Hi everyone,
I have a rather odd problem using rev applications on Mac OSX Leopard,
connecting to a server on my network. I connect to a server with an Applescript
command: do theScript as Applescript. I can do this just fine. But if I unmount
the server by dragging it's icon to the trash
On Feb 5, 2010, at 2:19 PM, Dan Soneson wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have a rather odd problem using rev applications on Mac OSX
Leopard, connecting to a server on my network. I connect to a server
with an Applescript command: do theScript as Applescript. I can do
this just fine. But if I
2010/2/5 Dan Soneson soneso...@southernct.edu:
Hi everyone,
I have a rather odd problem using rev applications on Mac OSX Leopard,
connecting to a server on my network. I connect to a server with an
Applescript command: do theScript as Applescript. I can do this just fine.
But if I
2010/2/6 zryip theSlug zryip.thes...@gmail.com:
Hi Dan,
To resolve your problem you could use a try statement like this:
set myVolume to /Volumes/George
try
do shell script ls myVolume
-- check if the volume /Volumes/George exists. If the volume
.
regards
Bernd
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Mac-OSX-Leopard-and-server-connections-tp1470797p1470939.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution
I have a rather odd problem using rev applications on Mac OSX Leopard,
connecting to a server on my network. I connect to a server with an
Applescript command: do theScript as Applescript. I can do this just fine.
But if I unmount the server by dragging it's icon to the trash, then remount
a rather odd problem using rev applications on Mac OSX
Leopard, connecting to a server on my network. I connect to a
server with an Applescript command: do theScript as Applescript. I
can do this just fine. But if I unmount the server by dragging
it's icon to the trash, then remount from
I am getting my first exposure to a computer running Snow Leopard and
just discovered two things that don't seem to work
SMTP
FTP uploading
Rev 3.5 installed, running in the IDE, no luck.
Compiled app, no luck
Is there something I should read before digging into details about
firewalls
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Jim Ault jimaultw...@yahoo.com wrote:
I am getting my first exposure to a computer running Snow Leopard and just
discovered two things that don't seem to work
SMTP
FTP uploading
Rev 3.5 installed, running in the IDE, no luck.
Compiled app, no luck
On Jan 22, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Sarah Reichelt wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Jim Ault jimaultw...@yahoo.com
wrote:
I am getting my first exposure to a computer running Snow Leopard
and just
discovered two things that don't seem to work
SMTP
FTP uploading
Rev 3.5 installed, running
Hiya,
Have you tried Synergy+ ?
http://code.google.com/p/synergy-plus/
Cheers,
Luis.
On 18 Nov 2009, at 02:06, Scott Rossi wrote:
Recently, Pierre Sahores wrote:
The SynergyKM-1.0b7-Installer.dmg package include the 1.3.1 Synergy
version + 1 OSX preference pane so you don't need to edit
Luis wrote:
Hiya,
Have you tried Synergy+ ?
http://code.google.com/p/synergy-plus/
Wow! This looks really sexy.
Currently I have a G4 Mac, A Pentium 3 running XP
and an HP Pentium 4 running Ubuntu 8.04.3; with the
XP box headless and controlled via Microsoft Remote
Desktop Connection. I
Recently, Luis wrote:
Have you tried Synergy+ ?
http://code.google.com/p/synergy-plus/
Yes, I have it, thanks. Will have to try it again. I can't tell if 1.3.4
overwrites 1.3.1, or gets installed alongside. Set up is quite arcane
without being able to use SynergyKM (which worked fine for
We've had some discussion here about the Rev IDE breaking under Snow
Leopard; specifically, in v3.5 double-clicking a .rev file would launch
Rev okay but Rev wouldn't open the file.
IIRC at the heart of the problem was that the file paths passed to the
app in the odoc event were
--- On Tue, 11/17/09, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com wrote:
We've had some discussion here about
the Rev IDE breaking under Snow Leopard; specifically, in
v3.5 double-clicking a .rev file would launch Rev okay but
Rev wouldn't open the file.
