Re: the defaultStack changes on resume

2017-08-10 Thread Mark Waddingham via use-livecode
I'm pretty sure the mouseStack works even if the app is in the background - I 
could be wrong though...

Warmest Regards,

Mark.

Sent from my iPhone

> On 10 Aug 2017, at 19:11, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode 
>  wrote:
> 
> Well now wait just a doggone minute. What if I popup a button but the 
> frontmost application is NOT LC, like when I drag drop onto an object I call 
> a landing pad and popup a button to select what kind of data it is? This is 
> Mac OS X. If LC isn't frontmost, how would that affect the mouseStack? 
> 
> Bob S
> 
> 
>> On Aug 10, 2017, at 10:32 , Mark Waddingham via use-livecode 
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> The reason you get that error is because at present the popup button command 
>> requires there to be a mouseStack. So if you cmd-tab away from the app 
>> whilst your mouse is over some stack, and cmd-tab back in - it will work; if 
>> you do not have your mouse over any stack, and do the same you will get the 
>> error.
> 
> 
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: the defaultStack changes on resume

2017-08-10 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
Well now wait just a doggone minute. What if I popup a button but the frontmost 
application is NOT LC, like when I drag drop onto an object I call a landing 
pad and popup a button to select what kind of data it is? This is Mac OS X. If 
LC isn't frontmost, how would that affect the mouseStack? 

Bob S


> On Aug 10, 2017, at 10:32 , Mark Waddingham via use-livecode 
>  wrote:
> 
> The reason you get that error is because at present the popup button command 
> requires there to be a mouseStack. So if you cmd-tab away from the app whilst 
> your mouse is over some stack, and cmd-tab back in - it will work; if you do 
> not have your mouse over any stack, and do the same you will get the error.


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: the defaultStack changes on resume

2017-08-10 Thread Mark Waddingham via use-livecode

On 2017-08-09 20:48, Trevor DeVore via use-livecode wrote:

I think this bug report has a recipe for the issue you are seeing:

http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=18030

This has been around for a long time. I don’t know of a workaround 
other

than fully qualifying all object references.


Unfortunately that is a separate issue.

The reason you get that error is because at present the popup button 
command requires there to be a mouseStack. So if you cmd-tab away from 
the app whilst your mouse is over some stack, and cmd-tab back in - it 
will work; if you do not have your mouse over any stack, and do the same 
you will get the error.


In fact, you get the same error if you press the shortcut combination 
without the mouse over a stack.


I guess the 'popup' command was always intended to be run in response to 
a mouse-click - both the ExecPopup function and the 'openmenu()' 
function in MCButton have a guard against doing anything if the 
mouseStack is empty.


The requirement for a mouseStack seems to be somewhat deeply tied into 
the menu code so this could be a little tricky to untangle. (It 
certainly seems to be part of the mouse tracking behavior menus need on 
Windows and Linux).


So a simple explanation, but not a clear or easy solution.

Warmest Regards,

Mark.

--
Mark Waddingham ~ m...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
LiveCode: Everyone can create apps

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Re: the defaultStack changes on resume

2017-08-09 Thread Trevor DeVore via use-livecode
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Paul Dupuis via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

> Has any one run into the following situation in LiveCode standalones?
>
> In a multiple window application, the user has either a standard window
> or a modal dialog open (the topWindow which is also the defaultStack).
> They navigate to a 3rd party application and by some means back to the
> LC standalone and click a control in the topWindow (again either a
> standard window or dialog) and that window is NO LONGER the defaultStack
> so an execution error occurs on the first control referenced that is not
> fully qualified.
>
> Obviously, I can fix this by fully qualifying all my object references
> (i.e. instead of using fld "x", using fld "X" of stack "Y") but I am
> curious is anyone else has seen anything like this?
>

I think this bug report has a recipe for the issue you are seeing:

http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=18030

This has been around for a long time. I don’t know of a workaround other
than fully qualifying all object references.

