I just put the PHP on my server and it was able to handle the randombytes IV
without issue.
The demo does not generate a new IV for the returned data which it really
should in production.
From a security perspective, you assume that an attacker has access to the
code. From the encrypted messag
I’ll volunteer to add it to my community repo if desired.
Thanks,
Brian
On Jul 3, 2018, 2:17 PM -0400, Tom Glod via use-livecode
, wrote:
> any chance this could go on github?
>
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit th
I think the IV vulnerability that I’m talking about is more theoretical than an
actual concern. From what I’ve read the attacker needs to be able to
control/influence what is being encrypted for knowledge of the next IV to help
(so they can use a known plain text to test their key hypothesis).
very helpful to a lot of livecode developers.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Brian Milby via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> > I think the IV vulnerability that I’m talking about is more theoretical
> > than an actual conc
The problem is that with a known IV and the code, the next IV can be
predicted if using the random function. If the generator was reseeded every
time an IV was generated, that would remove the advance prediction issue. I
didn't mean that the first IV could be guessed. Exploitation would be
diffic
There is not currently a library available that does what you want. With
LCB, you could package your own. There are a couple of packages with code
that interfaces with USB deices, but I don't know enough about Android to
build them in a way that works with LCB.
Here are a couple:
https://github.
I've finally updated my online version of the dictionary to the LC 9.0
release. In the process, I've posted the stack to my GitHub repo.
https://github.com/bwmilby/lc-misc/tree/master/WebDocMaker
The dictionary is available at:
https://milby.us/lc/docs/api.html
The guides are available at:
http
t;
> Michel F. Lukawecki
> Longueuil, Canada
>
> > On 2018-Jul-4, at 19:00, Brian Milby via use-livecode
> > wrote:
> >
> > I've finally updated my online version of the dictionary to the LC 9.0
> > release. In the process, I've post
Is it possible that multiple overlapping messages are being spawned?
You mention that the checks happen every 250ms... are you doing a send in time
at the end of the check or at the start?
Thanks,
Brian
On Jul 7, 2018, 7:21 PM -0400, Tom Glod via use-livecode
, wrote:
> So i've been watching th
Pulling the fullclipboarddata could end up doing a bit of work depending on
what is on it. You would probably be better off using the rawclipboarddata to
avoid LC doing any processing just so you can detect changes.
Under normal circumstances, the various flavors of content will reflect the
sam
Wondering if a widget would work for this. The tree widget doesn’t to a great
job with extremely large data sets though.
Thanks,
Brian
On Jul 11, 2018, 10:22 PM -0500, Tom Glod via use-livecode
, wrote:
> Update on this .. I'm coming to realize that dg isn't going to cut it
> for my needs in
And don't forget that the last piece of the AR improvement hasn't landed
yet which will also improve DG performance.
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:14 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> Tom Glod wrote:
>
> > Update on this .. I'm coming to realize that
I have a question/small favor to ask someone that develops on Android.
When you place a browser widget on a stack and deploy to iOS, the content
inside the widget is always at native resolution. If you use a resize
handler or the GM to position the rect and a FullScreenMode of noScale,
everything
> fullescreenMode (in portrait,) remnants of the previous layout were visible
> underneath the new layout.
>
> More instruction would be good, feel free to write me privately. I didn't
> examine the scripts.
>
>
> On 7/15/18 10:04 AM, Brian Milby via use-livecode wrote:
It is all about input validation. Access to a SQL server is reasonable. Access
to the shell is something that probably should be avoided. In either case you
need to be sure the user/hacker cannot send requests that you do not allow.
Thanks,
Brian
On Jul 16, 2018, 9:51 AM -0500, Bob Sneidar via u
I can't do the testing right now, but I think that your "portrainUI"
handler is causing the issue. In there you restrict the orientations to
portrait only. If you are doing that to force the device to rotate, you
probably need to add another one at the end that unlocks the device so that
it can b
It is much more simple... it is up to the app author. If they don’t want you to
display on an external screen they disable the ability.
I have my internet through the cable company. They have an app that shows live
local stations. They don’t allow it to be shown on a big screen unless you
subsc
Check out “before” and “after” in the dictionary (control structure). They
allow what you are wanting.
