Re: OT: Quicktime Bundling

2007-06-11 Thread Josh Mellicker
Apple licenses Quicktime to developers to include with their product for free. There are some mild rules about including logos and whatnot but it's no big deal, we've done this for a decade or so. From http://developer.apple.com/softwarelicensing/agreements/ quicktime.html Selecting

Re: OT: Quicktime Bundling

2007-06-11 Thread Scott Kane
To: How to use Revolution use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Apple licenses Quicktime to developers to include with their product for free. There are some mild rules about including logos and whatnot but it's no big deal, we've done this for a decade or so. Thanks, Josh. :-) Scott Kane

Re: OT: Quicktime Bundling

2007-06-05 Thread David Bovill
No - QTVR, but it does play everything, and it does play most of the QuickTime files I have tried better than QuickTime Player which I still find hard to believe. IMO it would be better to use a VLC based external than QuickTime for the majority of projects. On 02/06/07, Richard Gaskin [EMAIL

Re: OT: Quicktime Bundling

2007-06-05 Thread Mark Talluto
On Jun 2, 2007, at 8:56 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote: Last time I looked into the QuickTime for Linux project it was pretty anemic. Of course so it XAnim. What current video APIs are available for Linux? And in terms of features, how do they compare with QT? Multimedia for all of us is

Re: OT: Quicktime Bundling

2007-06-05 Thread Ian Wood
On 5 Jun 2007, at 22:52, Mark Talluto wrote: VR may require another technology all together. Panorama viewing on Linux is pretty much limited to Java viewers, given the lack of QT, Flash or Shockwave. Ian ___ use-revolution mailing list

Re: OT: Quicktime Bundling

2007-06-05 Thread Richard Gaskin
Mark Talluto wrote: Multimedia for all of us is going to overlap in some areas and be very different in others. At this point I need to be able to play the latest video formats in Linux. MPlayer http://www.mplayerhq.hu/ homepage/design6/news.html seems to be the best bet for audio/video

Re: OT: Quicktime Bundling

2007-06-05 Thread Luis
There is Flash, at least on my Ubuntu build, seen it in SuSe too. Cheers, Luis. On 5 Jun 2007, at 22:58, Ian Wood wrote: On 5 Jun 2007, at 22:52, Mark Talluto wrote: VR may require another technology all together. Panorama viewing on Linux is pretty much limited to Java viewers,

Re: OT: Quicktime Bundling

2007-06-03 Thread Scott Kane
From: Scott Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ship your product with the QuickTime installer so your customers won¹t need to visit the Web to down load it. Get the license. Thanks, Scott - and all. Got the PDF's from Apple. Problem solved it would seem. :-) Scott

Re: OT: Quicktime Bundling

2007-06-02 Thread Eric Chatonet
Hi Scott, I have had the same problem some years ago and asked Apple France at this time: they answered 'No. Sorry'. 'Sorry' because I knew them well ;-) Then I was obliged to run a test at startUp using QTVersion() and a link to the right 'QuickTime for Windows' download page... Le 2

Re: OT: Quicktime Bundling

2007-06-02 Thread Scott Rossi
Recently, Scott Kane wrote: Is it legal for me to bundle QuickTime on a CD for those clients who do not have it and therefore help them avoid the almost 20 meg download? Ship your product with the QuickTime installer so your customers won¹t need to visit the Web to down load it. Get the

Re: OT: Quicktime Bundling

2007-06-02 Thread Mark Talluto
On Jun 2, 2007, at 12:22 AM, Scott Kane wrote: On another note - Linux and QuickTime. Are there any options for a Rev solution using QuickTime to be compiled for Linux and use one of the QuickTime replacements like QuickTime for Linux that seem to exist? Right now we are stuck with

Re: OT: Quicktime Bundling

2007-06-02 Thread Richard Gaskin
Mark Talluto wrote: On Jun 2, 2007, at 12:22 AM, Scott Kane wrote: On another note - Linux and QuickTime. Are there any options for a Rev solution using QuickTime to be compiled for Linux and use one of the QuickTime replacements like QuickTime for Linux that seem to exist? Right now

Re: OT: Quicktime Bundling

2007-06-02 Thread Björnke von Gierke
VLC beats Quicktime in almost every regard, as far as I am concerned. Additionally, one could make an external with libvlc, eliminating the need for a third party install: http://www.videolan.org/developers/vlc/doc/doxygen/html/ group__libvlc.html One caveat is that an external with libvlc

Re: OT: Quicktime Bundling

2007-06-02 Thread Richard Gaskin
Björnke von Gierke wrote: VLC beats Quicktime in almost every regard, as far as I am concerned. Additionally, one could make an external with libvlc, eliminating the need for a third party install: http://www.videolan.org/developers/vlc/doc/doxygen/html/ group__libvlc.html One caveat is

Re: OT: Quicktime Bundling

2007-06-02 Thread Ian Wood
On 2 Jun 2007, at 20:30, Richard Gaskin wrote: VR (scrolling panoramas with definable nodes and spatial callbacks) Nope. VLC is a media player, it doesn't have any interactive features. Ian ___ use-revolution mailing list

OT: Quicktime Bundling

2007-06-01 Thread Scott Kane
Hi folks, This is a little bit off topic, but related to a Rev app I've been building. As the app is multi-media it uses Quick Time extensively. My issue lays with potential Windows users and QuickTime. Many Windows users do not have it (or Itunes) installed. Which would be a major PITA.