That's great news. Thank you !
Even if it can't be installed on a shared server, it should still be
usable from a private one - and therefore usable for many people. Most
importantly, if it can be installed on a local server for development
testing then that would be the way to go. The old
Hi I would be happy to help advance the tools we have to share plugins etc...
I've never co-worker in an open source thingy, so I would not be an
initiator but a follower.
How does such a group get constituted?
Could something like *LOOMIO* provide a first group backbone?
(/collaborative decision
Hi Richard,
Could you ask RunRev to consider using an open source
web-based translation platform to translated LiveCode
dictionary, docs, guides and tutorials?
1) https://www.transifex.com
2) https://launchpad.net
3) http://pootle.translatehouse.org/index.html
4) http://weblate.org
5)
On 11/05/14 22:18, Alejandro Tejada wrote:
Hi Richard,
Could you ask RunRev to consider using an open source
web-based translation platform to translated LiveCode
dictionary, docs, guides and tutorials?
1) https://www.transifex.com
2) https://launchpad.net
3)
Hi Richmond,
Richmond Mathewson-2 wrote
Having experimented quite a bit with web-based machine translation
I think that is most unwise.
However; it might not be a bad idea to use a machine-based translation
first, and then follow it up by proper checking / style-editing / remedial
As a newcomer here, just tried it for the very first time, it crashed and
locked up LIveCode.
Not a good advert.
All the best
Terry
On 10 May 2014, at 04:15, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com wrote:
There have been some bug fixes, but the longer-term plans are queued for
after
I'd be up for contributing.
Regards,
Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, UX Design
On May 9, 2014, at 8:15 PM, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com wrote:
There have been some bug fixes, but the longer-term plans are queued for
after some of the other things get done first
RevOnline/ User Samples does work very well for me in 6.6.2 RC3. It is
working in 6.7 DP3,
not working in 6.6.1 and 7.0 DP3
The problem seems to be that hanging/not working is different for different
users and the bug(s) are difficult to reproduce. But I hope it is getting
there.
On 10 May 2014, at 05:40, Mark Wieder mwie...@ahsoftware.net wrote:
Friday, May 9, 2014, 8:15:13 PM, you wrote:
If we could work out a way to share the work on this with RunRev, anyone
here interested in rolling up their sleeves to help?
You mean trying to work with a rev team that spent six
On 10/05/14 06:15, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Mark Wieder wrote:
Richmond-
Friday, May 9, 2014, 12:38:36 PM, you wrote:
But RevOnline is rather erratic . . .
You're being too kind. At one point Heather assured me that revOnline
was about to be replaced with something better, or at least
On 10/05/14 06:40, Mark Wieder wrote:
Richard-
Friday, May 9, 2014, 8:15:13 PM, you wrote:
If we could work out a way to share the work on this with RunRev, anyone
here interested in rolling up their sleeves to help?
You mean trying to work with a rev team that spent six months ignoring
the
Alright here's a first version of a category management stack, including some
'dummy' example stack interface elements, to show off how it works. It's mostly
a way to avoid category clutter right now.
http://bjoernke.com/temp/Category_test.rev
On 10 May 2014, at 10:07, Björnke von Gierke
TL/DR version: there are challenges, but improving the state of stack
file sharing is doable, esp. with community participation.
Longer version for folks with too much time on their hands:
Björnke von Gierke wrote:
Yes, and every time the community starts to talk business about this,
BNig wrote:
RevOnline/ User Samples does work very well for me in 6.6.2 RC3. It is
working in 6.7 DP3,
not working in 6.6.1 and 7.0 DP3
The problem seems to be that hanging/not working is different for different
users and the bug(s) are difficult to reproduce. But I hope it is getting
there.
Hi Richard
I see your request for assistance as needed and I would like to help, but
based on my limited LC experience I would hinder the progress. I am
responding just to say we hear your request, and want to help. I do have an
ongoing need to see a better documentation system for users (new
I'd say you are in an ideal position to be the eyes of the volunteer team. The
documentation is far too extensive to find problems easily. A person who can
report the entries that are confusing or outdated would be of tremendous help.
You wouldn't have to fix them, just tell folks where to
Vaughn Clement wrote:
I see your request for assistance as needed and I would like to help, but
based on my limited LC experience I would hinder the progress. I am
responding just to say we hear your request, and want to help. I do have an
ongoing need to see a better documentation system for
I completely agree. Naive or new users can provide invaluable input to
documentation authors.
Bill
William Prothero
http://es.earthednet.org
Being here asking questions is a valuable contribution in itself. For every
question posted here there are many subscribers who had the same
Hi,
I would like to broaden the discussion to all livecode knowledge being easily
available.
There are stack being scattered over tons of different sites.
Articles like the one 'Extending the Livecode Message Path’ I only found after
spending months with Livecode.
A good search engine that
On 10/05/14 21:24, Marc Van Cauwenberghe wrote:
Hi,
I would like to broaden the discussion to all livecode knowledge being easily
available.
There are stack being scattered over tons of different sites.
