Hi all,
I wan't to know how I can integrate an another software in Revolution ?
I need that because I have got the main software which call a sub
software, this sub software
play a video. And I want to show this video in the main software. So I
want to know how I can
integrate an another
Hi Mark and Rob
Thank you both for your advice. While my preference is a one record
per card setup I have actually been attempting to implement this using
custom properties and will now continue along these lines.
The problem being coded for (School Rolls essentially) is currently
solved using
Hi Girard,
Is the application you want to integrate with Revolution
scriptable? Are you using Mac, Linux or Windows? WHy can't you play
the movie in Revolution itself?
You might simply launch the movie file. Check the launch command in
de docs.
Best,
Mark
--
Economy-x-Talk
Girard,
If you could be more clear in what you want it would help others help
you. :-)
What type of movie is it? What type of software is the 'other' software?
You may try the Play command:
Plays a movie or sound.
play [filePath | type] [looping] [at point] [options xOptions]
play [stop |
Tom:
PS: I love the J. Donne quote in your signature.
Thanks. Here's the entire poem for all Donne lovers:
The Triple Foole
by John Donne
I am two fooles, I know,
For loving, and for saying so
In whining Poetry;
But wheres that wiseman, that
I have a program that I wrote in visual basic excel for Macintosh a while
ago and I'd like to hire someone to help me re-write it as a RunRev program
using a SQLite database and a spreadsheet like frontend created in RunRev.
Is anyone interested?
Bill
I'm interested in this too...
Sorry I won't be there...
I hope someone videos this session for all those who can't come!
Sivakatirswami
On May 18, 2006, at 10:02 AM, Chipp Walters wrote:
Hi Todd,
I use MagicCarpet to manage all my MainStacks and SubStacks (I call
plugins). I know you
Hi Folks,
I am using a script code that is built in runtime and executed with a
do call. The code calls a send function. I know you can use send
with parameters like:
send myAdd 2, 2 to stack someStack
this works. but sending an array like
send myAdd pArrayA to stack someStack
causes
I am using a script code that is built in runtime and executed with a
do call. The code calls a send function. I know you can use send
with parameters like:
send myAdd 2, 2 to stack someStack
this works. but sending an array like
send myAdd pArrayA to stack someStack
causes the myAdd handler
On May 21, 2006, at 2:42 PM, Andre Garzia wrote:
I am using a script code that is built in runtime and executed with
a do call. The code calls a send function. I know you can use
send with parameters like:
send myAdd 2, 2 to stack someStack
this works. but sending an array like
send
On May 21, 2006, at 3:01 PM, Sarah Reichelt wrote:
I always use something like:
send myAdd pArrayA to stack someStack
so that the variable is evaluated before the send.
Hi, Sarah!
I'll pick on two aspects of that.
First of all, I haven't been convinced that there are any merits to
On May 21, 2006, at 3:17 PM, Dar Scott wrote:
If you have control of the stack, you can change it to take a
flattened stack.
Or better, pass the parameter through a global.
Dar
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Dar,
Thanks for pointing the bug number. I wish I could vote more than 5
votes on a given bug!!!
As a scheme programmer, sometimes, I wan my lists back...
PS: I might not have control of the stack I need to call, think I'll
use customProps to carry the array key/value pairs.
Cheers
Hi Andre,
There are two ways that I use regularly to solve this. You could
combine the parameter and split it in the function that is called.
You could also use the @ operator.
Best,
Mark
--
Economy-x-Talk
Consultancy and Software Engineering
http://economy-x-talk.com
On Sat, 20 May 2006 21:45:24 -0500 Ken Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Re: opening email app in Windows
On 5/20/06 1:02 AM, Peter Brigham [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
All I want is
to be able to activate the email app's frontmost window (which will
be the mostly-completed message).
Another way to pass the array is to
combine pArray using cr and comma --your choice of delim's
--now this variable is just a list
-- with the keys as the first item in each line
send myAdd pArrayA to stack someStack
then
on myAdd pArrayA
split pArray using cr and comma
-- now you
Dar-
Saturday, May 20, 2006, 4:18:10 PM, you wrote:
What would you recommend as the new behavior for Revolution trunc()?
Actually, I'm quite happy with what I posted as new behavior. I never
use trunc() by itself anymore, always tacking an empty string onto the
end. This gives the desired
Richard-
Saturday, May 20, 2006, 1:54:40 PM, you wrote:
This sounds very much like an issue we batted around here last year with
trunc that turned out to be a feature of the processor
Indeed. See my answer to Dar. Although it's not a feature of the
processor so much as of the way standard
On May 21, 2006, at 5:48 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Tacking an
empty string before truncating always gives the correct answer.
There are values for numberFormat that will break that. So, perhaps a
value for numberFormat will need to be specified if that is the new
trunc().
I had one time
On 5/21/06 5:34 PM, Peter Brigham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow, this taps into stuff I know nothing about. Is there an easy way
to find out the window title or ID of the frontmost window for the
email app?
Not without a DLL, I'm afraid.
I'm getting the sense I'd best leave well enough
On 5/22/06, Dar Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 21, 2006, at 3:01 PM, Sarah Reichelt wrote:
I always use something like:
send myAdd pArrayA to stack someStack
so that the variable is evaluated before the send.
Hi, Sarah!
I'll pick on two aspects of that.
First of all, I
Revolution seems to be my solution for writing business apps. I am a business
person, not a professional programmer, but I create all of my internal apps,
currently in Foxpro/DOS. A couple of questions:
The description says the program creates stand alone executables. To me
this means no
I'm sure you'll get lots of answers...and opinions on this one. Here's my
best first shot.
On 5/21/06, John R. Sowden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Revolution seems to be my solution for writing business apps. I am a
business
person, not a professional programmer, but I create all of my internal
At this point we have no plans to videotape any sessions because of the
logistics and deployment issues we ran into last year with almost zero
response from the community.
Audio may happen but video probably won't, at least not predictably and for
resale.
On 5/21/06, Sivakatirswami [EMAIL
Peter T. Evens originally wrote:
Is there another way to isolate the decimal portion?
On 5/20/06, Scott Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's one way (I bet there are more):
get char offset(.,tNumber) to -1 of tNumber
set the itemDelimiter to .
--item 1 is the integer
--item 2 is
Welcome to the list, John.
John R. Sowden wrote:
Revolution seems to be my solution for writing business apps. I am a business
person, not a professional programmer, but I create all of my internal apps,
currently in Foxpro/DOS. A couple of questions:
The description says the program
Dan's already voiced his opinions, so I'll add a few of my own:
On 5/22/06, John R. Sowden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am a business person, not a professional programmer, but I create all of
my internal apps,
currently in Foxpro/DOS.
I use Rev as a hobby, never taken a computer/programming
27 matches
Mail list logo
