Mark Wieder wrote:
Richard-
Thursday, March 18, 2010, 9:15:06 PM, you wrote:
Whether the email is part of the culprit's work or just another victim
like all of us who shouldn't have rec'd that unsolicited email remains
to be seen.
Here's my best-case scenario: the rev team was attempting to
Mark Wieder wrote:
Scott-
Thursday, March 18, 2010, 10:38:13 PM, you wrote:
Dudes, come on. The guy wrote the list on 3/16 looking for help with Rev
and JADE. He probably tried to send along files he was working on by
mistake. As fun as it would be to uncover, there's no conspiracy here.
I think this all runs full circle to some comments I made on another
thread about DMGs for Mac distribution.
We find ourselves talking about alien conspiracies only because we
know what is normal on this List. A newbie could have easily opened
the email and it's attachment, as they'd open any
On 19.03.10 at 15:35 +0800 Kay C Lan apparently wrote:
DMGs (and the Mac Installer) are the standard way Macs distribute
software. Yes you could try some other methods, and that might be
easier for newbies, but those in the know will be thinking, not
normal, therefore alien conspiracy;-)
On 19/03/2010 13:27, Robert Brenstein wrote:
On 19.03.10 at 15:35 +0800 Kay C Lan apparently wrote:
DMGs (and the Mac Installer) are the standard way Macs distribute
software. Yes you could try some other methods, and that might be
easier for newbies, but those in the know will be thinking,
Look, what really creeped me out was
1. The messages had 4 ATTACHMENTS. That is not allowed here. Suddenly the
message appears with them.
2. There were no normal headers indicating WHERE the email came from.
3. The name was unknown to me and it appeared as PERSONAL message to me.
Scott, I think
That's common knowledge. What perhaps you didn't know is that they are THEM!
You didn't hear that from me.
Bob
On Mar 18, 2010, at 10:38 PM, Scott Rossi wrote:
Now world governments covering up the existence of of extra terrestrial
life, THAT'S a conspiracy I can get behind...
Jacque-
Thursday, March 18, 2010, 11:03:01 PM, you wrote:
I feel so neglected. I didn't get a copy. :( But just for the record,
this person wrote to the tech queue, is a user who is investigating Rev
for possible purchase, and asked about JADE communications. I told him I
wasn't familiar
Scott Rossi wrote:
Dudes, come on. The guy wrote the list on 3/16 looking for help with Rev
and JADE.
I searched for zeeshan in the archives and came up empty. How did you
find that post?
He probably tried to send along files he was working on by
mistake.
I'm curious how that
Mark Wieder wrote:
Let me point out again that the message did *not* go to this list.
Looking at the email headers, it appears that I received it via bcc.
It's possible that the listserv software couldn't handle that and
bounced it to everyone, but that wouldn't explain why you *didn't* get
a
Richard Gaskin wrote:
Don't you see it?!?!?! Connect the dots!!! ObjectiveC is people!! It's
a cook book!!!
Yes, the monsters are due on Maple Street
In that case we just send them out to the corn field. Problem solved.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay |
/me fetches tin foil hat
oh noes!
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Possible-virus-warning-tp1598918p1599827.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution
Andrew Kluthe wrote:
/me fetches tin foil hat
oh noes!
Be careful: researchers at MIT performed a study on the effectiveness
of tin foil hats, and concluded that they may be part of the conspiracy:
On the Effectiveness of Aluminium Foil Helmets:
An Empirical Study
Richard-
Friday, March 19, 2010, 11:44:34 AM, you wrote:
On the Effectiveness of Aluminium Foil Helmets:
An Empirical Study
http://people.csail.mit.edu/rahimi/helmet/
Thanks - I saw that on boingboing a while back and had completely
forgotten about it g
--
-Mark Wieder
On 19/03/2010 21:38, Mark Wieder wrote:
Richard-
Friday, March 19, 2010, 11:44:34 AM, you wrote:
On the Effectiveness of Aluminium Foil Helmets:
An Empirical Study
http://people.csail.mit.edu/rahimi/helmet/
Thanks - I saw that on boingboing a while back and had completely
forgotten about
On 19/03/2010 18:41, Richard Gaskin wrote:
snip
Scott, I think you underestimate the scope of the RevMobile technology
and its implications for interstellar migration.
Some people seem to know all about that already:
http://www.himalayanacademy.com/resources/books/ls/
snip
Aye, but no one to date has found an efficient way to put an old PC on one's
head and have it stay there for long. Every solution has it's limitations.
Bob
On Mar 19, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Richmond Mathewson wrote:
As Linux costs nothing and one can get hold of a second-hand PC for next to
On 19/03/2010 22:07, Bob Sneidar wrote:
Aye, but no one to date has found an efficient way to put an old PC on one's
head and have it stay there for long. Every solution has it's limitations.
At least one chap has tried it:
I just had a look at:
http://www.nabble.com/-td2294.html#a2297
the nabble version of the list.
