On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Shao Sean wrote:
> please share with us how did you add a control
>> to the toolbar as well, I liked that.
>>
> copy group ;-)
I am going *CRAZY* with copy groups now... life is so much easier!
--
http://www.andregarzia.com All We Do Is Code.
___
On Aug 11, 2010, at 2:00 AM, Shao Sean wrote:
> still low standards but here are a couple little teaser videos of stuff i
> have been working on..
...
> the controls are 100% revTalk and are hidden in compiled applications..
There are tears in my eyes! I am SO ready for these!
Low standards! Ha
Thank you for suggestions but I am still having trouble.
I have a Stack that has thirty Cards containing multiple choice questions. On
Four of these thirty Cards I have a Field named "Results" that contains the
users answers for each section. On each of the four Cards that has the field
"R
gt; >
> > > put "Done." && the long date && the long time into theMessage
> > > replace "{message}" with theMessage in thePage
> > > put thePage
> > > ?>
> > >
> >
> > Gregory,
> >
> > The
sage
> > replace "{message}" with theMessage in thePage
> > put thePage
> > ?>
> >
>
> Gregory,
>
> The POST operation is not setting the cookie. As you can see here:
>
> http://andregarzia.com/shots/Cookie_Result-20100815-203217.jpg
>
>
> replace "{message}" with theMessage in thePage
> put thePage
> ?>
>
Gregory,
The POST operation is not setting the cookie. As you can see here:
http://andregarzia.com/shots/Cookie_Result-20100815-203217.jpg
The set-cookie header is not coming thru. Try loosing the pat
Yes, Mark,
"wait 0 secs with messages" is better.
The "NULL Hypothesis" is a bit strange but we have encountered many
problems (data disappearing, sorts not working right, filters
filtering too much) all of which were fixed by striping NULLs from
the data before performing the action. Now it
Hi,
"wait 0 secs" really should be "wait 0 secs with messages" to have the effect
you want.
Stripping the NULLs is an interesting idea, but there is no way to do this
inside of HC as far as I know and removing _ALL_ NULLs might break the stack.
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Ta
On 8/15/10 4:06 AM, Jim Ault wrote:
I would recommend doing some sort of audit trail on the two versions,
such as
Version running in Hypercard:
repeat with x = 1 to the number of cards
go card x
put the short id of this card & "^" & the name of this card & cr after
masterList
end repeat
put th
Yes, the missing algorithm.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Of course, everything everyone is recommending is against a copy of the
original stack. Make a copy, try something, like a compact, and then save that
copy. Then use that copy and do a second compact, save that copy, etc. When
doing this kind of recover I normally keep a log of the versions and
Richard,
We've done a lot of large HC to Rev conversions and have run into the
same problem.
1. Make sure the original HC stack has been compacted, several times
2. Strip all NULLs before import. These can get into the data if a
user has pasted text into the HC fields from Word or some other
I'd like to emulate the behavior of some software which allows you to draw
rough shapes by hand and recognises whether you want to draw a circle,
triangle, rectangle etc. The tools would allow you to use the freehand pen
polygon tool to sketch and then replace the sketch with an appropriately
place
Sorry for messing up the link in my previous post.
> Hi Richard,
>
> According to the documentation, the number of cards in a Revolution stack is
> only limited by the amount of available memory. I can imagine that a stack
> with 119000 cards becomes rather big once converted to Revolution. Per
Hi Richard,
According to the documentation, the number of cards in a Revolution stack is
only limited by the amount of available memory. I can imagine that a stack with
119000 cards becomes rather big once converted to Revolution. Perhaps it indeed
doesn't fit in memory. It is also possible tha
I would recommend doing some sort of audit trail on the two versions,
such as
Version running in Hypercard:
repeat with x = 1 to the number of cards
go card x
put the short id of this card & "^" & the name of this card & cr
after masterList
end repeat
put the number of lines in maste
I am not a professional programmer but had worked with Hypercard from
its inception, and went over to Revolution as soon as I became aware of
its existence.
I have been able to convert most of my stacks flawlessly, with one
exception. In the late 1990s I produced a stack for a research proje
17 matches
Mail list logo