As always, YMMV.
I created a stack with two fields. Ran this script once:
on mouseUp
repeat with i = 1 to 15
repeat 20
if random(4) 1 then put random(100) - 30 after R
put tab after R
end repeat
put cr into char -1 of R
end repeat
put R into fld
Apparently it was 9 hours with some interruptions. If we're talking basic
functionality -- fly the bird, flap the wings, move the pillars left and
count how many the user has passed, collision detection, start/end games
and high score tracking -- then I'm guessing this wouldn't go much faster
in
I created a test stack. I created six buttons and grouped them. I ran the
following in a seventh button. It never failed.
I'm using 6.5.2. Somewhere along the way the more specific childControlIDs
was added. I didn't know if it is available in 6.1.1 so I didn't use it.
on mouseUp
repeat 1000
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com
wrote:
I'd like to put a stack into a variable, but without reading the stack
file from disk.
Other languages have first class functions, you want first class stacks. ;-)
___
It's hard to say without context, but one way to handle things like this is
to fold it all into a function/handler. Then if you want to exit you can
exit/return.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 8:55 PM, J. Landman Gay jac...@hyperactivesw.com
wrote:
I've needed that too occasionally but I've always
Am I correct that LC's support for playing multiple sounds simultaneously
is limited? For example, if I wanted to make a guitar simulator, allowing
the user to play the strings individually and in chords would be difficult?
Or has that improved?
gc
___
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:25 AM, Scott Rossi sc...@tactilemedia.com wrote:
Mobile is
multi-channel.
Ooh, seems like a winner (I wasn't planning to build for desktop anyway).
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Richmond richmondmathew...@gmail.com
wrote:
on mouseUp
set the moveSpeed to 65000
put item 2 of the loc of me into LCK
move me to ZZZ, LCK
end mouseUp
where 'ZZZ' is the fixed lateral location.
I've set the moveSpeed way up high so the movement is
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Peter Bogdanoff bogdan...@me.com wrote:
How can I drag it by clicking on one side of this group?
local xOff -- the offset for dragging
local dragging -- the flag set for dragging
on mouseDown
put item 1 of the loc of me - item 1 of the mouseLoc into xOff
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Richmond richmondmathew...@gmail.com
wrote:
now img Saturns trots smoothly round my rather jagged, freehand oval,
BUT img Mars jerks and pauses like an alcoholic on a major binge-drink.
Getting back to this original question -- I can't replicate this in 6.5.2
This has several restrictions, but it generates all permutations of 10
items in about 6 seconds on my recent macbook. It uses two functions, one
to generate a permuted list of single digits, and the other to replace in
the actual items to be permuted.
The restrictions are:
1. The general
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Beat Cornaz b.cor...@gmx.net wrote:
I am a bit at a loss, as I would be surprised if my way would be like 25
times faster than the fastest known algorithm. Did I make a mistake in
implementing Dicks code (although
Dick also reports 2 minutes to do the job, as
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 6:21 AM, Beat Cornaz b.cor...@gmx.net wrote:
But I think it quite a pity (to put it mildly) that LC 6.xx is so much
slower thank 5.5.
Could it be the unicode implementation? Agreed, that would be unfortunate.
It would be nice to have a text setting for fields.
This routine will permute to any depth that memory/time allows. It has the
added benefit of using characters starting from any ASCII value you like,
allowing you to work around what you want to eventually permute using the
PLines routine.
It also has the speed benefit you get from using items
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Peter M. Brigham pmb...@gmail.com wrote:
A followup on how to handle duplicate characters in the permuting
algorithm. The following seems to work, not sure how it will scale. tString
can contain any characters -- duplicates, digits, spaces, whatever.
I don't
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Beat Cornaz b.cor...@gmx.net wrote:
So, getting rid of the duplicates inside the script is quite important. I
still don't see yet how I can do that in Geoff's script (I will look into
that again, as soon as I can find a little time). If we can get that to
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Beat Cornaz b.cor...@gmx.net wrote:
Sat, 30 Aug 2014 Geoff wrote :
Used Alex's code to generate a list of the permutations of all the
characters that were duplicates.
Substituted in unique characters for each instance of the duplicates.
