Bill wrote:
"For me, it's a pain point because when I try to build a standalone and I don't
have one of the widgets linked, I only get a message saying "module not found"
or something like that. "
I think it is actually worse than that. I'm bleary eyed from pushing so many
builds these past
William Prothero wrote:
>> On Apr 28, 2017, at 8:30 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>>
>> Why is this such an ongoing pain point?
>>
>> How are dependencies handles in other systems?
>
>
> Richard,
> For me, it's a pain point because when I try to build a standalone
> and I don't have one of the
Richard,
For me, it's a pain point because when I try to build a standalone and I don't
have one of the widgets linked, I only get a message saying "module not found"
or something like that. Seems it would be easy to notify the name of the
in-found module.
Best,
Bill
William Prothero
Why is this such an ongoing pain point?
How are dependencies handles in other systems?
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Systems
Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
ambassa...@fourthworld.com
Mike K. wrote:
I thought once you ran it once, when you switch to manual, the
auto-selected ones stay.
hhm… that would be nice… easy to test..
stand by (time passes here)
Nope, no go…
Test one:
1) go to SA settings-> inclusions uncheck widgets headerbar and switch button #
which
I thought once you ran it once, when you switch to manual, the
auto-selected ones stay.
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 12:27 AM, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami via
use-livecode wrote:
> Is there a way to run the "scan for inclusions" required and get a list.
>
> Waiting for
Is there a way to run the "scan for inclusions" required and get a list.
Waiting for the inclusion scan while building a standalone take a lot of time.
Sometimes I would like to check to see that I have set everything the app needs.
it would be helpful to be able to run the "scan for required