IIRC at the heart of the problem
Anybody have the screen-sharing software Synergy running on OSX Snow
Leopard? I can't seem to get any systems other than Macs to connect. Am
pretty sure I have the latest version 1.3.1 running on the various systems,
but get errors on the Windows side (forcibly rejected connections) and some
Richard,
I still have the problem with 10.6.2 (v3.5 engine). Rev 4 engine recompile
fixes it without any code changes on my part.
Bill
On Nov 17, 2009, at 11:37 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
We've had some discussion here about the Rev IDE breaking under Snow Leopard;
specifically, in v3.5
Hi Scott,
Did you upgrade to the last version of SynergyKM-1.0b7-Installer.dmg
witch seems to work fine under Snow-Leopard (i did'nt test) ?
http://sourceforge.net/projects/synergykm/files/
Best Regards,
Pierre
Le 18 nov. 09 à 01:31, Scott Rossi a écrit :
Anybody have the screen-sharing
Recently, Pierre Sahores wrote:
Did you upgrade to the last version of SynergyKM-1.0b7-Installer.dmg
witch seems to work fine under Snow-Leopard (i did'nt test) ?
I think I have gone through 5 downloads of Synergy and I don't know what
version I have now -- I just know it's 1.3.1 or later
-1.0b7-Installer.dmg
witch seems to work fine under Snow-Leopard (i did'nt test) ?
I think I have gone through 5 downloads of Synergy and I don't know
what
version I have now -- I just know it's 1.3.1 or later! :-)
I can get SynergyKM to install, but when using it I cannot get any
clients
Recently, Pierre Sahores wrote:
The SynergyKM-1.0b7-Installer.dmg package include the 1.3.1 Synergy
version + 1 OSX preference pane so you don't need to edit them by end
anymore ,-)
Well, using SynergyKM, I cannot get any systems to connect. If I configure
manually I can get systems to
How long will it be before RunRev works with Snow Leopard without needing
Rosetta (like other major programs)?
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Sandra HARGROVE sandr...@comcast.netwrote:
Hi,
This is how you solve the opening problems with Revolution on Macs using
Snow Leopard.
1) Go back
Reminds me of the Hypercard days... Can't upgrade my computer now.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Sandra HARGROVE sandr...@comcast.netwrote:
Hi,
This is how you solve the opening problems with Revolution on Macs using
Snow Leopard.
1) Go back to the original Snow Leopard System
Runrev doesn't require Rosetta, and hasn't done so for *years*.
Sandra was just giving a slightly bizarre workaround for the double-
click to open bug.
Ian
On 27 Oct 2009, at 14:43, william humphrey wrote:
How long will it be before RunRev works with Snow Leopard without
needing
Rosetta
The only thing that doesn't seem to work so far, is opening your rev stacks by
double-clicking the icon in the finder; you can still open these files
perfectly fine from within the Rev IDE.
I wouldn't exactly call that a reason to abstain from upgrading to Snow
Leopard. It's just a minor
Actually, the work-around that Sandra offered works because the
problem is in the intel code and the way Snow Leopard and RunRev
interact. Until a permanent solution is distributed, running Rev
under Rosetta (using the PPC code) works.
Marc Siskin
On Oct 27, 2009, at 10:46 AM, Ian Wood
On Oct 27, 2009, at 3:48 PM, Jan Schenkel wrote:
It's just a minor deficiency caused by a not-backward-compatible
change Apple applied to the 'odoc' AppleEvent.
I wonder if this affects drag drop and/or other functionality in Rev
standalones?
Anyone have an opinion?
sims
Hi,
This is how you solve the opening problems with Revolution on Macs
using Snow Leopard.
1) Go back to the original Snow Leopard System application disk and
load the program called Rossetta. In the new Mac version it is
included separately on the disk.