Somebody (who ?) has to assemble a master page (preferably hosted on
RunRev's site)
Hi
I was talking to a senior developer today in the UK, and it is clear that
this email How To is good, but it would be much better if it was a
subject based forum that can be searched for answers. I know that RunRev
has a forum for this purpose and it could serve this purpose. The question
is it
On 10/05/14 21:41, Vaughn Clement wrote:
Hi
I was talking to a senior developer today in the UK, and it is clear that
this email How To is good, but it would be much better if it was a
subject based forum that can be searched for answers. I know that RunRev
has a forum for this purpose and it
Mike Kerner wrote:
...For instance, community contributions to the
documentation is supposed to be included, but it
does not seem to happen.
Ostensibly there's a process for this, with style guidance as well:
http://livecode.com/community/contribute-to-livecode/#%20Writing%20Documentation
If
On 10/05/2014 16:07, Richard Gaskin wrote:
How this applies to what we currently call RevOnline is something
we'll have to figure out, but I think it's very encouraging that just
is in this one thread we have several people willing to help.
...
I'll make that the focus of my next meeting
Alex Tweedly wrote:
The other area I'm even more interested in is RunRev's other major
orphan - the on-rev client, and LCServer live debugger. That was a
great idea - and the debugger still has the potential to be a unique
advantage for LC server; unfortunately, the original on-rev client
I can't even remember them because once it was obvious that nobody was
looking at them, I stopped working on them, so it's been more than a year,
I would bet.
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Richard Gaskin
ambassa...@fourthworld.comwrote:
Mike Kerner wrote:
...For instance, community
Sounds like a wiki - even though, IMHO, wikis suck.
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Richmond richmondmathew...@gmail.comwrote:
On 10/05/14 21:24, Marc Van Cauwenberghe wrote:
Hi,
I would like to broaden the discussion to all livecode knowledge being
easily available.
There are stack
I've made a lot of those single purpose tools. Many of them were part of my
learning about LiveCode.
But I've realized how easy it is to make my own plugins, and to share them.
I've put a few on my website. I have a few more on the way.
I'd like to see more of us publishing small, single purpose
Charles E Buchwald wrote
I've made a lot of those single purpose tools. Many of them were part of
my learning about LiveCode.
But I've realized how easy it is to make my own plugins, and to share
them. I've put a few on my website. I have a few more on the way.
I'd like to see more of us
Alejandro Tejada wrote:
Does exists a visual directory of all stacks published
in all these mail lists and forums?
Ostensibly that's what RevOnline is for. so everyone can have access to
all shared resources right in the IDE.
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World
LiveCode training and
On 09/05/14 22:33, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Alejandro Tejada wrote:
Does exists a visual directory of all stacks published
in all these mail lists and forums?
Ostensibly that's what RevOnline is for. so everyone can have access
to all shared resources right in the IDE.
But RevOnline is
That was sort of why I made the first post, because I stumbled on those two
and said Are you kidding me? Why haven't I seen anything about these?
I'd like to see the tools/add-ons/etc. not just be in a jumbled-up mess of
a list, but have more of an app store type of setup with reviews,
I agree with you there, Mike. I like the _idea_ of RevOnline, but I wish it was
better curated. Not to censor anything, just to be better organized. The
categories are a mess.
Note that there are reviews and ratings already.
The WordPress plugin directory is a good example of system that
Richmond-
Friday, May 9, 2014, 12:38:36 PM, you wrote:
But RevOnline is rather erratic . . .
You're being too kind. At one point Heather assured me that revOnline
was about to be replaced with something better, or at least different.
If that happened in the last couple of years I missed the
Mark Wieder wrote:
Richmond-
Friday, May 9, 2014, 12:38:36 PM, you wrote:
But RevOnline is rather erratic . . .
You're being too kind. At one point Heather assured me that revOnline
was about to be replaced with something better, or at least different.
If that happened in the last couple
Richard-
Friday, May 9, 2014, 8:15:13 PM, you wrote:
If we could work out a way to share the work on this with RunRev, anyone
here interested in rolling up their sleeves to help?
You mean trying to work with a rev team that spent six months ignoring
the fact that nobody could log into
Richard,
Let's start a group to discuss, and it should be more community than core
team. The core team is a little lax on a variety of things, probably
because responsibilities are not clear and expectations are not followed-up
on. For instance, community contributions to the documentation is
Count me in. Sounds like a way that I could contribute to the community and
learn so interesting things about tools and plugins at the same time...
On 09 May 2014, at 10:15 PM, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com wrote:
If we could work out a way to share the work on this with RunRev,
Hey Mike... I'm not sure I've seen those plugins before. I googled them but
couldn't find a link. Do you have a link to either one?
- Charles
On 08 May 2014, at 3:30 PM, Mike Kerner mikeker...@roadrunner.com wrote:
It is often harder than it should be to find things that make development
life
Mike is quite kind.
I need to update a number of these tool things, and will make a public
announcement when they're available.
Best Regards,
Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, UX/UI Design
On 5/8/14 2:30 PM, Charles E Buchwald char...@buchwald.ca wrote:
Hey Mike... I'm not sure
Thanks for this, Scott! I'll look forward to them...
On 08 May 2014, at 5:06 PM, Scott Rossi sc...@tactilemedia.com wrote:
Mike is quite kind.
I need to update a number of these tool things, and will make a public
announcement when they're available.
Best Regards,
Scott Rossi
Mike Kerner wrote
It is often harder than it should be to find things that make development
life better in LC. I found two over the weekend at Scott Rossi's site,
tmAlign and tmEffects, and it made me a little mad that I didn't find
them before now.
[snip]
I have the sensation that LiveCode
42 matches
Mail list logo