On Jul 20, 2018, 1:44 PM -0500, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
, wrote:
> I believe I may have mispoken in this thread. Setting the behavior of an
> object does NOT insert the behavior script in
I just tried a simple test. I created a stack, added a DG and a button. I
used the example at the top of this thread to set the behavior. I then
added another DG to the card. Now when I double click on either DG, the
new behavior is used. Is that what you are seeing and what you are
intending?
It is not a bug. You can't save a behavior on a script only stack, they
much be added after they loaded. There is a new syntax to make it
automatic, but that wouldn't help here.
In the IDE, enable "Show IDE stacks in lists", open the Project Browser.
Find revdatagridlibrarybehaviorsdatagridbutto
@Richard,
That is precisely what I saw when I did my test. (And DG3 was in a
different stack.)
I tried manually replacing the old button with one in the stack and that
completely broke the DG.
@Bob
Another option to get script in front of the library would be to set the
script of:
button id 1005
>From the object menu, select place group.
It can be done in code if you have too many to do by hand.
On Jul 21, 2018, 8:32 AM -0500, Tom Glod via use-livecode
, wrote:
> Hi Folks, I failed to think my stack through ahead of time and forgot to
> add a shared group to my first card before I made th
Doing a little digging on this.
I'm pretty sure this impacts iOS in the same was as MacOS.
private command __revSBCopyFolder
User and group is copied if MacOS, but not Linux
private command __revSBCopyFile
Probably good that links are handled as files, because they technically are.
Prior to lin
e-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> Brian,
>
> I can definitely test it out. I wouldn’t worry about symbolic links outside
> the folder right now. I don’t believe it affects .frameworks.
>
> --
> Trevor DeVore
>
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 10:24 AM Bria
Found something very interesting and I think it may be a bug (at least an
anomaly)...
if you rename a symbolic link to a folder, the folder that is pointed to is
renamed vice the link
consider the following (-> denotes a symbolic link)
~/tmp/
~/tmp2 -> ./tmp/
rename "~/tmp2" "~/tmp3"
results in
PR 6611 created for this issue on develop-9.0
https://github.com/livecode/livecode/pull/6611
The submitted change will preserve symbolic links. Relative links that go
outside of the included directory will probably break. Absolute links may
not work on other machines. All framework links should
So that is something that could be fixed pretty easily. I’m thinking a script
local to store the value which will offset the additional work to figure it out
the first time.
Logic would be to check for some key object and if not found then move up the
behavior chain a level and look. Could eith
I built a time tracking app that had the same type of persistence requirement.
I used a text file for the data store. Each time any field had a change, the
data was saved again. When loading the app it would import the current data.
Data was only cleared on request (and I would only allow that a
What OS are you using? It will be inside the IDE, but will get copied into your
app as well. You will probably need admin rights to edit. I would do it in an
external editor too.
It probably would be an enhancement request (therefore 9.1), but I would be
happy to submit a PR against a BZ report
Here is my slight modification to the suggestion:
local sResourceStack
private function _ResourceStack
local theStack, theCharNo
if sResourceStack is empty then
put the behavior of me into theStack
repeat
if trueWord -1 of theStack is "revDataGridLibrary" or theStack i
ls/Toolset/palettes/revdatagridlibrary/behaviorsdatagridbuttonbehavior.livecodescript"
> 573,188,1,_Initialize
>
> I'll poke around later.
>
> Bob S
>
>
> > On Jul 23, 2018, at 22:12 , Brian Milby via use-livecode
> > wrote:
> >
> > local sResourceStac
old behavior
> button, the datagrid now works! You guys are freaking geniuses!
>
> Bob S
>
>
> > On Jul 24, 2018, at 07:57 , Brian Milby via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> >
> > I’ll put something together tonight. The code in the libr
Posted a demo stack showing a DG with a behavior button in front of the DG
library behavior.
https://github.com/bwmilby/lc-misc/tree/master/NestedDGBehavior
There is an image of the stack uploaded as well. The preOpenStack handler
will update the script (LC9) which will then be available until LC
communities and their spirit of
> sharing and mutual support. We seem to be the last bastion.
>
> Bob S
>
>
> > On Jul 24, 2018, at 16:31 , Brian Milby via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> >
> > PR submitted on Bug 21427.