Ran my
Gah -- now I'm not convinced that my way will work at all. I'll test and
reply later.
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Geoff Canyon gcan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Beat Cornaz b.cor...@gmx.net wrote:
Sat, 30 Aug 2014 Geoff wrote :
Used Alex's code to generate
I have a set of code that seems to do the trick. It takes as an argument
the number of each element to permute. So for your examples:
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Beat Cornaz b.cor...@gmx.net wrote:
On my computer :
Input : 1112223334568320 mSec
Input : 1233
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Beat Cornaz b.cor...@gmx.net wrote:
This is my fastest script so far :
I think this is faster for many arguments. It might be slower for others. I
removed the dependency on an external routine for removing duplicates. It
also removes duplicates only when
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Alex Tweedly a...@tweedly.net wrote:
I also added method4, which tries to get the best of both worlds. It
restricts the additional memory usage (by building up a second variable,
but removing sections of the input variable at the same time), and also
does
I've experienced something that might be related. For several versions,
culminating in 6.6.x, the activation dialog had multiple invisible
controls, making it very difficult for me to activate LC. I also found that
sometimes whole groups would go invisible in my stacks. I never found a
consistent
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Beat Cornaz b.cor...@gmx.net wrote:
Mon, 1 Sep 2014 19:47:58 -0500
From: Geoff Canyon gcan...@gmail.com
I think this is faster for many arguments. It might be slower for others.
Your right. The only thing with this script is, that it sometimes
generates too
http://chromakode.com/post/notes-on-xkcd-pixels
That's a description of how XKCD's Pixels panel
http://www.xkcd.com/1416/ was developed using HTML 5 in three days. I
wonder how long it would take in LiveCode.
The basic parameters are:
1. Black and white 600x600 image, zoomable.
2. The zoom must
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 3:49 PM, William Prothero proth...@earthednet.org
wrote:
Also, I am assuming that if I delete a group, all of the objects in it are
also deleted.
Another possibility is to simply hide the group. That way creating another
graph will likely be faster -- depending on your
I generally use a utility command, something like:
on forceNControls pID,N
put max(2,N + 1) into M
repeat (the number of controls of pID) - M + 1
delete control M of pID
end repeat
set the vis of control 1 of pID to (N 0)
repeat with i = (the number of controls of pID) to N - 1
I came across http://exercism.io/about
It's an interesting site for developers to improve their skills with simple
problems and organized peer review. One of the simpler challenges is
writing a function to return whether a year is a leap year. I wrote this:
function isLeapYear Y
return Y mod 4
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Klaus major-k kl...@major-k.de wrote:
this compiles and kinda works, but not as exspected :-/
...
sort lines of fld 1 by length(each)
You want:
sort lines of fld 1 numeric by length(each)
Otherwise a line with length 13 will sort before a line with length
This is a fun problem.
My first, nearly brute force solution simply maintained an array with the
keys being the sum of the value lists stored in the array -- so X[5] might
contain 2,3. The only optimization inherent in this is that it doesn't
worry about duplicate sums along the way. So if there
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Dr. Hawkins doch...@gmail.com wrote:
If I'm going to call a routine, say, 100 times in a fraction of a second,
do I really save much by inlining it rather than calling it as a function?
Premature optimization is the root of some evil. If you write clean code,
I took just about the worst case scenario: a single-line function I wrote a
few weeks back:
function isLeapYear Y
return Y is a number and Y mod 4 = 0 and (Y mod 100 0 or Y mod 400 = 0)
end isLeapYear
If any function is going to pay the price for the cost of a function call,
that's it --
Here's a function to count the words disregarding quotes. Note that it's
important to replace quotes with space, because there are three words in
this isthree words
and there are three words in
this isthree words
but you want to count four words, which this will do:
function
When the new language code becomes available I am going to write an extension
just for you, Richard...
gc
On Oct 13, 2014, at 11:03 AM, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com
wrote:
I think most of us (except Geoff Canyon who has a rare mind for this sort of
stuff g) would agree
One caveat: if you are assembling a great deal of text in small chunks, you
should likely do it in a variable and then toss it into the field in one go.
