Re: Using Revolution only in a command line mode?

2006-05-15 Thread Dar Scott
On May 13, 2006, at 9:57 AM, Glen Bojsza wrote: I was wondering if anybody has used Revolution in a non-Gui environment. I am finding several cases where telecom vendors don't support a windowing system on their linux products, only the command line. I believe that Metacard use to be able

Using Revolution only in a command line mode?

2006-05-13 Thread Glen Bojsza
Hello everyone, I was wondering if anybody has used Revolution in a non-Gui enviroment. I am finding several cases where telecom vendors don't support a windowing system on their linux products, only the command line. I believe that Metacard use to be able to run in this type of enviroment and

Re: Using Revolution only in a command line mode?

2006-05-13 Thread Stephen Barncard
I was wondering if anybody has used Revolution in a non-Gui enviroment. I I can't see why not. I haven't done it exactly in an app, but I use command-mode every day in the message box to test code snippets commands and functions. Your entire command line project could be a field on a card

Re: Using Revolution only in a command line mode?

2006-05-13 Thread Mark Schonewille
Hi Glen, I am working on a command line utility for Revolution. In fact, Metacard used to be a fully functional command line utility in itself, but this wonderful feature is definitely broken with the new file format. Additionally, it is no longer possible to run stacks the same way you

Re: Using Revolution only in a command line mode?

2006-05-13 Thread Richard Gaskin
Mark Schonewille wrote: In fact, Metacard used to be a fully functional command line utility in itself, but this wonderful feature is definitely broken with the new file format. What specifically changed in the file format that prevents faceless use? What are the symptoms? Additionally, it

Re: Using Revolution only in a command line mode?

2006-05-13 Thread Mark Schonewille
I didn't say that one can no longer use Revolution as a faceless application, Richard. Rev stacks used to be shell scripts in themselves, which is no longer the case as of Rev 2.7.0. This has nothing to do with the CGI engine, though. For CGI, I recommend the non-cgi Linux 2.0 engine. The

Re: Using Revolution only in a command line mode?

2006-05-13 Thread Richard Gaskin
Mark Schonewille wrote: I didn't say that one can no longer use Revolution as a faceless application, Richard. Rev stacks used to be shell scripts in themselves, which is no longer the case as of Rev 2.7.0. I must be slow on the uptake today, so bear with me, but AKAIK stack files were

Re: Using Revolution only in a command line mode?

2006-05-13 Thread Mark Schonewille
Hi Richard, When you look at the beginning of a MetaCard file, you see a few shell commands. Actually, a path, 3 comments and a shell command. It tells the shell to start the MetaCard executable !/bin/sh/mc if you have that installed. This is different in the new stack file format, which

Re: Using Revolution only in a command line mode?

2006-05-13 Thread Richard Gaskin
Mark Schonewille wrote: When you look at the beginning of a MetaCard file, you see a few shell commands. Actually, a path, 3 comments and a shell command. It tells the shell to start the MetaCard executable !/bin/sh/mc if you have that installed. Specifically: #!/bin/sh # MetaCard