Message: 18
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 21:53:01 -0700
From: Mark Wieder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: use-revolution Digest, Vol 21, Issue 133
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Jim-
Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 5:57:53 PM, you wrote:
JH> It should be red b
Message: 8
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 21:41:08 -0500
From: "J. Landman Gay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ANN Daily Crytoquote--my misspelling
To: How to use Revolution
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
On 6/22/05 8:39 PM, Jim Hurley wrote:
John,
Of course you realize that if the = assignment operator was allowed
in Transcript "put" would all but disappear from scripts. Who wants
to type putinto vs =. Put would go the way of button vs btn. I find
myself reversing my opinion on this one. "=" would make a nice
shorthand no
On 23 Jun 2005, at 09:43, Martin Baxter wrote:
Marielle Lange wrote:
Let's not start some arguing. Simple question: how many of you
swear at your
computer. What platform are you using? If you happen to use different
platforms, how often do you swear when using each one of them
Right, few
on Wed, 22 Jun 2005
Richard Gaskin wrote:
> With only 27 keywords in the language, the learning
> requirement for implementing those sorts of
> algorithms in C is arguably much lower, and
> there are infinitely more resources available to get
> one started with C than with CompileItSpeak.
For
Hi Marielle,
I am curious... So I had a look ;-)
In fact, if you strip repeated words in your list, it is 5065 words
long.
Le 23 juin 05 à 12:08, Marielle Lange a écrit :
If you use the url below, you will directly get to see the list of
words which
have a frequency of 10 or more.
http:/
>OTH, allowing ``a=4'' as a shorthand for ``put 4 into a'' harms
it.
Hi John,
I do often write myVar = x. But I like the fact that there is a different logic
for properties and variables.
set the width to 100
put 100 into myVar
You would loose this with the x = 4 syntax.
Marielle
_
>> My dictionary of 61,000 words comes in at 592 K--similar
>> to yours in size. The problem is that it includes a lot of words I've
>> never heard of. For example the dictionary begins with the following:
>
>> aardvark, aardwolf, aba, abaca, abacist, aback, abacus, abaft, abalone,
>> abamp, abampe
Hi Claudi,
You are on the right track... but you need to tune your regular expressions a
bit.
Problem 1: $ means end of the line (not end of the chunk)
Problem 2: \" works with perl and unixy languages. I found it not to work with
revolution. I usually use ""
(replace each _\"_ with _" & quote &
Marielle Lange wrote:
Let's not start some arguing. Simple question: how many of you swear at your
computer. What platform are you using? If you happen to use different
platforms, how often do you swear when using each one of them
Right, few things are more boring than platform wars. I can hon
101 - 110 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