2) Once it is loaded, select your
Hi Rev Addicts,
I just upgraded my system software from Tiger to Snow Leopard. The first
thing I noticed of course is the different way it renders Metal Texture.
It's much to dark now. Is there a way to lighten it somewhat? Alternatively,
how do I set the background color of my stacks? Thanks
software from Tiger to Snow Leopard. The
first
thing I noticed of course is the different way it renders Metal
Texture.
It's much to dark now. Is there a way to lighten it somewhat?
Alternatively,
how do I set the background color of my stacks? Thanks for all your
support in
the past
their unique value, they
increase ours. :)
Very quotable! Thanks, Richard.
Seems like the detailed files no longer returns filetype info in Snow
Leopard. Wandering how to get this - would it not be good if the engine
moved over to using spotlight for OSX? I guess according to the above
For a very useful and readable summary of this issue, see:
http://db.tidbits.com/article/10537
-- Peter
Peter M. Brigham
pmb...@gmail.com
http://home.comcast.net/~pmbrig
On Sep 13, 2009, at 10:56 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
stephen barncard wrote:
As a long time mac user from the beginning,
Thaknks!
Am 13.09.2009 um 04:54 schrieb Sarah Reichelt:
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Till Bandi tba...@swissonline.ch
wrote:
I just installed snow leopard - and now I can't launch a stack with
a double
click anymore from the finder. I get the dialog:
Unable to open stack: stack
I read a messarge regarding Problems with Snow Leopard:
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Till Bandi tba...@swissonline.ch wrote:
I just installed snow leopard - and now I can't launch a stack with a double
click anymore from the finder. I get the dialog:
Unable to open stack: stack
Isn't there a speed hit running under Rosetta?
-
Stephen Barncard
San Francisco
http://houseofcubes.com/disco.irev
2009/9/13 sandr...@comcast.net
I read a messarge regarding Problems with Snow Leopard:
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Till Bandi tba
sandrah9 wrote:
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Till Bandi wrote:
I just installed snow leopard - and now I can't launch a stack with
a double click anymore from the finder. I get the dialog:
Unable to open stack: stack is corrupted, check for ~ backup file.
If I open the same stack
I haven't installed Snow Leopard, so can't check this.
I've read that with Snow Leopard, the Finder no longer uses creator
and type codes as a way of linking files to applications. I'm guessing
this might have an effect of the result of double-clicking on a file.
For example, perhaps
: I haven't installed Snow Leopard, so can't check this. I've
read that with Snow Leopard, the Finder no longer uses creator and type
codes as a way of linking files to applications. I'm guessing this might
have an effect of the result of double-clicking on a file. For example,
perhaps
stephen barncard wrote:
As a long time mac user from the beginning, I've always thought the type and
creator codes were VERY useful to eliminate the ambiguity of what to launch
and I put down the PC method of using suffixes as being brain dead.
Apparently the Mac team did too, as we learned
On Sep 13, 2009, at 7:56 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
With every step Apple takes to eliminate differences between OSes,
the less forked code we need to write. As they decrease their unique
value, they increase ours. :)
Very quotable! Thanks, Richard.
--Jerry J
I just installed snow leopard - and now I can't launch a stack with a
double click anymore from the finder. I get the dialog:
Unable to open stack: stack is corrupted, check for ~ backup file.
If I open the same stack within runrev with the open command,
everything works as expected. If I
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Till Bandi tba...@swissonline.ch wrote:
I just installed snow leopard - and now I can't launch a stack with a double
click anymore from the finder. I get the dialog:
Unable to open stack: stack is corrupted, check for ~ backup file.
If I open the same stack
Thanks for that link, Björnke.
