Re: OS9 standalone builds

2008-09-23 Thread Kay C Lan
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 1:48 AM, Jeff Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: also does anyone know if there is a list of the set of features that the 2.6.1 engine cannot do so i can make sure to try to avoid them if i do go to 3.0 for these projects? Sorry for the late reply. One option, in Rev

Re: OS9 standalone builds

2008-09-19 Thread Jeff Reynolds
Scott, I have had no problem making OS9 standalones from the 2.6.1 OSX rev IDE. also worked in earlier versions for me fine from OSX IDE to create the OS9 standalones. I have been working in OSX 2.6.1 IDE for all my projects that need OS9 apps, then take the stack to what ever the most

OS9 standalone builds

2008-09-18 Thread Jeff Reynolds
HI, Has anyone yet converted their rev 3.0 stacks into OS9 classic standalones? is the classic build going to be frozen at 2.6.1 for good now? there was promise that the final classic was going to be in 2.7 or 2.8, but that never seemed to happen (2.8 left it at available soon). i still

Re: OS9 standalone builds

2008-09-18 Thread Richard Gaskin
Jeff Reynolds wrote: is the classic build going to be frozen at 2.6.1 for good now? ... i still have to create mac classic stanalones for the school cdroms as its still a significant market in the elementary schools still holding onto older macs and not going to osx with them... I have

Re: OS9 standalone builds

2008-09-18 Thread Joe Lewis Wilkins
Richard, I started using Rev. with 2.7, so how do I get a copy of 2.6.1? It might be a good idea if this were made common knowledge some way or another, so we don't beat our heads against a stone wall trying to do Classic with later versions of Rev. TIA, Joe Wilkins On Sep 18, 2008, at

Re: OS9 standalone builds

2008-09-18 Thread Chris Sheffield
Hmm, it used to be possible to download old versions from their ftp site at ftp://ftp.runrev.com. But I just tried and it looks like the pub folder is now empty. Anyone? On Sep 18, 2008, at 1:17 PM, Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote: Richard, I started using Rev. with 2.7, so how do I get a copy

Re: OS9 standalone builds

2008-09-18 Thread Richard Gaskin
Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote: I started using Rev. with 2.7, so how do I get a copy of 2.6.1? It might be a good idea if this were made common knowledge some way or another, so we don't beat our heads against a stone wall trying to do Classic with later versions of Rev. The Classic engine is

Re: OS9 standalone builds

2008-09-18 Thread François Chaplais
Le 18 sept. 08 à 20:40, Richard Gaskin a écrit : Jeff Reynolds wrote: is the classic build going to be frozen at 2.6.1 for good now? ... i still have to create mac classic stanalones for the school cdroms as its still a significant market in the elementary schools still holding onto

Re: OS9 standalone builds

2008-09-18 Thread François Chaplais
Le 18 sept. 08 à 22:55, François Chaplais a écrit : I just created a blank stack in Rev 3.0.0 gm-3 and created a Classic standalone; I should be more precise: this is the studio version running on a Mac Book Pro, MacOSX 10.4.11. best François

Re: OS9 standalone builds

2008-09-18 Thread Mark Schonewille
Hi François, I don't think that anything newer than 2.6.1 is able to build standalones for Mac OS 9. With regard to Rev 3.0, I consider this a bug, but I have little hope that it is going to be fixed. A bug report can be found at: http://quality.runrev.com/qacenter/show_bug.cgi?id=6418 --

Re: OS9 standalone builds

2008-09-18 Thread Richard Gaskin
François Chaplais wrote: I just created a blank stack in Rev 3.0.0 gm-3 and created a Classic standalone; the process went fine. I move it from my MacBook Pro to my G4 Cube with a USB key. The app didn't lauch under Classic (within 10.3.9). When rebooted under MacOS 9.2.2, it reported an

Re: OS9 standalone builds

2008-09-18 Thread Scott Morrow
My experience in regards to building OS9 standalones, mirrors that of Mark's. I have never been able to build a working standalone rev app unless I was doing it from within OS9 using rev 2.6.1 (or earlier) Scott Morrow Elementary Software Now with 20% less chalk dust On Sep 18, 2008, at

Re: OS9 standalone builds

2008-09-18 Thread Mark Schonewille
Hi Richard, That doesn't help. It won't work. Rev 2.6.1 is the latest version that creates working standalones for Mac OS 9. The standalones created by Rev 3.0 will not run. There is no need to try, although someone might find out what's wrong with them and come up with a fix. -- Best

Re: OS9 standalone builds

2008-09-18 Thread Richard Gaskin
Mark Schonewille wrote: On 18 sep 2008, at 23:45, Richard Gaskin wrote: As I noted in my last post on this, the file format changed with v2.7, so any stacks used with the v2.6.1 engine must first be saved in the older format. The engine has a built-in property to govern this: the

Re: OS9 standalone builds

2008-09-18 Thread Jeff Reynolds
Richard, actually more worried about the osx and windows versions of the standalones keeping up. i have been solving this by working in the 2.61 IDE and making the classic standalone from that then opening the stack up in the latest rev for then creating the mac and osx versions. rub