I am not a genius, Mark Waddingham is a genius... I am Brazilian though, and
since all Brazilians are Evil... I can qualify for evil now and try to reach
my genius degree later...
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Bob Sneidar b...@twft.com wrote:
And he has yet to succumb to evil, the way most
hmmm... that is EXACTLY what an Evil Brazilian Genius might say to put us off
his trail...
Bob
On Jul 25, 2011, at 9:57 AM, Andre Garzia wrote:
I am not a genius, Mark Waddingham is a genius... I am Brazilian though, and
since all Brazilians are Evil... I can qualify for evil now and try to
On 7/24/11 1:23 PM, Pete Haworth wrote:
I guess this isn't quite the same thing but why is it that when I create a
field by script, the size of the field is different than when I just drag
one to my stack from the Tools palette. I thought the templates were
supposed to ensure consistency but
Cool, thanks Jacque - I need to look at the references more carefully!
Still think it would be nice if the templates obeyed the preference
settings though, or at least have a preference setting to achieve that.
Pete
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 12:14 PM, J. Landman Gay
Andre-
Monday, July 25, 2011, 12:32:31 PM, you wrote:
just out of curiosity, what does MC IDE do, any clue?
With the MC IDE you draw the object onto the stack rather than
dragging it, rather like the RR tool palette of old, so the default
size doesn't really come into play.
--
-Mark Wieder
Hi Andre,
Am 25.07.2011 um 21:32 schrieb Andre Garzia:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 4:14 PM, J. Landman Gay
jac...@hyperactivesw.comwrote:
On 7/24/11 1:23 PM, Pete Haworth wrote:
I guess this isn't quite the same thing but why is it that when I create a
field by script, the size of the
no predefined sizes, just select a tool and drag/create an object.
Oh I see!!!
Thanks guys!
Best
Klaus
--
Klaus Major
http://www.major-k.de
kl...@major.on-rev.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
One of the things I was working on was a dropField stack, in which you set up
some minimum and maximum sizes, the font and size you want, and then you can
pick a column in an SQL table, and the dropfield stack will drop the field onto
your main stack card, no smaller than x, no larger than y,
On Jul 25, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Andre Garzia wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 4:14 PM, J. Landman Gay
jac...@hyperactivesw.comwrote:
On 7/24/11 1:23 PM, Pete Haworth wrote:
I guess this isn't quite the same thing but why is it that when I create a
field by script, the size of the field is
On Jul 25, 2011, at 3:23 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
One of the things I was working on was a dropField stack, in which you set up
some minimum and maximum sizes, the font and size you want, and then you can
pick a column in an SQL table, and the dropfield stack will drop the field
onto your
Mark Wieder:
Richard Gaskin wrote:
Like my t-shirt sez:
Know the engine.
Trust the engine.
Use the engine.
My engine, right or wrong?
That'll be my new t-shirt if LiveCode goes open source and we can
actually tailor the engine. ;)
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World
LiveCode training
I guess this isn't quite the same thing but why is it that when I create a
field by script, the size of the field is different than when I just drag
one to my stack from the Tools palette. I thought the templates were
supposed to ensure consistency but maybe I'm misunderstanding their purpose
On 7/22/11 10:26 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Jacque-
Friday, July 22, 2011, 7:49:28 PM, you wrote:
On 7/22/11 7:49 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Jacque-
Friday, July 22, 2011, 2:26:00 PM, you wrote:
You can set the destroystack property for newly-created stacks in the
Files and Memory section of
Jacque-
Saturday, July 23, 2011, 11:46:53 AM, you wrote:
On 7/22/11 10:26 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Jacque-
Friday, July 22, 2011, 7:49:28 PM, you wrote:
On 7/22/11 7:49 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Jacque-
Friday, July 22, 2011, 2:26:00 PM, you wrote:
You can set the destroystack property for
Mark Wieder wrote:
You can also set the destroyStack of the templateStack before creating
a script and get the same result. Still, I do wish stack creation
would respect the IDE preferences setting so that we wouldn't end up
with little surprises like this.
If your own scripts contain stacks
Folks,
It is with immense happiness that I announce a new plugin called
AAG|LayerComps. For those that know Adobe Photoshop, this is a recreation of
its Layer Comps palette for LiveCode. It allows you to record the visibility
and rects of controls in a given card and switch between those recorded
Folks,
I've just made a little update to this... v0.4
:-)
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Andre Garzia an...@andregarzia.com wrote:
Folks,
It is with immense happiness that I announce a new plugin called
AAG|LayerComps. For those that know Adobe Photoshop, this is a recreation of
its
On 7/22/11 4:04 PM, Pete Haworth wrote:
That sounds great! If I'm understanding it correctly, it will get round one
of my pet peeves about changing card layouts in the IDE - many of the
changes cannot be undone and even if you close the card and say you don't
want to save, the changes are
Jacque-
Friday, July 22, 2011, 2:26:00 PM, you wrote:
You can set the destroystack property for newly-created stacks in the
Files and Memory section of prefs.
Unless you create stacks by script, in which case the destroyStack
preference is ignored... sad but true...
--
-Mark Wieder
On 7/22/11 7:49 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Jacque-
Friday, July 22, 2011, 2:26:00 PM, you wrote:
You can set the destroystack property for newly-created stacks in the
Files and Memory section of prefs.
Unless you create stacks by script, in which case the destroyStack
preference is ignored...
On 7/22/11 5:45 PM, Pete Haworth wrote:
OK, thanks for that info, that will definitely help. I tend to be wary of
setting anything with destroy in its name to true!
You aren't the only one. It was an unfortunate choice of terminology,
and it's scared most everyone at some point. It should be
Jacque-
Friday, July 22, 2011, 7:49:28 PM, you wrote:
On 7/22/11 7:49 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Jacque-
Friday, July 22, 2011, 2:26:00 PM, you wrote:
You can set the destroystack property for newly-created stacks in the
Files and Memory section of prefs.
Unless you create stacks by script,
Jacque-
Friday, July 22, 2011, 7:51:51 PM, you wrote:
On 7/22/11 5:45 PM, Pete Haworth wrote:
OK, thanks for that info, that will definitely help. I tend to be wary of
setting anything with destroy in its name to true!
You aren't the only one. It was an unfortunate choice of terminology,
I just noticed on Andre's video, it's called something like Purge this
stack in his inspector - maybe that's a 4.6.3 change. I guess Purge is
marginally better than destroy!
Pete
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 7:51 PM, J. Landman Gay jac...@hyperactivesw.comwrote:
On 7/22/11 5:45 PM, Pete Haworth
24 matches
Mail list logo
