> BR wrote
> Now, if only we could layer objects on top. I'm seeing more and more apps now
> that are using this kind of effect as the background, they also use looping
> video - not animated gif, but actual video: short small looping clips that
> run behind/ underneath a scrolling group of buttons
On 3/19/17 10:03 PM, dunbarx via use-livecode wrote:
I actually never tried using a stack as a menu. So I just did. But in both
v6.7 and 8.1.3, if I create and name a new stack, add a single button to it,
and set the "menuName" of the button to the stack name, as soon as I click
on the button, LC
Hmm, this is odd if you are located in North Carolina…it means your server is
off shore, out in the Atlantic, because it is running 3 hours ahead of you.
but, unless HostM has now floatilla ISP data center ships, or secret bunkers on
the sea floor, something is amiss.
Ditto everything Richard a
Jacque.
I actually never tried using a stack as a menu. So I just did. But in both
v6.7 and 8.1.3, if I create and name a new stack, add a single button to it,
and set the "menuName" of the button to the stack name, as soon as I click
on the button, LC crashes and quits.
Was it something I said?
HH you are wonderful! thanks for this contribution. I see someone we know in
the cast of characters in the slide show, and I think some eleocarpus fruits
(blue Rudraksha) from our place here.
How great to see Wilhelm Sanke too.
Now, if only we could layer objects on top. I'm seeing more and m
"I suspect that Craig didn't know that stacks can be menus. "
I did, but did not connect those dots. And as you say, I also do not know
how to add a scrollbar to a stack.
But a kluge ought to be doable. I will play around for a bit.
Craig
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revol
Ah.
Have tried to set the size, top or bottom of the stack window to accommodate?
This should be easy to manage based on the parameters of your selection
gadgetry. I am not quite clear how you are selecting the various buttons, but a
single handler in the card script ought to suffice.
Craig
On 3/19/17 8:22 PM, Dan Friedman via use-livecode wrote:
Craig,
It’s that the stack this is acting as the menu is higher (taller)
than the screen. So, the bottom of the stack is below the bottom of
the screen. Can’t scroll the menu (the stack) to see or select the
button that are out of view.
On 3/19/17 7:23 PM, Alejandro Tejada via use-livecode wrote:
How could I resize the visible boundary of a group
(with many controls) to show only the rectangle of
the clicked control?
Try setting the group's boundingRect to the rect of the control, then
setting the rect of the group.
--
Jacq
Craig,
It’s that the stack this is acting as the menu is higher (taller) than the
screen. So, the bottom of the stack is below the bottom of the screen. Can’t
scroll the menu (the stack) to see or select the button that are out of view.
Hope that makes sense.
-Dan
When you shrink the group, it does indeed move things around, so you'll
need to do the math to adjust the vscroll and hscroll. Something like
this..
*set* the hscroll of me to the hscroll of me -(the left of me - the left of
the target )
*set* the vscroll of me to the vscroll of me -( the top of
Hi.
Untested, but something like:
set the rect of grp "yourGroup" to the rect of control
"yourControlToShrinkTo"
Craig Newman
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Changing-a-group-visible-boundaries-by-script-tp4713184p4713186.html
Sent from the Rev
I almost know what you are seeing, but not quite.
Is it a menu-style button that is in question? Or some other control, like a
scrolling table field? And do you mean that the "top" of the stack is above
the "top" of the screen? Please explain.
Craig Newman
--
View this message in context:
htt
Hi All,
How could I resize the visible boundary of a group
(with many controls) to show only the rectangle of
the clicked control?
For example, in a new stack create 3 or 4 controls
(buttons, fields, images or graphics) and group them.
Using the pointer tool change the size of the visible
bounda
I just put the beta version of Augmented Earth on my website. My wife
downloaded and installed it. When she got to the map group, it would not
display the map. Instead it gets a page saying "your browser does not
support WebGL".
This seems rather odd to me. As I understand it, the browser widget u
Greetings! I have created a stack with a column of buttons and set it’s name
to the menuName of a button. It’s popuping up perfectly except that if the
height of the stack is highter than the screen, it doesn’t scroll with the
mouse as a normal menu does. I tried grouping the buttons and ad
Hi Richmond,
on Sun, 19 Mar 2017, Richmond Mathewson wrote:
> This just echos what LiveCode have been doing
> for a long, long time, and I get slammed every time
> I mention it: They talk "the talk" about FOSS, 'Community'
> and so on, and listen when it suits them, but don't when it doesn't.
I
Today I started a new collection, hope some of you come in with "LC-specials".
This demo shall show that you need nothing more than a browser widget and a
set of image files located locally (e.g. in tmp-folder from stack resources)
or from a server in order to have a HQ Ken-Burns-effect show -- ju
Yes I agree wholeheartedly with Johnathan -
I once (maybe five years ago) wanted to use ImageMagick but was put off, partly
because I wanted to put it into a commercial product and couldn’t understanding
the licensing rules: in particular, it seemed that I had to give all my users
(purchasers)
> Jonathan L. wrote:
> It would be amazing if the LC folks created an ImageMagick wrapper so that
> we could use it as an external or widget!
There is a Java interface (JMagick, see
https://www.imagemagick.org/script/api.php)
and the brand-new LiveCode FFI for Java.
> If you can find a Javascrip
This just echos what LiveCode have been doing for a long, long time, and
I get
slammed every time I mention it:
They talk "the talk" about FOSS, 'Community' and so on, and listen
when it suits them, but don't when it doesn't.
They show every sign of pushing LiveCode in a direction which wll
ex
Because the LiveCode people have removed a link to the downloads page
because
they want to force you to submit a e-mail address. I mentioned this in
an earlier posting and expressed
my opinion that this was not a good idea at all.
Go here: http://downloads.livecode.com/livecode/
Richmond.
On
22 matches
Mail list logo
