Re: Is there a better way of scanning this list ?

2005-06-16 Thread Robert J. Earp
Many thanks Roger. It's not exactly what I was looking for but, as the actress said to the bishop, every little bit helps ;-) Not a stack, but I have found this website keeps the list up-to-date in (almost) real-time. I also like it because it includes threaded browsing. You still have to do

Re: Is there a better way of scanning this list ?

2005-06-15 Thread Howard Bornstein
On 6/14/05, Mikey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I really like using gmail for handling mailing lists. I've also been using gmail for this list. I have all the messages go to my personal account but are redirected to my gmail account and I view them there. It's the best tool I've found for reading

Re: Is there a better way of scanning this list ?

2005-06-14 Thread Signe Marie Sanne
Hello Mark, The stack came down nicely on Windows XP as well. A few comments though. The fonts you have chosen put a strain on my eyes (being more than sixtyish), so I immediately changed the fld Message text to Verdana, plain, 12 and the field thread to Verdana, plain, 11. I also would like

Re: Is there a better way of scanning this list ?

2005-06-14 Thread Mark Wieder
Kat- Monday, June 13, 2005, 7:41:28 PM, you wrote: K I think I just spotted what could be the problem with the version I got K from your website. 1.63 has a space in the filename -- Archive K Search.rev -- while the one linked from your webpage does not have one. Ah, the joys of RevOnline.

Re: Is there a better way of scanning this list ?

2005-06-14 Thread Mark Wieder
Nicolas- Monday, June 13, 2005, 10:08:44 PM, you wrote: NC Downloaded it, and now everything's working as it should. NC Thanks again, Mark. Thanks for pointing out the problem. I just assumed that the upload went properly in the first place. By the way... put url(pUrl) doesn't work if pUrl

Re: Is there a better way of scanning this list ?

2005-06-14 Thread Mikey
I really like using gmail for handling mailing lists. 1) I have my own personal searchable archive of messages from the list, searchable with google's tools, and organized the way I want. The way that gmail handles messages encourages you to keep everything for easy review later. 2) I love the

Re: Is there a better way of scanning this list ?

2005-06-13 Thread Nicolas Cueto
Mark Wieder offered: Well, for searching the archives online you can always use http://www.ahsoftware.net/ArchiveSearch.html , but for browsing it's hard to beat gmane. Thank you for that stack. (Some day, I'm going to enjoy taking it apart and see how it works :-) Problem though!! On Win2K

Re: Is there a better way of scanning this list ?

2005-06-13 Thread Mark Wieder
Nicolas- Sunday, June 12, 2005, 11:02:10 PM, you wrote: NC Thank you for that stack. (Some day, I'm going to enjoy NC taking it apart and see how it works :-) Have fun. It relies pretty heavily on Google (and Pipermail) not changing their page layout. There are two levels of screen scraping:

Re: Is there a better way of scanning this list ?

2005-06-13 Thread Kat
Mark Wieder wrote: [snipped ] NC Problem though!! On Win2K + Rev2.5, the ArchiveSearch NC stack works fine except it doesn't display a message's NC contents when you click on its subject line, i.e., a search Well, that makes it pretty useless... Try it now. I was having quite a bit of

Re: Is there a better way of scanning this list ?

2005-06-13 Thread Mark Wieder
Kat- Monday, June 13, 2005, 5:26:39 PM, you wrote: K I just downloaded the stack (again), and it's still version 1.62 which ??? I just checked it again, downloading both from my web site and from RevOnline, and they're both coming in at 1.63 ??? -- -Mark Wieder [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Is there a better way of scanning this list ?

2005-06-13 Thread Kat
Mark Wieder wrote: Kat- Monday, June 13, 2005, 5:26:39 PM, you wrote: K I just downloaded the stack (again), and it's still version 1.62 which ??? I just checked it again, downloading both from my web site and from RevOnline, and they're both coming in at 1.63 ??? I tried it again after

Re: Is there a better way of scanning this list ?

2005-06-13 Thread Kat
Mark Wieder wrote: Kat- Monday, June 13, 2005, 5:26:39 PM, you wrote: K I just downloaded the stack (again), and it's still version 1.62 which ??? I just checked it again, downloading both from my web site and from RevOnline, and they're both coming in at 1.63 ??? I think I just spotted

Re: Is there a better way of scanning this list ?

2005-06-13 Thread Nicolas Cueto
MW Try it now. I was having quite a bit of trouble with RevOnline MW uploading (and still am). I thought I had fixed that and put it online MW but apparently it never took. Version 1.63 is up there now Downloaded it, and now everything's working as it should. Thanks

Re: Is there a better way of scanning this list ?

2005-06-11 Thread Roger . E . Eller
and I was wondering if anybody had developed a stack to read the list in a more intelligent manner. Not a stack, but I have found this website keeps the list up-to-date in (almost) real-time. I also like it because it includes threaded browsing. You still have to do your posting and replying to

Is there a better way of scanning this list ?

2005-06-10 Thread Bob Earp
I continue to be amazed at how much useful information passes through this list on a daily basis, and the incredible speed that one gets a response to ones questions (many, many, thanks to all!!), however even with digests set the time one spends browsing is a lot and I was wondering if anybody

Re: Is there a better way of scanning this list ?

2005-06-10 Thread Scott Rossi
Recently, Bob Earp wrote: I was wondering if anybody had developed a stack to read the list in a more intelligent manner. Not sure if there's a stack, but there's Web interface. http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.ide.revolution.user Regards, Scott Rossi Creative Director Tactile Media,

Re: Is there a better way of scanning this list ?

2005-06-10 Thread Mark Wieder
Bob- Friday, June 10, 2005, 9:26:29 AM, you wrote: BE I continue to be amazed at how much useful information passes through this BE list on a daily basis, and the incredible speed that one gets a response to BE ones questions (many, many, thanks to all!!), however even with digests set BE the

Re: Is there a better way of scanning this list ?

2005-06-10 Thread FlexibleLearning
I know what you mean, Bob. A wealth of experience and information on an hourly basis. Although I cannot offer you a fast track to digesting the list digests, I can point you to the Scripter's Scrapbook as a means of organizing and storing the information that you glean from them. /H

Re: Is there a better way of scanning this list ?

2005-06-10 Thread Robert Brenstein
I continue to be amazed at how much useful information passes through this list on a daily basis, and the incredible speed that one gets a response to ones questions (many, many, thanks to all!!), however even with digests set the time one spends browsing is a lot and I was wondering if