Field updates are slower than many (most?) other things you might be doing, and
one field update with 10,000 lines will be *much* faster than
So far so good with LC -- and the new fonts/design are much better for my
eyes.
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Tiemo Hollmann TB toolb...@kestner.de
wrote:
Hello,
any Yosemite issues found yet or everything smooth?
Tiemo
___
use-livecode
I'm wondering if anyone has benchmarked 7.0 performance? I did two quick
tests and found:
on mouseUp
put the long seconds into T
repeat with i = 1 to 2000
put A aa into X
end repeat
put the long seconds - T
end mouseUp
Took almost 5x as long to run as on 6.7, which I
Depending on the size of your data, something like this could be (much)
faster:
function removeLines lineList,S
put 0 into lineCounter
split lineList with comma as set
repeat for each line L in S
add 1 to lineCounter
if lineList[lineCounter] then next repeat
put L cr
I replied in the other thread as well, but:
function removeLines lineList,S
put 0 into lineCounter
split lineList with comma as set
repeat for each line L in S
add 1 to lineCounter
if lineList[lineCounter] then next repeat
put L cr after R
end repeat
return char
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Bob Sneidar bobsnei...@iotecdigital.com
wrote:
I’m kind of surprised at these suggestions. Why not rather build a memory
variable containing the lines that are not selected, then replace the field
with the variable?
That's what the function I posted does.
I've created similar routines in the past. Are you saying you do or don't
want to allow for arbitrarily-large divisors?
a pseudo-code algo for divisors that LC can handle:
1. remove the decimal points, remembering where they were
2. get the length of the divisor
3. grab that many characters from
M - 3 to M of X) * (char N - M - 3 to N - M of Y) to S
end repeat
put char -4 to -1 of S before R
delete char -4 to -1 of S
end repeat
if S is 0 then put empty into S
return leadChar S R
end bigTimes
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Geoff Canyon gcan...@gmail.com
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Chipp Walters ch...@chipp.com wrote:
I should mention I'm on Mac Yosemite.
Also on Yosemite/6.7. Same here.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Bob Sneidar bobsnei...@iotecdigital.com
wrote:
Let me just say that for some folks who do not have enough time to report
bugs, they certainly have found an abundance of time to post their
frustrations to this list! Just sayin’.
It takes far less time to send
understand the need to not waste limited team resources on
bad bug reports, but if the requirements are causing Jacque to fail to
report a bug, that's a huge issue.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com
wrote:
Geoff Canyon wrote:
It takes far less time to send
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 1:06 PM, J. Landman Gay jac...@hyperactivesw.com
wrote:
On 11/13/2014, 1:50 AM, Geoff Canyon wrote:
if the requirements are causing Jacque to fail to
report a bug, that's a huge issue.
Well, to be fair, it doesn't always prevent me from reporting things. If I
have
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 3:10 PM, J. Landman Gay jac...@hyperactivesw.com
wrote:
I blame myself for the omissions (except when Richard G. forgives me.) :)
Bless me Richard, for I have sinned. It has been two weeks since my last
bug report. Since then I wrote three undocumented functions and one
My PHP is weak, but if the memory access test is a regular array, then
comparing it to a livecode array is somewhat apples and oranges, since LC
is really a hash. But on the other hand, there's no way to do a simple
array in LC, so it's not like you can do better.
For the file access test, your
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Andre Garzia an...@andregarzia.com wrote:
co-routines
mmm, co-routines...
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Peter Haworth p...@lcsql.com wrote:
Every now and again, I wonder why certain properties are not available in
LC. The ones that puzzles me the most are the owning card and owning stack
of an object.
Do you mean some shortcut to get the owning card no matter
How does the color picker look different to you? I'm on Yosemite and it
looks the same as I remember: color picker choices across the top: color
wheel (default), color sliders, etc.; then the color wheel itself below
that; then the saturation slider below that; then the actual color selected
and
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Peter Haworth p...@lcsql.com wrote:
My point was that a lot of people have spent time coming up with various
ways of getting a control's owning card/stack which to my way of thinking
means there should be a built-in way of doing it.
Agreed -- here's hoping
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 4:17 AM, Terence Heaford t.heaf...@btinternet.com
wrote:
There seems to be a bug with childControlNames in LC 7.0.1(RC3) as it all
works correctly in LC 6.7.1(RC3).