> > http
Use case is a major driver though. If you have no need to hand edit a
file, then LSON is an efficient and easy way to store the data. It also
has the benefit of being able to easily store binary data if needed.
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 5:40 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists
Last migration that I had was pretty seamless. They migrated everything to a
new VPS for me to check out before flipping the switch to migrate to the
upgrade. May be worth checking out if they do the same sort of thing.
Thanks,
Brian
On Jul 30, 2018, 1:41 AM -0500, Keith Clarke via use-livecode
And don’t forget about the way mobile can dump everything at any time too. So
you would end up with mobile disk and memory as the cache for the upstream DB
server.
On Jul 31, 2018, 11:23 AM -0500, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
, wrote:
> That's an interesting strategy. I'm gonna mull over this an
In addition to bug fixes, I found this in the release notes for glibc 2.13:
New optimized string functions for x86-64: strnlen (SSE2),
strcasecmp (SSE2, SSSE3, SSE4.2), strncasecmp (SSE2, SSSE3, SSE4.2)
Implemented by Ulrich Drepper.
This is something that is probably beneficial to string fu
Here is one direction...
yamlFileToArray
https://github.com/trevordevore/levure/blob/master/framework/levure.livecodescript
Thanks,
Brian
On Jul 31, 2018, 3:03 PM -0500, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode
, wrote:
> On 31/07/2018 20:03, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote:
> > For all of JSON's JS-
Don’t have time to test right now but something along these lines:
\b[0-9] ?(yr|yo|year)
\b is a word break
? Means 0 or 1 of previous char (space)
| is alternate separator
Thanks,
Brian
On Aug 1, 2018, 11:58 AM -0500, Stephen MacLean via use-livecode
, wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> While no expert on
I have a new iPad and it works for me from the normal App Store. I have the
same model as below and am at 11.4.1.
On Aug 2, 2018, 2:56 PM -0500, Randy Hengst via use-livecode
, wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Well, school districts around the United States are starting to get things
> going for new school
For me I have to include the protocol. So the “http://“ needs to be there to
get any output.
Thanks,
Brian
On Aug 3, 2018, 12:08 PM -0500, Stephen MacLean via use-livecode
, wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I’m experiencing at put URL oddity:
>
> Entering: put URL "https://www.google.com” into the message b
I have not tried this, but have you considered a background group for the
browser widget? You could hide and unhide it possibly?
Thanks,
Brian
On Aug 3, 2018, 8:45 AM -0500, Tom Glod via use-livecode
, wrote:
> Hi folks, I don't know the reasoning behind this, but...
>
> when using the brows
t; > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:49 PM, Stephen MacLean via use-livecode <
> > > > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Brian,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for the reply, but I’m conf
"symmetric difference" will get you the first part (unique keys)
You could shorten the compare loop by using "intersect" (to get common keys)
function getKeys pLeft, pRight
local tIntersect, tResult
intersect pLeft with pRight into tIntersect
repeat for each key tKey in tIntersect
(As Mark said, if the values are different, which value would you want in
the array?)
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runre
out what to name the beast too...
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 6:54 PM, Mark Wieder via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> On 08/03/2018 04:26 PM, Brian Milby via use-livecode wrote:
>
>> "symmetric difference" will get you the first part (unique keys)
/Library is going to have the same permission issue, but
/Users/username/Library... would be fine.
The down side is that the user can accidentally or intentionally mess with
stuff stored there more easily that something built into the app or stored
in the Applications/Program Files directories (al
Yes, specialFolderPath would be good to use. On a desktop, I'm not sure
that I'd want non-user facing data stored in the documents location unless
you configure it to be hidden. Windows and Mac both have "support" folders
defined. "library" would be the place on iOS. Android doesn't have one
th
Other than the fact that coding is fun :)
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 8:15 PM, Mark Wieder via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> On 08/03/2018 05:16 PM, Brian Milby via use-livecode wrote:
>
> Of course, then we have to figure out what to name the beast too...
