David-
Wednesday, January 4, 2006, 9:07:43 AM, you wrote:
> What I am thinking would be a good demonstration of how MVC can add
> to the collaboration possibilities inherent with Revolution is to
> release this for a tree widget.
I'm looking forward to this...
--
-Mark Wieder
[EMAIL PROTECT
On 13 Dec 2005, at 13:40, Dave LeYanna wrote:
Dave Bovill and I have taken somewhat different approaches to a
runrev
implementation of an MVC architecture. I'm not sure if Dave's made
his
public yet, but you can see mine on revonline. You may not like it if
you're used to a traditional MVC c
MisterX-
Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 9:48:23 AM, you wrote:
> Somewhere, things work the same everywhere - the OOP phylosophy
> helps us make that work better in Rev. Yes, not the same way as
> in C++ or real OOP languages. But Object Based Programming is
> definitely not less efficient. And
relate to or relate to others...
cheers
Xavier
http://monsieurx.com/taoo
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Dan Shafer
> Sent: Wednesday, 14 December, 2005 03:33
> To: How to use Revolution
> Subject: Re: MVC
Dave
Short answer (and admittedly over-simplistic) is that Rev doesn't lend
itself to MVC app design and construction. To do true MVC you need an
object-oriented environment, which Rev decidedly is not.
If you want to take the project you describe to MVC, I suggest you look at
an MVC-based ap
Dave-
Tuesday, December 13, 2005, 4:40:57 AM, you wrote:
> Thanks Mark, I'll take a look. I want to put the business rules in the
> model as well. In fact I want to put as much as I can in the model
> because one of the problems we have had over the years is having
> different programmers imple
Thanks Mark, I'll take a look. I want to put the business rules in the
model as well. In fact I want to put as much as I can in the model
because one of the problems we have had over the years is having
different programmers implementing almost the same business logic in
different programs and
Dave-
Monday, December 12, 2005, 12:00:26 PM, you wrote:
> Right now we have created a database in PostgreSQL that maps the dBase
> files as close as we can and have written a "conversion" program to
> create an "import" file to update these PostgreSQL tables with. We also
> have a set of "norma
Right now we have created a database in PostgreSQL that maps the dBase
files as close as we can and have written a "conversion" program to
create an "import" file to update these PostgreSQL tables with. We also
have a set of "normalized" tables in the same PostgreSQL database and we
"massage" t
Dave-
Monday, December 12, 2005, 7:47:09 AM, you wrote:
> I really would like to use MVC if I can because I am on the brink of a
> LARGE project that needs to last a long time and go through a lot of
> contortions by many different programmers over it's lifetime. We are a
> non-profit and I am "c
David;
I read a little about the benefits of using MVC but I had a little
trouble mapping that paradigm to Rev. One of the major issues wasn't
really Rev related but really needed to be thought through and I came up
blank and confused. I want to store as much business logic as I could in
the
11 matches
Mail list logo
