Sean, I think this is a great idea. Not only would it centralize
documentation for different libraries, but it could also serve as a
kind of advert/reminder of those libraries.
Many users of this list have written a wide variety of helpful
libraries. If these libraries could have their
Hey all,
I just try to implement a life search on a datagrid. I was doing this
with the dgtext property. However this turns out to be too slow on
elder machines if there are many records (30k +) Now I am trying to
instead of setting the dgtext, to work with the dgdata. This could
speed
On Aug 5, 2009, at 3:16 PM, Malte Brill wrote:
Also I´d like the runtime on your machines, especially Macs pre
Intel era.
17 PB PPC G4 2 GB Ram mac os version: 10.5.7
84 ms
sims
___
use-revolution mailing list
Sean, this is a really great things!
I contact you off-list on how to integrate your extension inside NativeDoc.
Damien Girard
Dam-pro, France.
http://www.dam-pro.com - Check out the new website!
Message du 05/08/09 10:57
De : Bernard Devlin
A : How to use Revolution
Copie à :
Objet : Re:
Malte,
I don't know if there would be any improvement in what I am telling you but
what if you combined the array, filtered the lines and split up again?
Andre
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Malte Brill revolut...@derbrill.de wrote:
Hey all,
I just try to implement a life search on a
I'm getting ready to distribute a Mac only standalone that has some
stacks that I'll need to put into a folder within the Application
support folder. Would it be a good choice to make my own installer
program with Rev and suck up the App and all needed stacks into custom
properties, then upon
Malte,
On my machine, your original code took between 28 and 31 milisecs,
this code here:
on mouseUp
local testarray,tprocess,test
repeat with i=1 to 3
put any item of meier,müller,john,doe into testarray[i][name]
end repeat
answer the number of lines of the keys of
Sivakatirswami-
Well, your tCompleted also remains constant - it's just the ratio of
download locations that changes. Which makes sense, since what you're
displaying is
line 1: tRevHits
line 2: tCompleted - tRevHits
Also, are you really saying put (1quote200 ) into tCompleteCode?
Shouldn't that
Malte, using your original handler I was getting an approx time of
22ms. Creating a new array instead of deleting the variable (see
below) gives me an approx time of 7ms.
Will that work for you? It's very significantly faster.
Powerbook G4 PPC 1.67ghz
Bernard
on mouseUp
local
Greetings,
Is there a simple cookbook list somewhere of how to convert a stand
alone application to a web application? Something like
1) recompile using these settings
2) put this code on your web page
3) put your executable here on the server
4) you are done
or similar?
Mahalo
Sadhu
Andre-
Wednesday, August 5, 2009, 8:34:36 AM, you wrote:
I don't know if there would be any improvement in what I am telling you but
what if you combined the array, filtered the lines and split up again?
I thought so too, but the combine operator seems to be pretty slow. In
addition, I
Malte-
Here's my attempt. Putting the results into a variable instead of an
array element seems to shave about 25% off the total run time. I'm
assuming you want the results here rather than just a count - doing a
total count is quite a bit faster than accumulating the actual hits.
on mouseUp
On Aug 5, 2009, at 1:01 PM, stgoldb...@aol.com wrote:
Does anyone know of a workaround for this problem, or whether Apple
plans
to update its Quicktime Player to support QTVR on new Windows
computers?
I filed a bug report on this and have been exchanging emails with
someone at Apple over
Malte,
Beyond the ideas already presented, the only thing I can think of -
and this would be a bit of work - is that if there are particular
fields you know you will want to filter on, you could maintain a
*sorted* copy of dgdata. For example, if you had a copy of dgdata
sorted by name,
Hi list
Here is a very simple script :
on mouseUp
put empty into fld resultat
set itemDel to /
put item 1 to -2 of the effective fileName of this stack into tPath
set itemDel to comma
put tPath into fld resultat
end mouseUp
In the IDE, it gives the right path
when I build a
The Multi dimensional array filtering thread reminded me of a
benchmarking test I've been wanting to do for some time, and since I
have some tasks coming up on a client project which needs this sort of
stuff it was a good time to dive in.
The goal is simple enough: one of the most common
Yves COPPE wrote:
Here is a very simple script :
on mouseUp
put empty into fld resultat
set itemDel to /
put item 1 to -2 of the effective fileName of this stack into tPath
set itemDel to comma
put tPath into fld resultat
end mouseUp
In the IDE, it gives the right path
Mark Wieder wrote:
Sivakatirswami-
Well, your tCompleted also remains constant - it's just the ratio of
download locations that changes. Which makes sense, since what you're
displaying is
line 1: tRevHits
line 2: tCompleted - tRevHits
Also, are you really saying put (1quote200 ) into
On Aug 5, 2009, at 3:05 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Any thoughts on how I might optimize the array functions? Did I
just overlook something obvious which would make them run faster?
Richard,
The main slowdown in your test for GetFromMainArray seems to be in
transferring the data from the
Tip:
There are globals, script locals, and handler locals.
Globals belong to Revolution, not the stack or script that created
them in memory.
These values persist even if the stack is removed from memory.
Script locals are kept in memory as long as the stack is open.
In a way. like globals,
Trevor DeVore wrote:
On Aug 5, 2009, at 3:05 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Any thoughts on how I might optimize the array functions? Did I
just overlook something obvious which would make them run faster?
Richard,
The main slowdown in your test for GetFromMainArray seems to be in
I had hoped that I might be able to get around the need to copy the
data out of the properties by using array notation directly on those
properties, but alas it doesn't seem the property array syntax is
yet parallel with variable array syntax as it used to be before we
got
Richard,
I have nothing to add directly to the chunk vs array discussion
(Trevor's reply was very good) but I have often found it helpful to
increase the speed of compound selections by breaking them into
individual ones.
For instance if you have a large database of names and sexes and
Anyone know if the new Dragon speech recognition/dictation app for the
Mac, MacSpeech Dictate -- which is getting fairly good reviews --
will pour text into a field in a rev stack? I'd like to confirm that
this will work before I shell out $200 for this thing, since my main
use of it will
Is there a simple cookbook list somewhere of how to convert a stand alone
application to a web application? Something like
1) recompile using these settings
2) put this code on your web page
3) put your executable here on the server
4) you are done
1. Go to Standalone settings - Web and
Hi Peter,
Yes MacSpeech Dictate version 1.3 works great with Revolution. I just
finished talking into
a scrolling field in Pre-beta 4.0 with no problems at all.
Rick
On Aug 5, 2009, at 7:16 PM, Peter Brigham MD wrote:
Anyone know if the new Dragon speech recognition/dictation app for
Jim Ault wrote:
Tip:
There are globals, script locals, and handler locals.
Globals belong to Revolution, not the stack or script that created
them in memory.
These values persist even if the stack is removed from memory.
Script locals are kept in memory as long as the stack is open.
In a
Not only would it centralize documentation for different libraries,
Which is the main point of it, even for my own libraries I forget
what they do ;)
Many users of this list have written a wide variety of helpful
libraries.
Yes and I use many of them in my personal toolbox thank you
Is the onrev client available as a stack?
I'd like to modify it to suit my own way of working.
--
Nicolas Cueto
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
29 matches
Mail list logo