I think perhaps your code is taking advantage of a quirk in LC. If you
don't give an object a name, the
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Monte Goulding mo...@sweattechnologies.com
wrote:
On the whole I'm not sure if there's a big advantage to implementing it in
the engine but like I said it's not difficult.
I'm assuming that once we have the new syntax definition capability
something like this
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Terence Heaford t.heaf...@btinternet.com
wrote:
Thanks, this does work but I am confused why childControlNames only
returns POLYGON and not graphic id 1011 as graphic id 1011” is it’s
actual name as I have not renamed it.
No idea. It's not doing that for me.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 1:40 AM, Monte Goulding mo...@sweattechnologies.com
wrote:
I would expect adding a property to all objects to still need do be done
in the engine.
Why? I know we don't have detailed documentation on the syntax morphing
functionality, but why would this be any different
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:01 AM, revolut...@duncansoftware.on-rev.com
revolut...@duncansoftware.on-rev.com wrote:
1994 for Windows 3.1 using ToolBook ... it has wandered through
Authorware, Director, Flash, mTropolis, Oracle Media Objects, et al to
finally and happily arrive at Livecode.
Mac with Yosemite 10,10,1 here. I've only checked in LC 7.0.0.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Terence Heaford t.heaf...@btinternet.com
wrote:
I’m using a Mac with Yosemite 10.10.1
Are you Windows or Linux? That may explain it.
All the best
Terry
On 8 Dec 2014, at 14:46, Geoff Canyon
Dec 2014, at 14:46, Geoff Canyon gcan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Terence Heaford
t.heaf...@btinternet.com
wrote:
Thanks, this does work but I am confused why childControlNames only
returns POLYGON and not graphic id 1011 as graphic id 1011” is it’s
actual name
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Geoff Canyon gcan...@gmail.com wrote:
If the object in question is inside a group, you'd have to recurse your
way out, or you could use:
put word -5 to -1 of the long id of btn 1
or if you prefer:
put word -5 to -1 of the long name of btn 1
patches. I was used to using multiple rows to record and
manage
multiple projects. I realize now that It’s no biggie, and I
overreacted!
I’ll build a better tool for what I need and offer to all to make up
for
petulance.
Roger
On Dec 7, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Geoff Canyon gcan
on a 21,5 inch iMac.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/pkqwsgvu6i5q7tz/ColorPickerYosemite.png?dl=0
greetings,
William
2014-12-08 19:57 GMT+01:00 Geoff Canyon gcan...@gmail.com:
William, I'm with you: no small dot, no resizing -- vertically, at
least
--
I can make the color picker
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Scott Rossi sc...@tactilemedia.com wrote:
Admittedly, the cardOwnerID function could fail if a control was located
within a nested group that was explicitly named “card id” but. . .
Exactly why I did it the way I did. I do like the use of the id in
returning
It's been a long time since I saw anything on the syntax extension
functionality, but my recollection was that it was supposed to be the
all-singing, all-dancing wonder of the universe -- meaning that if I wanted
to use a C-like dot-notation (I don't, usually) that would be easy to
build. And that
Anyone here remember that way back when (maybe OS 7) if you set your Mac's
calendar far in the future, maybe 2020, the crayon picker would change so
the crayons' tips were worn down?
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Richmond richmondmathew...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 10/12/14 15:33, Roger Guay
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com
wrote:
The main goal of OL is two-fold: to provide OS API access, and to allow
custom components (libraries, widgets, etc.) to be integrated as smoothly
in usage as engine-native routines and objects.
I don't
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com
wrote:
If longevity of language features is inversely proportionate to their
value, C must be a total waste of time. :)
Ha -- of course I'm not suggesting that; anyone who wants to take away
repeat for each or URL
Yes: the childControlIDs and childConbtrolNames only go one level down;
anything in a group will not be reported. the controlIDs and controlNames
list everything everywhere. So given this structure:
card id 1002
group id 1007 [1007]
| button Button [1004]
| button Button [1006]
put the
I'm thinking about uploading/retrieving images, and wondering if anyone has
already done it?
