Re: Now a TCP Question

2006-05-27 Thread Jim Ault
Thanks go out to Alex Tweedly, as he kindly and generously invited me to phone him about this complex issue. We had a very good in-depth conversation about the limitations of this TCP server in this instance. Rather than try to troubleshoot that setup on the server end (since I have no control

Re: Now a TCP Question

2006-05-27 Thread Sarah Reichelt
If anyone is interested, I can post a report here, otherwise I will not waste the list bandwidth in this niche application of Rev. Please do post a report, Jim. I haven't had to do this myself, but I can see future projects where it might be the way to go, so I would be very grateful for any

Re: Now a TCP Question

2006-05-27 Thread wouter
On 27 May 2006, at 10:38, Jim Ault wrote: -snip- If anyone is interested, I can post a report here, otherwise I will not waste the list bandwidth in this niche application of Rev. The power and flexibility of Revolution has not ceased to amaze me. Jim Ault Las Vegas -snip- We/I are/am

Re: Now a TCP Question

2006-05-27 Thread Alex Tweedly
wouter wrote: We/I are/am very interested how you will tackle the packet integrity, packet loss, packet order on UDP connection - server and client-wise. Please spoil some bandwidth on this and keep it posted here. Jim can answer for his specific case, but I'll make some general remarks

Re: Now a TCP Question

2006-05-27 Thread wouter
Thank you Alex for this explanation. Greetings, Wouter On 27 May 2006, at 17:43, Alex Tweedly wrote: -very big snip- -- Alex Tweedly http://www.tweedly.net ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this

Now a TCP Question

2006-05-26 Thread Jim Ault
It turns out that the server service has just started a TCP alternative, so I tried Alex Tweedly's TCP server and client. These two stacks run successfully on both the same computer and two that I have on my network, either with DHCP address or each having a static IP address. Now the outside

Re: Now a TCP Question

2006-05-26 Thread Dar Scott
On May 26, 2006, at 12:45 PM, Jim Ault wrote: These two stacks run successfully on both the same computer and two that I have on my network, either with DHCP address or each having a static IP address. Now the outside world... Are you saying you cannot make a TCP connection to a server

Re: Now a TCP Question

2006-05-26 Thread Alex Tweedly
Jim Ault wrote: It turns out that the server service has just started a TCP alternative, so I tried Alex Tweedly's TCP server and client. These two stacks run successfully on both the same computer and two that I have on my network, either with DHCP address or each having a static IP address.