After reading the relevant pages of the Ars Technica review, and going
through the comments, I found a reference to this discussion entry,
which seems to clarify the current situation vis a vis Snow Leopard
(which distinguishes between QT the framework and QT
As far as I know LiveStage Pro/Totally Hip died a couple of years back
(last release 2006 for QT6), presumably because each new version of QT
broke more and more of the interactive features. Dropping support for
Flash tracks was the real killer, but LSP was already dead by then. :-(
Ian
Inevitably I am going to say what I have been banging on about for quite
some time:
I believe it is in Runtime Revolution's interests to free themselves from a
dependence
on Quicktime; preferably rolling their own stuff to handle multimedia:
maybe so that
all the multimedia capabilities offered by
Le 9 sept. 09, à 11:28, Richmond Mathewson a écrit :
Inevitably I am going to say what I have been banging on about for
quite
some time:
I believe it is in Runtime Revolution's interests to free themselves
from a
dependence
on Quicktime; preferably rolling their own stuff to handle
I know that RR's expertise is not in the QT territory; but I still cannot
helpthinking that beyond dependence on operating systems (well . . . Google
Chrome,
Runtime Revolution Doors 95 . . . ) that it would behoove them to be less
rather
than more dependent on external software.
2009/9/9
I have to agree with François.
There is no way that RunRev on their own could produce a multimedia
tool to equal QT. We just have to hope that QT will be developed in
such a way that in the future it will still work with those tools that
edit QT movies. It's a poor show that Apple does not
Bernard Devlin wrote:
There is no way that RunRev on their own could produce a multimedia
tool to equal QT.
I can't imagine they would ever try.
Far better would be to simply make better use of the various APIs
available for Win and Linux.
I like QT for many things, but sometimes I just
Flash - Smash! Poo!
I have a feeling that if we all make an effort we can leverage the revLets
and the web plug-in
to leave Flash far behind.
And, while we are on the subject; there are other, less obvious,ways to
provide animation
and so on on RR. A while back (wait until I am back in Bulgaria
Le 8 sept. 09, à 22:56, Björnke von Gierke a écrit :
On 8 Sep 2009, at 17:05, Trevor DeVore wrote:
I hope there is more logic in the OS X installer then just luck ;-)
It would be nice to find out what the determining factor is.
I don't have snow leper installed, but I've read the ars
Le 8 sept. 09, à 22:56, Björnke von Gierke a écrit :
I don't have snow leper installed, but I've read the ars technica review.
Oh, Gosh, I'm sorry, but this is just TOO GOOD not to pick up on.
presumably that is why several people at the conference were looking rather
pale:
some bad cases
Hi all,
for your interest: Trevors wonderful Enhanced QuickTime external
works fine on OS X 10.6, so does my freeware The Exporter, which
was made with Rev 3.5 and this external :-)
Best
Klaus
--
Klaus Major
http://www.major-k.de
kl...@major.on-rev.com
Hi sims,
On Sep 8, 2009, at 9:19 AM, Klaus Major wrote:
for your interest: Trevors wonderful Enhanced QuickTime external
works fine on OS X 10.6, so does my freeware The Exporter, which
was made with Rev 3.5 and this external :-)
When you upgraded to 10.6 did you have to elect to
When you upgraded to 10.6 did you have to elect to re-install QT 7? If so,
was it obvious where or how to do so?
Yes, you have to choose it, it is not installed by default.
You have to Customize the install to do it.
Did you need to re-register QT 7 to make it QT Pro (assuming you had QT
to choose to install QT7 if you don't have Pro installed
on your current OS X install. I just upgraded two machines to Snow
Leopard last night. When running the 10.6 installer on the laptop with
QT 7 Pro installed QT 7 was automatically checked for install. The
machine without QT7 did
On Sep 8, 2009, at 10:49 AM, Trevor DeVore wrote:
You only have to choose to install QT7 if you don't have Pro
installed on your current OS X install. I just upgraded two machines
to Snow Leopard last night. When running the 10.6 installer on the
laptop with QT 7 Pro installed QT 7
On Sep 8, 2009, at 11:01 AM, Colin Holgate wrote:
On Sep 8, 2009, at 10:49 AM, Trevor DeVore wrote:
You only have to choose to install QT7 if you don't have Pro
installed on your current OS X install. I just upgraded two
machines to Snow Leopard last night. When running the 10.6
On 8 Sep 2009, at 17:05, Trevor DeVore wrote:
I hope there is more logic in the OS X installer then just
luck ;-) It would be nice to find out what the determining factor
is.