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
What requirement am I missing that this isn't sufficient -- and capable of
handling multiple fonts and font sizes throughout the text?
get the formattedrect of line 1 to -1 of fld 1
set the topmargin of fld 1 to (the height of fld 1 - item 4 of it + item
2 of it) div 2
On Fri, Dec 19,
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 2:32 PM, BNig bernd.niggem...@uni-wh.de wrote:
Hi Geoff,
I think I found a solution for variable textHeight and different fonts in a
field.
If the formattedRect breaks on mobile, then that's a bug for the LC team,
but other than that, doesn't my two-line solution
Don't you have to set the lockLoc of the image to true to make the resizing
stick reliably?
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Paul Dupuis p...@researchware.com wrote:
I have a problem with scaling images and printing.
I have the following portion of code where tObj is an image and tPrecent
is
We're wandering a bit here, but I disagree completely, so of course I
should reply ;-)
Some 100 years ago, it was considered necessary to memorize log tables.
That skill is now useless.
I remember (near 50 here as well) learning how to derive a square root.
That skill is also useless.
I agree
It's interesting that you bring up the slaughterhouse analogy -- I've used
it on many occasions to make the opposite point: I know that cows are
butchered to make steaks. I've seen videos of it, in fact. I shouldn't have
to learn how to do it to order at McDonalds.
There's a world of difference
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Richmond richmondmathew...@gmail.comwrote:
Kids should learn how to think, but in the context of the
environment they are/will operate in.
Which may change at any moment; so the more things they are exposed to the
better
chance they have to adapt to
I think I still have a slide rule stashed away somewhere. It was my
step-father's. I once asked (circa 1983) in a chemistry class if slide rules
were allowed in addition to calculators, and everyone's head turned.
Richmond, to your point, check out what MIT is doing with Scratch Jr.:
On Feb 27, 2012, at 2:36 AM, Richmond richmondmathew...@gmail.com wrote:
... it is valuable knowledge insofar as you then are aware that by
eating meat you do it at a price; the suffering of vast numbers of animals,
that can, quite easily be avoided.
Having eaten veggie burgers, we'll have
So from a consistency standpoint, you are certainly correct; putting
something into a negative range should behave the same whether the chunk
involved is characters, items, words, or lines. But I'd still argue that
the use of into instead of before or after demands that the target
resolve to a
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:54 PM, J. Landman Gay
jac...@hyperactivesw.comwrote:
I think it should behave the same way character selections do. A negative
range has been a valid construct since HyperCard and is, actually, the only
way to set the insertion point by script. It's a necessary
I understand that this is what the engine returns when the selection is
empty, and I'm prepared to accept it as a necessary method for the engine
to describe an empty insertion point, but just because the engine reports
char 13 to 12 doesn't mean the engine should accept setting the selection
to
Funny, I went through this just a week ago. I found four reasons to abandon
revCopyFile for a shell command:
1. The sound.
2. It's slow.
3. For large numbers of commands it died on me.
4. It can't change the name of the file as part of the copy process.
I was trying to turn 1,700 files in one
be possible if I used put URL.
Pete
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Geoff Canyon gcan...@gmail.com wrote:
I went straight to the shell command, so I don't know for sure, but this
sounds reasonable. There's also the overhead of spinning up AppleScript
in
the first place. If Apple is doing
I posted it earlier. Here it is again.
*on* shellCopyFile tSource,tTarget -- tSource and tTarget are both full
paths
*get* shell(cp quote tSource quote quote tTarget quote)
*if* it is not empty *then*
*-- handle errors here*
*end* *if*
*end* shellCopyFile
On Thu, Mar
No clue how it would work on Windows. Here it is again:
*on* shellCopyFile tSource,tTarget -- full paths
*get* shell(cp quote tSource quote quote tTarget quote)
*if* it is not empty *then*
*-- handle errors here*
*end* *if*
*end* shellCopyFile
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at
.
That's an inconvenience because it means extra coding, but not a show
stopper.