-- 
Trevor DeVore
ScreenSteps
www.screensteps.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Re: the defaultStack changes on resume

2017-08-09 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
When I suspend a stack is save the current focused object and the current 
selection. Then on resume stack I restore it. That seems to work really well 
for me. The topStack should still be the topStack no matter what. Not sure why 
you need to reference the defaultStack. 

Bob S


> On Aug 9, 2017, at 09:08 , Paul Dupuis via use-livecode 
>  wrote:
> 
> Has any one run into the following situation in LiveCode standalones?
> 
> In a multiple window application, the user has either a standard window
> or a modal dialog open (the topWindow which is also the defaultStack).
> They navigate to a 3rd party application and by some means back to the
> LC standalone and click a control in the topWindow (again either a
> standard window or dialog) and that window is NO LONGER the defaultStack
> so an execution error occurs on the first control referenced that is not
> fully qualified.
> 
> Obviously, I can fix this by fully qualifying all my object references
> (i.e. instead of using fld "x", using fld "X" of stack "Y") but I am
> curious is anyone else has seen anything like this?
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: the defaultStack changes on resume

2017-08-09 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
Yes I have had situations where what the built in functions were returning were 
not expected, and it screwed somethign up, which is why I do not rely on them. 
It seems a bit ambiguous to me that "this stack" might return different things 
depending on where the handler resides. By moving a script from a stack handler 
to a front or backscript, this can cause problems. 

Therefore I never use those built in calls, having a drop dead accurate way to 
get what I want anyway. 

Bob S


> On Aug 9, 2017, at 09:53 , Paul Dupuis via use-livecode 
>  wrote:
> 
> I have handlers like these also. I have multiple work-arounds. You can
> use suspend and resume to preserve the defaultStack and restore it. Lots
> of way to work-around. I am curious if others have seen this and whether
> anyone ever found a reproducible recipe.
> 
> So you have seen this behavior? In what versions of LC? Did you ever
> find a consistent recipe to reproduce it?


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: the defaultStack changes on resume

2017-08-09 Thread Paul Dupuis via use-livecode
I have handlers like these also. I have multiple work-arounds. You can
use suspend and resume to preserve the defaultStack and restore it. Lots
of way to work-around. I am curious if others have seen this and whether
anyone ever found a reproducible recipe.

So you have seen this behavior? In what versions of LC? Did you ever
find a consistent recipe to reproduce it?


On 8/9/2017 12:41 PM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote:
> BTW I worked around this by using my getParentStack() function. Here it is:
>
> function getParentCard pObjectID
>put offset("card id", pObjectID) into tStartChar
>put char tStartChar to -1 of pObjectID into tCardID
>return tCardID
> end getParentCard
>
> function getParentStack pObjectID
> put wordOffset("stack", pObjectID) into tFirstWord
> put word tFirstWord to tFirstWord +1 of pObjectID into tParentStack
> return tParentStack
> end getParentStack
>
> NOTE: I only use single word stack names. This function will have to be 
> reworked to account for multi-word stack names. Honestly though, if people 
> would follow basic conventions about naming things, everything gets much 
> simpler. 
>
> Bob S
>
>
>
>> On Aug 9, 2017, at 09:08 , Paul Dupuis via use-livecode 
>>  wrote:
>>
>> Has any one run into the following situation in LiveCode standalones?
>>
>> In a multiple window application, the user has either a standard window
>> or a modal dialog open (the topWindow which is also the defaultStack).
>> They navigate to a 3rd party application and by some means back to the
>> LC standalone and click a control in the topWindow (again either a
>> standard window or dialog) and that window is NO LONGER the defaultStack
>> so an execution error occurs on the first control referenced that is not
>> fully qualified.
>>
>> Obviously, I can fix this by fully qualifying all my object references
>> (i.e. instead of using fld "x", using fld "X" of stack "Y") but I am
>> curious is anyone else has seen anything like this?
>
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: the defaultStack changes on resume

