Andre,
Do you already have a some kind of demo stack from which I (and other
interested persons on this list) can take a look at and learn from it?
Just to get me started, if it is to confidential to share with the
world, please contact me off-list, I'm really interested in what you
did...
Hi,
Has anyone experience with using Windows Webservices from within
Revolution applications and interacting with them?
If not directly, maybe via altBrowser?
Before I start testing en getting specs from the developers of these
Webservices, it would be nice to know if I can use them...
Hi,
I had the same problem.
I search in internet, and everything I found was an unofficial stack
(it seems old...) to use soap.
So I reached this conclusion: I use RunRev power to manage xml (not
soap), then I create a jsp page (or javabean) in a Java server which
will act as a service broker. So
Hi There folks,
welcome to the Revolution. As a matter of fact Rev can do
webservices, any webservices you want as long as you can code. It's
not as simply as some languages where you drop a WSDL file and all
the methods are added. There are libraries for SOAP and XML-RPC. The
SOAP
Sorry Andre, you agree, RunRev can manage xml.
But as you know, soap is not easy to be coded, even if you have
powerful xml tools.
But since soap is becoming much famous, I think Runtime Revolution
company should provide a tested library (a lot of client and server
programming languages already
On Nov 18, 2005, at 7:59 PM, Alessandro Manotti wrote:
Sorry Andre, you agree, RunRev can manage xml.
But as you know, soap is not easy to be coded, even if you have
powerful xml tools.
But since soap is becoming much famous, I think Runtime Revolution
company should provide a tested library
Doesn't the built-in xmlrpc stuff in Rev work quite well? Or does it
just need a better abstraction layer to make it more usable?
On Nov 18, 2005, at 4:12 PM, Andre Garzia wrote:
and yes, libraries should be supplied.
~~
Dan Shafer, Information
Dan,
the xml-rpc works fine, anything more we need, it's easy to code on
top. There's no SOAP though, and no server side libraries, but third
parties can provide that in the future.
Cheers
andre
On Nov 18, 2005, at 10:54 PM, Dan Shafer wrote:
Doesn't the built-in xmlrpc stuff in Rev work
Andre
Is your XMLRPC demo site offline now? I dug up an old email where you
talked about the demos you did at port 8082 (I think) on your server
but that's non-responsive.
Dan
On Nov 18, 2005, at 5:03 PM, Andre Garzia wrote:
Dan,
the xml-rpc works fine, anything more we need, it's
On Nov 18, 2005, at 4:54 PM, Dan Shafer wrote:
Doesn't the built-in xmlrpc stuff in Rev work quite well? Or does
it just need a better abstraction layer to make it more usable?
The current library needs some improvements. The library could use:
* Support for adding an Transcript arrays to
On Nov 18, 2005, at 11:13 PM, Dan Shafer wrote:
Andre
Is your XMLRPC demo site offline now? I dug up an old email where
you talked about the demos you did at port 8082 (I think) on your
server but that's non-responsive.
Dan
Dan,
my site is a little dead!!! :D
I am putting a new
Andre-
I have to say the documentation on the xmlrpc functions leaves
something to be desired. For example, the description of the following
functions simply says More details to come:
revXMLRPC_DeleteParam
revXMLRPC_Execute
revXMLRPC_Free
revXMLRPC_Free (apparently it's an alias for itself)
12 matches
Mail list logo