>
On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> On 2018-08-04 04:00, Brian Milby via use-livecode wrote:
>
>> Other than the fact that coding is fun :)
>>
>
> Yes - but coding in LCS is much more fun, quicke
On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 11:33 AM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> This one's not at all hard to write, just floated the idea to see if
> others saw it suitable to add to the "convenience" functions already in the
> language, such as:
>
>
@Richard,
What was
I guess I'll have to admit I had to do the line-by-line to see it, but once
I did I realized what the problem was. Pointers and reference counting is
one thing that I still really need to think about when looking at lower
level code. That is one thing that really does make LCS nice. LCB too for
On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Mark Wieder via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> On 08/04/2018 09:36 AM, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote:
>
>> On 2018-08-04 18:25, Mark Wieder via use-livecode wrote:
>>
>
> Heh - well your pseudo-code just essentially made my point for
Wow, and Trevor knew right away... pretty impressive!
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livec
Plugins should probably be de-scriptified for distribution for this
reason. A similar argument could be made for some IDE library code too. I
have to wonder if there is any performance impact to the number of stacks
the IDE has to deal with now that so much is scriptified. (The list of
stacks is
My question is why use the button? Loop through the data in the grid and make
the tsnet call manually for each line. If the button is calling a script
outside of the DG, then you can use the same call. Then you don’t have to do
any of those things to figure out the name of the row group.
On Aug
On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 6:14 PM, Mark Wieder via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> On 08/04/2018 11:55 AM, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote:
>
> Remember that this isn't a unique problem to LiveCode - script only stacks
>> (particularly how we've grown to use them) are ak
Here is code that only uses LCS to accomplish the goal (only returning the
keys where they exist in both arrays but the values are different). This
is made to be similar to the way the existing functions work (with the
option to mutate).
command valueDiff @pDestinationA, @pLeftA, pRightA
local
I think Mark's code had a typo (left returned too many keys), but even when
corrected it takes half the time as a pure LCS solution. Here's my
modification:
function bwmValueDiff pLeft, pRight
local tResult
intersect pLeft with pRight into tResult["1"]
repeat for each key tKey in tResult
I have not been able to locate the earlier conversation on pass by
reference vice value. I did a quick test and it took 100,000 loops to be
able to get a difference that was obvious. My test was to construct simple
functions that took 1 to 3 parameters. 3 functions used all pass by value,
3 func
Current
filter [{lines | items | keys | elements} of] filterSource {with | without |
[not] matching} [{wildcard pattern | regex pattern}] filterPattern [into
targetContainer]
Possible Suggestion
filter [{lines | items | keys | elements} of] filterSource {{with | without |
[not] matching} [{wi
Or to include new modifiers:
{keeping | discarding | with | without | [not] matching}
Which if not using the “into” form the first two make the statement much
clearer as to the intent.
Thanks,
Brian
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.run
Probably better:
filter [{lines | items | keys | elements} of] filterSource {keeping |
discarding | with | without | [not] matching} {[{wildcard | regex} pattern]
filterPattern | where filterExpression} [into targetContainer]
So Monte’s example would be:
filter keys of tFoo keeping where tFoo
I like A. Here is my take on the actual dictionary syntax:
filter filterSource by {keeping | discarding} [{lines | items | keys |
elements}] {{with | without | [not] matching} {[{wildcard | regex} pattern]
filterPattern | where filterExpression} [into targetContainer]
Not sure about leaving the
You can get/put data from/into the grid one row at a time without needing to
figure out the group name, so you could have it update in real time in your
external button. You should be able to use the same behavior script (possibly
with a slight modification) everywhere.
I’m not at a computer ri
Intersect is an engine implementation of something that can be done in pure
LCS. I wrote a version of the function you needed that only used LCS without
the engine optimized functions. My function only iterates over an array once
(instead of 3 times) yet takes twice as long. It deletes keys from
So this syntax:
filter filterSource by [keeping | discarding] [[the] {lines | items | keys
| elements}] {matching [wildcard | regex] pattern filterPattern | where
filterExpression} [into targetContainer]
Would allow a shortened version:
filter X by matching pattern "regex" into Z
Which would expan
Earlier in this thread it was mentioned that LCS doing a loop once would
probably outpace the engine looping 2 times + a LCS loop at some point. I
decided to see if I could figure out a point where this might take place.
My test was pretty simple. I set a target number of elements for each
array.
I posted a stack with the valueDiff code tests that I was doing if anyone
is interrested:
https://milby.us/lc/ValueDiff.livecode.zip
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage you
I can speed it up by 10% just be replacing the "add 1 to" with "put true
into". The first if would lose the ">0". A single pass went from 50s to
44s on my iMac.