Thanks,
Pete
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Geoff Canyon gcan...@gmail.com
wrote:
The advantages derive from the fact that LiveCode isn't doing the actual
copying with revCopyFile -- the Finder
This works only if the balls hit head-on. Otherwise you need to do the
trig. As a simple example, say there are two balls headed toward each
other. Each has a radius of 2^.5. Ball A is moving at -2 units per second
on the x axis, i.e. to the left, and its center has a Y coordinate of 2.
Ball B is
You're asking me about something I haven't touched in about ten years. ;-)
I don't think I did anything in particular other than prefix the stack name
with rev so it wouldn't show up in stack lists unless the show rev
stacks item in the preferences was set. Other than that, as Richard said,
it's
I'll throw my 2 cents in here as well -- I've found that it doesn't impact
performance significantly to check ticks() each time through the loop. So
instead of a fixed number of iterations, which can lead to a jumpy progress bar
or excessive updates if what you're doing in the loop varies much,
I have a field object, a button object, and a browser object. If the button
script is this, it works as expected:
*on* touchEnd pId
mobGUIUntouch the long id of me
*put* the uText of *group* URL into tURL
*if* char 1 to 7 of tURL is not http://; *then* *put* http://; beforetURL
I figured it out. I had forgotten to include
global gBrowserA
:-/
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Geoff Canyon gcan...@gmail.com wrote:
*on* touchEnd pId
mobGUIUntouch the long id of me
*put* the uText of *group* URL into tURL
*if* char 1 to 7 of tURL is not http
For most of my apps I build a launcher that then loads the actual working
stack from a remote location. I assume that's impossible due to Apple's
restrictions on loading code remotely. But is it possible to save out a
stack from the app locally, allowing it to be saved periodically and loaded
This would be the best job ever.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Colin Holgate co...@verizon.net wrote:
As an aside to your aside… the husband of a ex-colleague of mine was the
person the studio turned to when figuring out the things MacGyver could do.
They would call him up and say
Can you share this 200-line handler?
Sent from my iPad
On Jul 12, 2013, at 3:31 PM, J. Landman Gay jac...@hyperactivesw.com wrote:
One of the mouseUp behaviors is 200 lines long.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please
Arrays are your friend here. If that's too much trouble, you could switch to
numtochar(N) with N 9, or simply escape the commas on the way in and out, but
still: arrays.
Sent from my iPad
On Jul 15, 2013, at 6:30 PM, Scott Rossi sc...@tactilemedia.com wrote:
For example, a line contains an
Does anyone have code to share that allows discontiguous selection and drag
and drop within a list field? i.e. if I have a list field with:
1
2
3
4
5
I can click 3 to select it, shift-click 5 to select 3 to 5, command-click 4
so that 3 and 5 are selected, and then click and drag 3 (with 5 along
, Jul 17, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Geoff Canyon gcan...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone have code to share that allows discontiguous selection and
drag and drop within a list field? i.e. if I have a list field with:
1
2
3
4
5
I can click 3 to select it, shift-click 5 to select 3 to 5, command-click
4
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Peter Haworth p...@lcsql.com wrote:
Resending because the original got caught in the dreaded message is too
long vortex.
This is very useful, thanks Geoff.
I can't quite figure out what's going on with the format statement that's
part of the send of
that message with dragLines = 12,18 and dropLines = 1,2
gc
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Geoff Canyon gcan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Peter Haworth p...@lcsql.com wrote:
Resending because the original got caught in the dreaded message is too
long vortex
/13 9:39 AM, Klaus major-k kl...@major-k.de wrote:
Hi Geoff,
Am 18.07.2013 um 18:23 schrieb Geoff Canyon gcan...@gmail.com:
I did some quick research, and this looks to be as much of a pain as I
remember -- or am I missing something? All I want is to place a
scrolling
list field
, UX/UI Design
On 7/21/13 11:45 AM, Geoff Canyon gcan...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Kaus for pointing it out, and particularly Scott who wrote the
thing
in the first place. When I think back on all I went through with Navigator
trying to make the built-in drag-drop messages work (badly) it's
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Peter Haworth p...@lcsql.com wrote:
It looks like this is probably not going to work as a behavior for me since
the field I'm using it on includes mouseUp/Down handlers to handle
situations other than drag/drop, but other than that, this is great, thanks
1 - 100 of 961 matches
Mail list logo