That looks very unusual
regards
Bernd
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Possible-virus-warning-tp1598918p1610395.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive
Actually I was entering
http://www.nabble.com/Revolution---User-f2297.html
and it was automatically changed to
http://www.nabble.com/-td2294.html#a2297
something fishy is going on
regards
Bernd
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Possible-virus-warning-tp1598918p1611247.html
Bernd-
Try
http://old.nabble.com/Revolution---User-f2297.html
--
-Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
On 19/03/2010 23:04, BNig wrote:
Actually I was entering
http://www.nabble.com/Revolution---User-f2297.html
and it was automatically changed to
http://www.nabble.com/-td2294.html#a2297
something fishy is going on
regards
Bernd
Russian mafia?
Something about technology and Ingushetia . . . ?
Mark Wieder wrote:
Bernd-
Try
http://old.nabble.com/Revolution---User-f2297.html
--
-Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
that works, thank you
still something is going on...
regards
Bernd
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Possible-virus-warning
?
Something about technology and Ingushetia . . . ?
maybe they like the name of our favorite xTalk tool ;-)
regards
Bernd
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Possible-virus-warning-tp1598918p1616810.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
/-td2294.html#a2297
something fishy is going on
regards
Bernd
Russian mafia?
Something about technology and Ingushetia . . . ?
maybe they like the name of our favorite xTalk tool ;-)
regards
Bernd
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Possible-virus-warning
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 8:05 AM, zeeshan aamir shani.run...@gmail.com wrote:
Hay to all,
This is not Virus, any way if you think that this is Virus then its your
choice dont open.
But any how this is not Virus.
I am beginner or Rev and want cummunicate REV and JADE through Socket
thanks sara
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Sarah Reichelt
sarah.reich...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 8:05 AM, zeeshan aamir shani.run...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hay to all,
This is not Virus, any way if you think that this is Virus then its your
choice dont open.
But any how
Just got the following email sent directly to me:
From: zeeshan aamir shani.run...@gmail.com
Subject:Communication between JADE (NetBeans) and Runrev
Date: March 18, 2010 9:57:58 PM CDT
To: shani.run...@gmail.com
Has a nice attachment, which I
Jeffrey-
It passed my antivirus software's check, but I'm not foolish enough to
open an unrequested binary attachment...
--
-Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to
Google didn't choke on this guy and they appear to be binary... images..
sqb
On 18 March 2010 22:21, Mark Wieder mwie...@ahsoftware.net wrote:
Jeffrey-
It passed my antivirus software's check, but I'm not foolish enough to
open an unrequested binary attachment...
--
-Mark Wieder
stephen-
Thursday, March 18, 2010, 8:57:56 PM, you wrote:
Google didn't choke on this guy and they appear to be binary... images..
Most of them. Then there's the Test.rar archive...
--
-Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
___
use-revolution
stephen barncard wrote:
Google didn't choke on this guy and they appear to be binary... images..
I moved the attachment over to a machine I keep quarantined for such
explorations, and un-rarred it. In addition to the images there are
also some very small Java source files and a Rev
Right. Definitely not right - the only way that could get to me is that the
server got hijacked or out email address.
Deleted. This guy isn't real.
sqb
On 18 March 2010 23:08, Mark Wieder mwie...@ahsoftware.net wrote:
stephen-
Thursday, March 18, 2010, 8:57:56 PM, you wrote:
Google
Richard-
Thursday, March 18, 2010, 9:15:06 PM, you wrote:
Whether the email is part of the culprit's work or just another victim
like all of us who shouldn't have rec'd that unsolicited email remains
to be seen.
Here's my best-case scenario: the rev team was attempting to reinstate
private
Mark Wieder wrote:
Richard-
Thursday, March 18, 2010, 9:15:06 PM, you wrote:
Whether the email is part of the culprit's work or just another victim
like all of us who shouldn't have rec'd that unsolicited email remains
to be seen.
Here's my best-case scenario: the rev team was attempting
Whatever. It creeped me out nonetheless.
On 18 March 2010 23:45, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com wrote:
Mark Wieder wrote:
Richard-
Thursday, March 18, 2010, 9:15:06 PM, you wrote:
Whether the email is part of the culprit's work or just another victim
like all of us who
Recently, stephen barncard wrote:
Whatever. It creeped me out nonetheless.
Dudes, come on. The guy wrote the list on 3/16 looking for help with Rev
and JADE. He probably tried to send along files he was working on by
mistake. As fun as it would be to uncover, there's no conspiracy here.
Now
Scott-
Thursday, March 18, 2010, 10:38:13 PM, you wrote:
Dudes, come on. The guy wrote the list on 3/16 looking for help with Rev
and JADE. He probably tried to send along files he was working on by
mistake. As fun as it would be to uncover, there's no conspiracy here.
The message did
38 matches
Mail list logo