On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 9:36 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> Mark Waddingham wrote:
>
> >
<
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> I’m fairly sure you could speed it up by continuing to add keys to p and
> returning that instead of building the list R.
>
> > On 6 Aug 2018, at 1:24 pm, Brian Milby via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
&
On my IDE, mainstacks is currently 204. The stacks are stored in a linked list,
so no limit other than memory and performance.
Thanks,
Brian
On Aug 6, 2018, 7:14 AM -0500, Stephen MacLean via use-livecode
, wrote:
>
> > On Aug 6, 2018, at 8:05 AM, Paul Dupuis via use-livecode
> > wrote:
> >
>
Ah, that is what I was missing (numtobyte)... I knew that 4000 seconds
wasn't right :)
I was able to shave a bit more off by only calling numtobyte twice (17s to
12s for single pass):
function get_primes pN
local tMroot, tPrimes, tIsItPrime, tYes, tNo
put numtobyte(66) into tYes
put numto
2 should be included, but the original optimized version skipped it.
Thanks,
Brian
On Aug 6, 2018, 6:25 PM -0500, Niggemann, Bernd via use-livecode
, wrote:
> This also helps a bit. Where is Hermann?
>
> -
> function get_primes pN
> local tMroot, tPrimes, tIsItPrime, tYes, tNo
button "Array (original)"
Found 664579 primes in 51.543966 seconds
button "Array (bwm)"
Found 664579 primes in 49.139622 seconds
button "Array (mark)"
Found 664579 primes in 43.483821 seconds
button "Byte (alex)"
Found 664579 primes in 15.016109 seconds
button "Byte (bwm)"
Found 664579 primes in 11
I have also started with libSodium (because it had a compiled dll I could try)
if you want another example. I have not posted anything yet since it does not
do anything very useful yet (it will initialize and generate a key pair but I
have not done any of the parts to use the keys).
Thanks,
Bri
I don’t think this is an issue exclusive to LC. My main Access DB has code that
will do the same thing. Sometimes things come back fine because it was just
busy (SharePoint issues do cause it to get totally hung sometimes as well
though).
Thanks,
Brian
On Aug 7, 2018, 1:07 PM -0500, Paul Dupuis
This is a continuation of some code introduced in the "valueDiff" thread,
but wanted to take it in a slightly different direction. We had some great
success at getting a process that took over 50 seconds on my machine down
to under 10 seconds. It isn't anything that we would actually use in
produ
Do you have an example of the problem? The PI uses the tree view widget and
should handle arrays. The one possible issue would be if the key had a comma
which could cause issues (don’t think the PI has changed to support that but I
do know an update to the widget is done - pathDelimiter)
Thanks
the date
the time
Thanks,
Brian
On Aug 9, 2018, 8:56 AM -0500, Keith Clarke via use-livecode
, wrote:
> Hi folks,
> Please can anyone share the magic syntax to
>
> put today into tDate
>
> put now into the tTime
>
> I haven’t found a magic keyword to seed the docs or Google.
> Thanks
> Keith
> __
I’ve done a bit of work in the tree widget, so I can take care of submitting a
PR against a bug/enhancement request there.
Thanks,
Brian
On Aug 9, 2018, 9:56 AM -0500, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
, wrote:
> I'm using rc1, and the PI issues persist so far as I can see. As I mentioned,
> the ele
- The PI tabs (Basic, Contents, Custom...) are one thing that is almost
more efficient now than in 6. Good! But still needs improvement. I say
"almost" efficient because the little tab buttons are way too small -
about 11x10 px on my screen. That's takes more effort and concentration
to click, and
I've briefly looked at a few issues and have some comments:
I should be able to put together something on the Custom Properties portion
of the PI. I'm looking at the code and am not sure yet if the change needs
to be in the widget, the PI, or both. I think that the widget should have
a warning
Before going too far, I'd like to get some feedback on the best way to
address one of the issues that Curry brought up.
Currently, when in the Tree View widget (which is used in the Custom
Properties PI), if you click on the "+" icon to add a new array key, the
value in the existing key is lost if
Events are sent when the button is clicked, just need to verify everything. It
may require a different message, but have not gotten that far. Modifying the
widget is easy though.
