Many thanks Roger.
It's not exactly what I was looking for but, as the actress said to the
bishop, every little bit helps ;-)
Not a stack, but I have found this website keeps the list up-to-date
in (almost) real-time. I also like it because it includes threaded
browsing. You still have to do
On 6/14/05, Mikey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I really like using gmail for handling mailing lists.
I've also been using gmail for this list. I have all the messages go
to my personal account but are redirected to my gmail account and I
view them there.
It's the best tool I've found for reading
I really like using gmail for handling mailing lists.
1) I have my own personal searchable archive of messages from the
list, searchable with google's tools, and organized the way I want.
The way that gmail handles messages encourages you to keep everything
for easy review later.
2) I love the w
Nicolas-
Monday, June 13, 2005, 10:08:44 PM, you wrote:
NC> Downloaded it, and now everything's working as it should.
NC> Thanks again, Mark.
Thanks for pointing out the problem. I just assumed that the upload
went properly in the first place.
By the way...
put url(pUrl) doesn't work if pUrl
Kat-
Monday, June 13, 2005, 7:41:28 PM, you wrote:
K> I think I just spotted what could be the problem with the version I got
K> from your website. 1.63 has a space in the filename -- "Archive
K> Search.rev" -- while the one linked from your webpage does not have one.
Ah, the joys of RevOnline
Hello Mark,
The stack came down nicely on Windows XP as well. A few comments though.
The fonts you have chosen put a strain on my eyes (being more than
sixtyish), so I immediately changed the fld "Message text" to Verdana,
plain, 12 and the field "thread" to Verdana, plain, 11. I also would
li
MW > Try it now. I was having quite a bit of trouble with RevOnline
MW > uploading (and still am). I thought I had fixed that and put it online
MW > but apparently it never took. Version 1.63 is up there now
Downloaded it, and now everything's working as it should.
Thanks a
Mark Wieder wrote:
Kat-
Monday, June 13, 2005, 5:26:39 PM, you wrote:
K> I just downloaded the stack (again), and it's still version 1.62 which
??? I just checked it again, downloading both from my web site and
from RevOnline, and they're both coming in at 1.63 ???
I think I just spotted
Mark Wieder wrote:
Kat-
Monday, June 13, 2005, 5:26:39 PM, you wrote:
K> I just downloaded the stack (again), and it's still version 1.62 which
??? I just checked it again, downloading both from my web site and
from RevOnline, and they're both coming in at 1.63 ???
I tried it again after
Kat-
Monday, June 13, 2005, 5:26:39 PM, you wrote:
K> I just downloaded the stack (again), and it's still version 1.62 which
??? I just checked it again, downloading both from my web site and
from RevOnline, and they're both coming in at 1.63 ???
--
-Mark Wieder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Mark Wieder wrote:
[snipped ]
NC> Problem though!! On Win2K + Rev2.5, the ArchiveSearch
NC> stack works fine except it doesn't display a message's
NC> contents when you click on its subject line, i.e., a search
Well, that makes it pretty useless...
Try it now. I was having quite a bit of trou
Nicolas-
Sunday, June 12, 2005, 11:02:10 PM, you wrote:
NC> Thank you for that stack. (Some day, I'm going to enjoy
NC> taking it apart and see how it works :-)
Have fun. It relies pretty heavily on Google (and Pipermail) not
changing their page layout. There are two levels of screen scraping:
t
Mark Wieder offered:
> Well, for searching the archives online you can always use
> http://www.ahsoftware.net/ArchiveSearch.html , but for browsing it's
> hard to beat gmane.
Thank you for that stack. (Some day, I'm going to enjoy
taking it apart and see how it works :-)
Problem though!! On Win
>and I was wondering if anybody had developed a stack to read the
>list in a more intelligent manner.
Not a stack, but I have found this website keeps the list up-to-date in
(almost) real-time. I also like it because it includes threaded browsing.
You still have to do your posting and replying t
I continue to be amazed at how much useful information passes
through this list on a daily basis, and the incredible speed that
one gets a response to ones questions (many, many, thanks to all!!),
however even with digests set the time one spends browsing is a lot
and I was wondering if anybody
I know what you mean, Bob. A wealth of experience and information on an
hourly basis. Although I cannot offer you a fast track to digesting the list
digests, I can point you to the Scripter's Scrapbook as a means of organizing
and
storing the information that you glean from them.
/H
Script
Bob-
Friday, June 10, 2005, 9:26:29 AM, you wrote:
BE> I continue to be amazed at how much useful information passes through this
BE> list on a daily basis, and the incredible speed that one gets a response to
BE> ones questions (many, many, thanks to all!!), however even with digests set
BE> the
Recently, Bob Earp wrote:
> I was wondering if anybody had
> developed a stack to read the list in a more intelligent manner.
Not sure if there's a stack, but there's Web interface.
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.ide.revolution.user
Regards,
Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, Mul
I continue to be amazed at how much useful information passes through this
list on a daily basis, and the incredible speed that one gets a response to
ones questions (many, many, thanks to all!!), however even with digests set
the time one spends browsing is a lot and I was wondering if anybody
19 matches
Mail list logo