I don't have snow leper installed, but I've read the ars technica
review.
Basically there's two things going
Am 08.09.2009 um 22:56 schrieb Björnke von Gierke:
On 8 Sep 2009, at 17:05, Trevor DeVore wrote:
I hope there is more logic in the OS X installer then just
luck ;-) It would be nice to find out what the determining factor
is.
I don't have snow leper
snow LEPER?
C'mon Björnke, it cannot
On Sep 8, 2009, at 5:14 PM, Björnke von Gierke wrote:
That's just how lill steve says the name... but then it might be my
hearing ;)
The same Steve that kept referring to Jag-Wire?
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
On 8 Sep 2009, at 23:01, Klaus on-rev wrote:
snow LEPER?
C'mon Björnke, it cannot be THAT bad! :-D
That's just how lill steve says the name... but then it might be my
hearing ;)
I would have installed it, but the clerk said to me:
it is sold out the second time over already.
--
for
installing alternative codecs, or the ability to hint tracks for RTSP
streaming via QuickTime Streaming Server. That's why Apple includes an
updated version of the previous QuickTime 7.x player as an optional install
in Snow Leopard to handle all of those features.
which would seem to suggest
of the previous QuickTime 7.x player as an optional install
in Snow Leopard to handle all of those features.
which would seem to suggest that if one authors for Mac OS 10.6 one cannot
really rely on Quicktime as we
on Mac 10.4 and 10.5 understand it. This may impinge on how Revolution
leverages
which would seem to suggest that if one authors for Mac OS
10.6 one cannot really rely on Quicktime as we on Mac 10.4
and 10.5 understand it. This may impinge on how Revolution
leverages Quicktime for its multimedia capabilities.
I found this to be interesting:
The new QuickTime Player is fairly neat, and will do most of the
things that most people will need to do. For us who need to do more
complex editing, or adding of multiple tracks and so on, we can
install the QuickTime Player 7.
As for what Rev can play back, it's probably best to just try
In would caution that you are also dealing with a version 1.0 or a very
majory rewrite. It will grow and accumulate fixes, new functionalities and
weirdnesses all its own.
Neal Campbell
Abroham Neal Software
www.dxbase.com
www.abrohamnealsoftware.com
www.sdrsystems.com
(540) 242 0911
Amateur
Hi Colin,
The only things that I know of that QTX has trouble playing
is .MID and QTVR. In RevMedia I can play an old QTVR
panorama, a cubic QTVR, and an MOV with a MID track in it
(Rev hates just MID on its own, but is fine with a MOV that
has a video track and a MID track). This all
On Sep 7, 2009, at 1:29 PM, Lynn Fredricks wrote:
Can you confirm if the QTVRs are working with Quicktime 7 not
installed, or
if it requires Quicktime 7? Also, did you try anything with hotspots?
Not easily, and no to hotspots. Is there a movie online I can try?
Hi Colin,
Can you confirm if the QTVRs are working with Quicktime 7 not
installed, or if it requires Quicktime 7? Also, did you try
anything
with hotspots?
Not easily, and no to hotspots. Is there a movie online I can try?
The VR Worx is a good example site for the various types -
On Sep 7, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Lynn Fredricks wrote:
http://www.vrtoolbox.com/gallery/scene_gallery/scene_gallery.html
I tried the scene one, and an object one, and they both worked fine.
___
use-revolution mailing list
Thanks very much to Sarah and Mark for their help. The user did what
he should have done after the Snow Leopard upgrade seemed to have
caused a problem with my app. He trashed the original and downloaded
a fresh copy. He now reports that Patent Grabber is working fine!
