Hiya,
Content aside, that's one of the best written texts I've seen in a
long while.
If this comes naturally to you, that's a gift. If you've worked at
it, the craftsmanship shows.
This is written regardless of personal opinion (that's should not be
taken to imply anything).
Cheers,
I came across this a few years ago, and discovered that there's an
extra tag required in the plist for the application before it can be
chosen as an allowed program.
Unfortunately I can't remember any more details, except that the tag
name was something like CIExecutable. It definitely
Hiya,
You could bypass using Parental Controls with Server Admin Tools,
it's not just for servers (free from Apple):
http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/serveradmintools1047.html
Cheers,
Luis.
On 12 Oct 2007, at 13:20, Ian Wood wrote:
I came across this a few years ago, and
Hi Mark,
Thanks a lot for that, I managed to get it working in time for the demo!
I've re-structured it quite a bit, I need to fix a few problems, then
I'll release it back. I've made it a lot more general purpose and
much easier to use.
Thanks Again
All the Best
Dave
Richard,
I agree with Luis, very well written! Regarding a compelling must-have
business case to give you, well, there are a LOT of talented programmers
in this forum and I'd hate to miss out on a good idea (if you catch my
drift).
So, a simple question: Why should Runtime Revolution build a
I think the thread subject on this is actually about Flash, but here is
the snippet I'm responding to, from Mikey,
Ajax, AIR, Flash. All are ways to make rich internet apps, and all
are being accepted as reasonable ways and standards. So, if RR was
going to develop a way to
Hello Friends,
this topic begins the week of web app related articles and posts by
yours truly. Encouraged by the previous topics in the previous emails about
web application, I'll quickly talk about one of the caveats of building web
application server with revolution and propose a solution.
Fascinating stuff! Thanks Andre! I'm sure many besides me appreciate
your sharing this.
Phil Davis
Andre Garzia wrote:
Hello Friends,
this topic begins the week of web app related articles and posts...
Now a solution. Yes, I do have a solution that actually solves everything.
With Apache
Brilliant paper, Andre!
Since you are fast becoming one of the leading authorities on
connecting things Rev and the Web, shouldn't it be you, Andre, that
does what Jerry Daniels and Chipp Walters have done: Made a product
so important, unique and compelling that Revolution, Inc. would have
I would like to add that while Richard has sort of pre-answered my
question, with a very thoughtful post, I still wish I could run a rev
app in a browser.
So basically, my comment is, I wish it _were_ on the horizon.
___
use-revolution
Hiya,
Are you logged in with Admin rights?
Cheers,
Luis.
On 12 Oct 2007, at 12:38, andreas wrote:
Hello Mark
thanks for your hint. However the point is the following. If I
follow your advice and choose my app (which is not listed, but can
be selected under Other...) then OS X pops up
Wait for the demo phil!!! ;-)
it will rock! :D
Cheers and thanks for the kind words.
Andre
On 10/12/07, Phil Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fascinating stuff! Thanks Andre! I'm sure many besides me appreciate
your sharing this.
Phil Davis
Andre Garzia wrote:
Hello Friends,
this
Hello Friends,
Again we touch the topic of revolution, plugins, flash and the web. This
topic always appear, not because we're stubborn but because it is hot and
current. I'll not repeat all things the other mails said but will try to
propose a simple solution that can be attained now with the
Sadhunathan Nadesan wrote:
I would like to add that while Richard has sort of pre-answered my
question, with a very thoughtful post, I still wish I could run a rev
app in a browser.
Indeed.
Andre told me about http://www.extjs.com ... I might end up
spending a lot more time using that app!
Thank you Derek and Luis for the very kind words.
Derek Bump wrote:
Why should a company choose to program in Revolution when they
can use technologies that already work within a web browser?
Same reason they would choose RealBASIC or XCode or Visual Studio: they
need to make desktop apps.
I agree with Ken, but for a different reason, unless I slept partway
through his post.
Ajax, AIR, Flash. All are ways to make rich internet apps, and all
are being accepted as reasonable ways and standards. So, if RR was
going to develop a way to move apps to the web, I would argue that it
is
Hello Mark
thanks for your hint. However the point is the following. If I follow
your advice and choose my app (which is not listed, but can be
selected under Other...) then OS X pops up a message like Can't
add this app to the list of allowed programms.
It seems, that a Revolution
Hello again
I have made some research and progress towards the export to flash
SWF files.
However I got stuck into the creation of the file where it is needed
to have bit level access and editing capabilities.
The simple question is Within Revolution how can I edit a
string of
Sannyasin Sivakatirswami wrote:
Andre told me about http://www.extjs.com ... I might end up
spending a lot more time using that app!
Now this is what I'm talking about! Something like Ext JS should be
available for Revolution. The ability to create a stack, and then embed
it within a web page.
What about a Rev cgi running the Rev web UI? It shouldn't need
translation to JavaScript. And the Rev web UI: From what I've seen the
cards are XML. I've given some time to try to translate these but didn't
bother after a while.
Cheers,
Luis.
Andre Garzia wrote:
Hello Friends,
Again we
Oops, forgot to mention this link:
http://blog.reindel.com/2007/10/11/adobe-air-answers-a-question-that-nobody-is-asking/
Cheers,
Luis.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe,
Pleasure. Had to be said.
I think most of this might stem from hopeful developers, especially
newbies looking at the Rev platform and its deployment capabilities,
hoping that it will also go that extra step.
Something like my gripe with audio (have to drag that back up again...):
I saw its
Le 10 oct. 07, à 14:39, Henk van der Velden a écrit :
Hi Eric,
I've tried that already, but without succes.
Urlencode turns pdtex 1-2.jpg into pdtex+1-2.jpg. However this
doesn't display the file and it doesn't produce an error message
either.
same thing for me (macOS 10.3.9): the
i just googled URL encoding and I got
http://www.blooberry.com/indexdot/html/topics/urlencoding.htm
my 2 cents
Francois Chaplais
http://cas.ensmp.fr/~chaplais/
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to
On Oct 12, 2007, at 5:41 PM, François Chaplais wrote:
same thing for me (macOS 10.3.9): the output of URLEncode is
unusable.
Hi François,
I think there is some confusion of what urlencode is intended for due
to the documentation. In Revolution urlencode is meant for encoding
the query
Luis wrote:
Something like my gripe with audio (have to drag that back up again...):
I saw its audio capabilities but didn't check it out fully, so I got
stuck halfway and then gave it up. It seems like such a small step, yet
it's not there.
I have my own issues with audio in Rev. What were
The frequency controls are dire and there is no way to control the
balance. I thought the QT external would help, and it does cover he
balance aspect, but not the frequency: He's actually posted up a bug
report for this.
I was going to call an external application to do this or mess around
On 10/13/07, Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But the question is not necessarily limited to Can we have a browser
plugin for Rev?
Maybe a better question would be to step back and look at the bigger
picture, asking, How can Rev contribute to my web development?
That reminds me.
28 matches
Mail list logo
