Noted and voted.
DNA
On May 28, 2006, at 3:35 AM, David Vaughan wrote:
On 28/05/2006, at 1:24, Devin Asay wrote:
OTOH, documentation errors are easy to fix. I recently stumbled
across a minor doco error in one of the revDB functions and
submitted it to BZ. Lo and behold it showed up as
On 28/05/2006, at 1:24, Devin Asay wrote:
OTOH, documentation errors are easy to fix. I recently stumbled
across a minor doco error in one of the revDB functions and
submitted it to BZ. Lo and behold it showed up as fixed in the next
2.7.x release. You should submit it for sure. I would
On May 26, 2006, at 10:21 PM, David Vaughan wrote:
On 27/05/2006, at 12:30, Kay C Lan wrote:
...
...BUT once you move
away from these, moving back to them using 'previous' or 'next'
will not
result in them be recognised, you need to try an move past them, then
they'll be recognised.
I
Using Rev 2.7.1 with AltSqlite/SQLite 3, I found inconsistent
behaviour (as I see it) with the function revdb_isbof alias
RevCurrentRecordIsFirst.
Let us assume you find a record set comprising one record.
-- revdb_isbof will be true (expected)
-- revdb_iseof will be false (not expected)
--- David Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using Rev 2.7.1 with AltSqlite/SQLite 3, I found
inconsistent
behaviour (as I see it) with the function
revdb_isbof alias
RevCurrentRecordIsFirst.
Let us assume you find a record set comprising one
record.
-- revdb_isbof will be true
On 26/05/2006, at 19:02, Jan Schenkel wrote:
I remember an old discussion about when exactly you
were at the end of a cursor: on the last record, or
after you call revdb_movenext on the last record?
FoxPro seemed to think that the EOF() was _after_ the
last record, not on it.
I do not
On 5/26/06, Jan Schenkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I remember an old discussion about when exactly you
were at the end of a cursor: on the last record, or
after you call revdb_movenext on the last record?
FoxPro seemed to think that the EOF() was _after_ the
last record, not on it.
I
On 27/05/2006, at 12:30, Kay C Lan wrote:
...
...BUT once you move
away from these, moving back to them using 'previous' or 'next'
will not
result in them be recognised, you need to try an move past them, then
they'll be recognised.
I recognise it but it leaves me thinking that the old
