No, by all means warn them, but the warning should be something like, the
project leader has been having problems for a while. The team has finally
come to the point of action and is acting to get the situation resolved and
take things forward - probably in the end without him. Something to be
It is _the_ primary strength of free software solutions (in the strict
GPL/LGPL sense) that one is not at a dead end if a project has only
one primary developer and that person no longer continues development.
One has access to the source code and can continue development. If
the source of a
They'll work through it. Sad as it is, the team should have taken action
quite a while ago - well, they apparently did take some sort of action quite
a while back, but didn't do it forcefully or urgently enough. In a month or
so, the thing will probably be resolved and with more precautions to
Hi,
Sad is it, I am running CentOS as development workstation for its
maturity and like it. (I had just to compile Mono to have the latest
version).
Personnaly I am using thoses operating system, and each ones have its
usages:
- Graphical development: Windows. (Yes I like Windows).
-
More preciously : Rev 2.1.2 is the last version to run on Solaris.
Perhaps would it be usefull to have it compiled again for this
platform, as a marketing effort, at least, to help to let RevServe be
seen as a professional grade alternative to Tomcat or PHP.
Pierre
--
Pierre Sahores
Our department has been using CentOS (which is what I'm logged into at the
moment) for our departmental server for at least a year now with no
problems that I've heard of.
The news about the head going Away WithOut Leave is disconcerting, as my
neighbor's employer, a pretty good sized monthly
Isn't that what the CENTOS people were trying to do on their site, to get
everyone to calm down?
Speculation could kill a good product. A warning like that to possibly
non-technical people could elicit panic.
-
Stephen Barncard
San Francisco
http://barncard.com
Are you saying that you wouldn't want to be warned?
Judy
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, stephen barncard wrote:
Isn't that what the CENTOS people were trying to do on their site, to get
everyone to calm down?
Speculation could kill a good product. A warning like that to possibly
non-technical people
Well by saying 'warned' you already put a spin on something that may not be
that big a deal. The only problem is with the website domain name,
really
I've already stuck my nose in too far... never mind
-
Stephen Barncard
San Francisco
http://barncard.com
Hi all,
My conclusion after reading the CentOS web site is: CentOS is dead.
What indicates that this conclusion is wrong?
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
http://economy-x-talk.com
Submit your software products to
Because in this fast-paced internet world of ours, rumor and innuendo spread
fast, either from not knowing all the facts, making assumptions, or not
reading all of the information, leads to the needless destruction of
reputations and livelihoods.
Why spread fear about something we don't really
Thanks, Stephen. I had not seen that, when I visited the site yesterday.
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
http://economy-x-talk.com
Submit your software products to http://www.quickestpublisher.com and
get found!
If you sent me an e-mail
Hello Folks,
I am bringing this here since with the introduction of RevWeb and RevServer,
many here will be jumping on the webserver bandwagon. You can always opt to
go using On-Rev which is a fantastic service for both value and features.
There are cases where you will want to own your own
13 matches
Mail list logo