2017-08-09 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
Here is an updated version that should work with any stack name:

function getParentStack pObjectID
put offset("stack ", pObjectID) into tStartChar
put char tStartChar to -1 of pObjectID into tParentStack -- the long name 
of the parent stack
return tParentStack
end getParentStack

Bob S


> On Aug 9, 2017, at 09:41 , Bob Sneidar via use-livecode 
>  wrote:
> 
> BTW I worked around this by using my getParentStack() function. Here it is:
> 
> function getParentCard pObjectID
>   put offset("card id", pObjectID) into tStartChar
>   put char tStartChar to -1 of pObjectID into tCardID
>   return tCardID
> end getParentCard
> 
> function getParentStack pObjectID
>put wordOffset("stack", pObjectID) into tFirstWord
>put word tFirstWord to tFirstWord +1 of pObjectID into tParentStack
>return tParentStack
> end getParentStack
> 
> NOTE: I only use single word stack names. This function will have to be 
> reworked to account for multi-word stack names. Honestly though, if people 
> would follow basic conventions about naming things, everything gets much 
> simpler. 
> 
> Bob S
> 
> 
> 
>> On Aug 9, 2017, at 09:08 , Paul Dupuis via use-livecode 
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> Has any one run into the following situation in LiveCode standalones?
>> 
>> In a multiple window application, the user has either a standard window
>> or a modal dialog open (the topWindow which is also the defaultStack).
>> They navigate to a 3rd party application and by some means back to the
>> LC standalone and click a control in the topWindow (again either a
>> standard window or dialog) and that window is NO LONGER the defaultStack
>> so an execution error occurs on the first control referenced that is not
>> fully qualified.
>> 
>> Obviously, I can fix this by fully qualifying all my object references
>> (i.e. instead of using fld "x", using fld "X" of stack "Y") but I am
>> curious is anyone else has seen anything like this?
> 
> 
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: the defaultStack changes on resume

2017-08-09 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
BTW I worked around this by using my getParentStack() function. Here it is:

function getParentCard pObjectID
   put offset("card id", pObjectID) into tStartChar
   put char tStartChar to -1 of pObjectID into tCardID
   return tCardID
end getParentCard

function getParentStack pObjectID
put wordOffset("stack", pObjectID) into tFirstWord
put word tFirstWord to tFirstWord +1 of pObjectID into tParentStack
return tParentStack
end getParentStack

NOTE: I only use single word stack names. This function will have to be 
reworked to account for multi-word stack names. Honestly though, if people 
would follow basic conventions about naming things, everything gets much 
simpler. 

Bob S



> On Aug 9, 2017, at 09:08 , Paul Dupuis via use-livecode 
>  wrote:
> 
> Has any one run into the following situation in LiveCode standalones?
> 
> In a multiple window application, the user has either a standard window
> or a modal dialog open (the topWindow which is also the defaultStack).
> They navigate to a 3rd party application and by some means back to the
> LC standalone and click a control in the topWindow (again either a
> standard window or dialog) and that window is NO LONGER the defaultStack
> so an execution error occurs on the first control referenced that is not
> fully qualified.
> 
> Obviously, I can fix this by fully qualifying all my object references
> (i.e. instead of using fld "x", using fld "X" of stack "Y") but I am
> curious is anyone else has seen anything like this?


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


the defaultStack changes on resume

2017-08-09 Thread Paul Dupuis via use-livecode
Has any one run into the following situation in LiveCode standalones?

In a multiple window application, the user has either a standard window
or a modal dialog open (the topWindow which is also the defaultStack).
They navigate to a 3rd party application and by some means back to the
LC standalone and click a control in the topWindow (again either a
standard window or dialog) and that window is NO LONGER the defaultStack
so an execution error occurs on the first control referenced that is not
fully qualified.

Obviously, I can fix this by fully qualifying all my object references
(i.e. instead of using fld "x", using fld "X" of stack "Y") but I am
curious is anyone else has seen anything like this?



___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode