On 5/20/07 5:35 AM, David Bovill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone got extensive experience of using altID? I am thinking of using
it - but not sure exactly how.
The scenario I have is to do with a library of components that get copied
all over the place, replace each other and need a
On 26/05/07, Dick Kriesel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Watch out also for the upper limit on altIDs, which is 65535.
Didn't know that - will do!
Does that work for you?
I don't think it does. I like the idea of being able to copy a template
into a stack and still refer to the object by its
Hi friends,
I have no experience in opening HC stacks in Rev and actually don't
have to :-)
But a friend of mine tried it and got this error: File is not a stack!
Any hints? Thanks in advance.
Regards
Klaus Major
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.major-k.de
Hi there,
Hi friends,
I have no experience in opening HC stacks in Rev and actually don't
have to :-)
But a friend of mine tried it and got this error: File is not a
stack!
Any hints? Thanks in advance.
We already found the answer!
It was just the Open dialog that only lets you open
On 5/26/07 3:51 AM, David Bovill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the idea of being able to copy a template
into a stack and still refer to the object by its altID - so everything
keeps working. The aim is not to have to rename anything in a script as this
gets messy in a general case.
But
Dick,
I admire in cleverness of all this, but the code is even worse to
comprehend than assembly language. Seems to me we're going backwards.
Can't we just keep things simple; like with put and get and
meaningful names?
Seems to me we're defeating the whole purpose of Rev.
Just MHO,
True, but IDs are global, and faster as a lookup is not required.
Dick,
I admire in cleverness of all this, but the code is even worse to
comprehend than assembly language. Seems to me we're going
backwards. Can't we just keep things simple; like with put and get
and meaningful names?
On 5/26/07 11:55 AM, Joe Lewis Wilkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I admire in cleverness of all this, but the code is even worse to
comprehend than assembly language. Seems to me we're going backwards.
Can't we just keep things simple; like with put and get and
meaningful names?
Seems to me
On 26/05/07, Dick Kriesel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then each template knows its copies, each copy knows its template, and
each
target knows which copies of which templates it contains. Your code can
refer to a control in any of the copies using an of group id clause to
disambiguate the altIDs.
And assembly language beats the socks off of everything, and I
suppose, with Apple's transition to Intel chips, would also be cross
platform. Of course I've never done any for X86 chips; but a lot for
6800; and, even with the 8 and 16 mhz machines of the day, it was
blazing, eye-popping
On the topic of names of things - I have developed a technique for creating
names that are as mobile as possible - the best form seems to be as follows:
button Test of stack Mobile
Seems simple? I wish it was easier to create these names in Rev or am I
missing something - the long names give
On 5/26/07 12:16 PM, David Bovill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the problem is you cannot use control id tAltID of group id -
thats why it does not work
That construct works for me. Here's a working example, derived from the
first script I posted yesterday.
on mouseUp
create stack
go to it
Though I've rarely used altIDs, when I did some testing on this a while
back I found that they could be used in just about any syntax in which
the ID could be used, e.g.:
get the loc of btn id tMyAltID of grp id tMyTrueID
IIRC from those tests, the engine does the lookup in object order,
It seems with the upgrade to CS3, as some are saying over at the Adobe
forums,
we have paid for a downgrade
Specifically, Adobe dropped ImageReady and it is no longer possible to
create and share droplets for photo processing. Sure you can buy
Fireworks and learn it's powerful batch processing
Hi all,
Could you help find out if I'm going insane or not... On a Windows
standalone as soon as I call 'qtInitialize' to start Trevor's
external the standalone crashes with the standard Windows 'do you
want to send a message' dialog.
Here's the test stack:
Hi Ian,
I had a similar problem. Probably, the best thing you can do is to
write Trevor privately and hope he will find the time to solve the
problem.
Best,
Mark
--
Economy-x-Talk
Consultancy and Software Engineering
http://economy-x-talk.com
http://www.salery.biz
Get your store
On 26 May 2007, at 21:42, Mark Schonewille wrote:
I had a similar problem. Probably, the best thing you can do is to
write Trevor privately and hope he will find the time to solve the
problem.
Thanks, I just wanted to see if it was something specific to me
before contacting Trevor
ImageMagick
http://www.imagemagick.org/script/index.php
It would be nice to have a direct interface from Rev. However it is also
possible to use in batch mode and command line, accessible from many other
programing languages and environments (Perl, Python, etc...).
All the best!
Viktoras
I was wondering how others deal with versionioning their stacks. I don't mean
the standalones which already have version information but regular stacks.
I have a stack that is opened by a standalone stub. The standalone won't change
much but the program stack that is opened will. I want to be
On 5/27/07, Bill Vlahos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering how others deal with versionioning their stacks. I don't mean
the standalones which already have version information but regular stacks.
I have a stack that is opened by a standalone stub. The standalone won't change
much but
Bill,
I use Magic Carpet by Altuit http://www.altuit.com/webs/altuit2/
MagicCarpetCover/default.htm, this allows me to work in groups and
maintain previous versions in sane places. Also I usually have a
hidden field called vers in the stack that shows the version info
if opened in the
Bill, in my HC days, I made it a point to have a copyright field/
announcement on the first card of every stack that I released to
others; that, when clicked on, provided an answer dialog with all
of my version info. Of course I wasn't distributing my stacks over
a very broad user base, and
Bill Vlahos wrote:
I was wondering how others deal with versionioning their stacks.
I don't mean the standalones which already have version information
but regular stacks.
The ECMI spec at the Rev Interoperability Project (RIP) has addressed this:
Bill,
You already have MagicCarpet, so you can use our system if you like.
Contact me offlist and I'll help.
best,
Chipp
On 5/26/07, Bill Vlahos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering how others deal with versionioning their stacks. I don't mean
the standalones which already have version
Say, I'm writing an app for a company that prints shipping paperwork on a
24-pin OKI Microline 590 24-pin printer.? I've started off by getting my hands
on some working Excel spreadsheets that print to the printer, with the correct
character positioning and spacing to fix exactly in the right
I use Magic Carpet too and it is great.
However, this is something I want to make available to my users.
Bill
On Saturday, May 26, 2007, at 05:55PM, Andre Garzia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill,
I use Magic Carpet by Altuit http://www.altuit.com/webs/altuit2/
MagicCarpetCover/default.htm, this
Richard,
That's great.
I don't seem to be able to see any files. Do I need to be a member to get at it
(I really hate Yahoo Groups).
Bill
On Saturday, May 26, 2007, at 06:32PM, Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Bill Vlahos wrote:
I was wondering how others deal with versionioning
This is really good - and really quite easy to do basic stuff with
shell calls.
Thanks for posting it.
Best,
Mark
On 26 May 2007, at 23:32, Viktoras Didziulis wrote:
ImageMagick
http://www.imagemagick.org/script/index.php
It would be nice to have a direct interface from Rev. However it is
28 matches
Mail list logo