Thanks,
Brian
On Aug 10, 2018, 10:24 AM -0500, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
, wrote:
> And the + button is actually
Scroll wheel is set to move the whole group, so any individual control is not
touched. It does not move any content itself, just the whole “card”.
Thanks,
Brian
On Aug 10, 2018, 11:32 AM -0500, Mark Wieder via use-livecode
, wrote:
> On 08/09/2018 07:47 PM, Brian Milby via use-livecode wr
I’m biased since I gave a talk, but it was good. We do have 2 more.
Thanks,
Brian
On Aug 10, 2018, 9:59 AM -0500, Tom Glod via use-livecode
, wrote:
> This might sound like a dumb question, but are the livecode global events
> still going on for the remainder of the year? we just had one las
I do it both ways, the problem is that behavior scripts created for
maintaining a stack (version control) are inconvenient in the IDE. I've
thought about suggesting a multiple step scriptify for IDE tools. The
first step would be to create a card to house all behavior buttons. The
first round wo
Aug 4, 2018 at 12:00 PM Brian Milby via use-livecode <
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> > Plugins should probably be de-scriptified for distribution for this
> > reason.
> >
>
> This would be very bad for Navigator. Navigator shows multiple copies of
&g
Very nice. (I did notice that your collapse code still has an apparent
debug msg put with a couple of numbers).
I'll take it for a spin and see if I notice anything (but kind of doubt I
will).
Thanks,
Brian
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 7:56 PM, Geoff Canyon via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runre
I think GitHub could be a great place to store/share stacks. Here is an example
of what is possible:
https://github.com/bwmilby/lc-misc/tree/master/NestedDGBehavior
That is a binary stack but includes a readme.md that links to a screen shot and
all scripts are exported from the stack and are vie
the effective rect
Thanks,
Brian
On Aug 13, 2018, 9:57 PM -0500, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
, wrote:
> My dictionary doesn't work and I don't see what I need in the See Also
> for the online dicts, so maybe someone here remembers:
>
> How do I specify that I want to set the rect of a stack w
Strange... alt key works on my Win10 laptop.
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 9:05 PM, Mark Wieder via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> On 08/14/2018 04:37 PM, Geoff Canyon via use-livecode wrote:
>
>> I've updated to fix several reported issues, and update the Find In
>> Scripts
>>
6.0 according to the dictionary.
Thanks,
Brian
On Aug 14, 2018, 11:08 PM -0500, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
, wrote:
> Thanks. I had thought I'd tried that and it didn't work, but I tried
> again at your prompting and indeed it works well, even as far back as v6.7.
>
> Do you recall when the
Several keys cause the engine to perform work on the data before returning it.
I would compare with pulling data from the raw clipboard to ensure the engine
is not manipulating it first.
Thanks,
Brian
On Aug 15, 2018, 4:25 PM -0500, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
, wrote:
> Tom Glod wrote:
>
>
I don’t think you can count on the shutdown message, so you would export on
each change.
Arrays can use text for the key, so you could make things easier by using loops
and field names.
Thanks,
Brian
On Aug 15, 2018, 4:58 PM -0500, John McKenzie via use-livecode
, wrote:
>
>
> Hello again, eve
The problem with the fullClipboardData and clipboardData is that when you
ask for a text key type that isn't on the system clipboard, then LiveCode
will generate it for you.
So if you ask for styled text, first it will just give you styled text from
the clipboard. If not available, it will try fo
Sneidar via use-livecode
, wrote:
> Oh no kidding! I didn't realize that! I thought the clipboard created ALL the
> key types when it imported, but it makes more sense (more efficient) doing it
> on the fly.
>
> Bob S
>
>
> > On Aug 15, 2018, at 19:44 , Brian Mi
Pattern “*.(jpe?g|png|gif)”
Thanks,
Brian
On Aug 17, 2018, 6:44 AM -0500, Klaus major-k via use-livecode
, wrote:
> Hi friends,
>
> I know how to:
> ...
> filter list_of_files with "*.jpg"
> ...
> But REGEX stuff is way over my head. :-/
>
> Can anyone provide the regex/pattern syntax for filteri
301 - 400 of 907 matches
Mail list logo