Regards,
Bruce
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your suggestions. Patent Grabber was already installed on
the user's Mac when he upgraded to Snow Leopard. So I am not sure
that the permissions of my standalone would be a problem when it was
working fine until my user's upgrade. Or are you suggesting that my
user
One user of my Patent Grabber application has reported that the app
simply opens and quits now that he has upgraded to Snow Leopard. Here
is his message:
---
Dear Sir,
I upgrade from 10.5 to 10.6 then the patent grabber 5.6 version will
automatic close it when I try
Grabber application has reported that the app
simply opens and quits now that he has upgraded to Snow Leopard.
Here is his message:
---
Dear Sir,
I upgrade from 10.5 to 10.6 then the patent grabber 5.6 version will
automatic close it when I try to open the program.
I
I believe Rev is a Cocoa app and has been for a little while.
Bill Vlahos
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 29, 2009, at 4:47 PM, Peter W A Wood peterwaw...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think there can be little doubt that Revolution is a Carbon
application. The easiest way to tell is when the old black
10 minutes explaining that difference
to a long-time Mac user).
If the need for setting browsers to run as 32 bit is true then anyone
relying on distributing Rev apps is in for a lot of support calls --
especially if browsers on Snow Leopard are running as 32 bit by
default.
The only appropriate
for Revolution
http://www.quartam.com
=
As we grow older, we grow both wiser and more foolish at the same time. (La
Rochefoucauld)
--- On Sun, 8/30/09, Bernard Devlin bdrun...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Bernard Devlin bdrun...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Snow Leopard
To: How to use Revolution use-revolution
False alarm - it was an old version of Default Folder X causing the
problems...
Ian
On 29 Aug 2009, at 21:54, Ian Wood wrote:
Oh cr*p.
Just tested in Rev Studio 3.5 gm2 and RevMedia 4.0.0 on 10.6:
Make new stack.
Add a QT Player object from the tools palette.
Open inspector, click on
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Bernard Devlinbdrun...@gmail.com wrote:
Am I right in understanding that end users need to make a decision as
to whether or not Safari/Firefox runs as 32 bit or 64 bit?
Early adopters of Snow Leopard who are testing the alpha version of
the RunRev plugin
Leopard Safari. Works okay with current version of Firefox.
Was Safari set to 32 bit or 64 bit? Same for Firefox?
I have Safari set to run as 32 bit for 1Password compatibility and
revlets work fine.
I notice, checking in Activity Monitor, that Rev is not 64 bit itself,
so I presume the revWeb
QTVR support has been dropped from QT X. :-(
Ian
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
...talking about Snow Leopard
as you probably know in Snow Leopard there
is a brand new QuickTime X . Many things are different from the previous
player.
In particular, Apple removed the item Export movies from the menu
of the QuickTime X player and, at the same time, Apple removed
On 29 Aug 2009, at 11:22, mazzapa...@libero.it mazzapa...@libero.it
In particular, Apple removed the item Export movies from the menu
of the QuickTime X player and, at the same time, Apple removed many
AppleScript commands for the QuickTime application
The install DVD includes QT7 Player
2009/8/29 François Chaplais francois.chapl...@mines-paristech.fr:
Correct me if I am wrong, but rev is carbon, and carbon did not make the
jump to 64 bits. Moving to 64 bits requires cocoa and hence objective-c.
I could be wrong too, but as I understood it, the apps that appeared
as bundles
Hello,
and PlayCommand agentX (Shakobox) witch use QuickTime and AppleScript
can still working well ?
Thanks
Bons souvenirs de paris
René
Le 29 août 09 à 12:22, mazzapa...@libero.it a écrit :
In particular, Apple removed the item Export movies from the menu
of the QuickTime X player and,
On Aug 29, 2009, at 7:47 AM, Sarah Reichelt wrote:
I could be wrong too, but as I understood it, the apps that appeared
as bundles were Cocoa, which the apps that were in single file were
Carbon. On this basis, Rev the standalones it creates are Cocoa
not Carbon.
