That doesn't generalize to more than two levels (without many extra
lines of code) - you essentially have to number or label the repeat
loops, and check in many places whether the 'exitMe" variable has been
set to a higher level or not. And it's pretty fragile if additional
levels of repeat loo
> RICHARDG wrote:
>
> This would allow us to exit a specific loop when loops are nested.
>
> I can't recall the specifics of his proposed syntax, but I remember
> being impressed by how natural it seemed. Maybe it was along the lines of:
>
> repeat with i = 1 to tSomething named "MySomething
On 30/06/2017 17:32, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote:
What WILL save time (and I think it's on the list of future V9 features) is script editor
"clairvoyance" or AutoFill as it's called. Imagine all your text variables
starting with vtx (autofill usually requires a minimum of characters typ
The way it is in Director is nice. These are all valid statements:
put “one two three” into v
put the last char of word 3 of v
— “e”
v = “one two three"
put v.word[3].char[v.word[3].length]
— “e"
put [{a:1,b:2,c:3},{d:4,e:5,f:6}] into alist
put alist[2].d
— 4
put the d of alist[2]
— 4
put item
Lagi Pittas wrote:
> I Can't understand this fixation with how many characters typed.
This is part of a statement: It's
This is part of a statement: not
This is part of a statement: so
This is part of a statement: much
This is part of a statement: about
This is part of a statement: the
This is p
What WILL save time (and I think it's on the list of future V9 features) is
script editor "clairvoyance" or AutoFill as it's called. Imagine all your text
variables starting with vtx (autofill usually requires a minimum of characters
typed) and now you get a list of all your text variables, or a
which is exactly why regular expressions are such a PITA to diagnose.
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 6:05 AM, Lagi Pittas via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> I Can't understand this fixation with how many characters typed.
>
> I now quite like the verbose "dot notation" of Liveco
I Can't understand this fixation with how many characters typed.
I now quite like the verbose "dot notation" of Livecode - it's now second
nature and it's the last thing I would even bother asking to augment with
"real" dot notation.
the put into variable adds very little time to typing and is
s