't really warned.
Jacque was talking about the fact that it used to always work this way,
starting in 1987. It broke a few months ago.
Or maybe I misinterpreted your comment? Anyway, thank heavens it is back.
Craig
On 22/01/14 21:08, dunb...@aol.com wrote:
on mouseUp
local tmp
put do into tmp
put what? after of of in in of in tmp -- !
put tmp
end mouseUp
:D
Runrev anticipated my coding style apparently
Sadly unto is not supported :(
MArtin
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 1:15 PM, dunb...@aol.com wrote:
We weren't really warned
by the mother ship.
*--*
*Stephen Barncard - San Francisco Ca. USA - Deeds Not Words*
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url
Martin Baxter wrote:
Sadly unto is not supported :(
You might consider submitting a request for that.
See also:
http://quality.runrev.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3157
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World
LiveCode training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com
Webzine for LiveCode developers:
On 22/01/14 21:51, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Martin Baxter wrote:
Sadly unto is not supported :(
You might consider submitting a request for that.
It is... ...tempting
go unto stack Portentous
send myExFriend unto stack purgatori in 0 seconds
set the cursor unto watch [with theatrical
My thought exactly what with all the data shuffling among
apps/programs that goes on in modern computing
Tim Selander
Tokyo, Japan
On 14/01/23 2:23, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Fraser Gordon wrote:
In 7.0, text is always Unicode (specifically, UTF-16...)
Why UTF-16 rather than UTF-8?
Dear Developers!
I'm glad to release an early Developer Preview of rIDE 3.5. Please be
warned! It focuses on further integration
of features into the main window. The Tools Palette can now be showned as a
Pane together with the
Browser Tree and the new Message Box. These new features are
As this is the largest community of Mac users I know please forgive me for
asking this off topic question here.
I'm on 10.9.1 MBP 15 Retina, I have the latest versions of TextEdit 1.9
(310) and Pages 5.0.1 (1478)
I recently purchased OS X Mavericks - The Missing Manual as I find these
Missing
As this is the largest community of Mac users I know please forgive me for
asking this off topic question here.
I'm on 10.9.1 MBP 15 Retina, I have the latest versions of TextEdit 1.9
(310) and Pages 5.0.1 (1478)
I recently purchased OS X Mavericks - The Missing Manual as I find these
Missing
Jacque-
Wednesday, January 22, 2014, 11:32:15 AM, you wrote:
On 1/22/14, 12:28 PM, Benjamin Beaumont wrote:
11286 - messagebox syntax for invoking functions is broken
Oh yay! Double yay! It now works both with and without put. It was
making me crazy.
It's somewhat fixed. There's still an
I’m using 10.9.1 on a 13 inch MBP, and with TextEdit I never see that black
dot. I can type frantically and quit the app in mid keystroke, and still the
document had already saved the changes. Your symptoms suggest you’re not on
10.9.
___
On 1/22/14, 8:57 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Jacque-
Wednesday, January 22, 2014, 11:32:15 AM, you wrote:
On 1/22/14, 12:28 PM, Benjamin Beaumont wrote:
11286 - messagebox syntax for invoking functions is broken
Oh yay! Double yay! It now works both with and without put. It was
making me
Wonderful! :D
11675 - Application freezes when importing certain PBM image files
(All Unix formats now works! Just a small glitch with PBM easily to fix)
11673 - Setting the fillRule of a polygon graphic stops it rendering
Now, SVGL works as expected. Test by yourself!
42 matches
Mail list logo