Also, the Cocoa detecting
Le 29 août 09 à 13:47, Sarah Reichelt a écrit :
2009/8/29 François Chaplais francois.chapl...@mines-paristech.fr:
Correct me if I am wrong, but rev is carbon, and carbon did not
make the
jump to 64 bits. Moving to 64 bits requires cocoa and hence
objective-c.
I could be wrong too, but as
On Aug 29, 2009, at 4:26 PM, François Chaplais wrote:
Photoshop 7 is a bundle, with MacOSClassic and MacOS folders in
the Contents folder of the bundle.
so IMHO, the existence of a bundle does not imply cocoa.
The operating of scroll bars in the background is Cocoa only though,
isn't it?
Oh cr*p.
Just tested in Rev Studio 3.5 gm2 and RevMedia 4.0.0 on 10.6:
Make new stack.
Add a QT Player object from the tools palette.
Open inspector, click on source/filename button.
Choose a QTVR file on the HD, click 'Open' in the file dialog.
Instant crash for Rev, every time, with regular
Le 29 août 09 à 22:52, Colin Holgate a écrit :
On Aug 29, 2009, at 4:26 PM, François Chaplais wrote:
Photoshop 7 is a bundle, with MacOSClassic and MacOS folders in
the Contents folder of the bundle.
so IMHO, the existence of a bundle does not imply cocoa.
The operating of scroll bars
François Chaplais wrote:
I could be wrong too, but as I understood it, the apps that appeared
as bundles were Cocoa, which the apps that were in single file were
Carbon. On this basis, Rev the standalones it creates are Cocoa
not Carbon.
Photoshop 7 is a bundle, with MacOSClassic and MacOS
On Aug 29, 2009, at 5:31 PM, François Chaplais wrote:
An answer to this question would be welcome from the mothership.
Yes, come on Kevin, don't tell me you're busy preparing for something...
___
use-revolution mailing list
François Chaplais wrote:
I could be wrong too, but as I understood it, the apps that appeared
as bundles were Cocoa, which the apps that were in single file were
Carbon. On this basis, Rev the standalones it creates are Cocoa
not Carbon.
Photoshop 7 is a bundle, with MacOSClassic and MacOS
I think there can be little doubt that Revolution is a Carbon
application. The easiest way to tell is when the old black white
busy cursor can be seen. I've certainly seen it whilst using the
Revolution IDE and I guess it can be seen from Revolution apps.
Regards
Peter
On 30 Aug 2009,
Hi Revolution Lovers,
I know it's early to ask this question. Does anyone know if there are
problems between the Apple Snow Leopard operating system and Revolution, or is
it
safe to upgrade to it?
Thanks in advance,
Joe in Orlando
___
use-revolution
On Aug 28, 2009, at 2:21 PM, lunchnme...@aol.com wrote:
Hi Revolution Lovers,
I know it's early to ask this question. Does anyone know if there are
problems between the Apple Snow Leopard operating system and
Revolution, or is it
safe to upgrade to it?
None that I've seen in limited
I've found just one gotcha so far: the RevWeb plugin does not work
with Snow Leopard Safari. Works okay with current version of Firefox.
With the early advent of Snow Leopard, you can bet there are going to
be a lot of broken apps.
George
On Aug 28, 2009, at 4:29 PM, Devin Asay wrote
On Aug 28, 2009, at 5:36 PM, George C Brackett wrote:
I've found just one gotcha so far: the RevWeb plugin does not work
with Snow Leopard Safari. Works okay with current version of Firefox.
Was Safari set to 32 bit or 64 bit? Same for Firefox
InfoWallet works well in Snow Leopard.
I didn't really expect a problem but I couldn't say so until I tested
it. Its good to see how compatible Revolution is. Makes us look good.
Bill Vlahos
On Aug 25, 2009, at 11:14 PM, Bill Vlahos wrote:
Apple and Microsoft are about to release
1 - 100 of 240 matches
Mail list logo
