Yes, Cubist pointed this out too, and I've been mulling it over, and
of course you're right. There's a logical this group, field, etc.,
when one is selected, clicked . . . But fleeting states aren't a good
lexical basis for programming languages . . . Dynamic is good, but.
Charles
On Aug
On Aug 7, 2005, at 8:06 AM, Charles Hartman wrote:
There's a logical this group, field, etc., when one is selected,
clicked . . .
So this makes sense in any piece of code that is in, or was called
by a handler.
V.
___
use-revolution
At 11:20 AM -0400 8/5/2005, Charles Hartman wrote:
Well, I don't know. Now that it's pointed out to me, I see in the
Doc under 'this' only mentions of 'this card' and 'this stack' . . .
It seems a little counterintuitive, though, doesn't it? to have an
apparent plain English command with what
In a mouseUp handler for a radio-button group called my group, I
would have thought I could refer to the hilitedButtonName of the
group without specifying it any further. But
answer the hilitedButtonName
doesn't give the right response. Neither does
answer the hilitedButtonName of
Hi Charles,
Me is often opposed to the target: me is equivalent to the object
that contains the currently running handler and the target refers to
the object which received the message that started execution.
Note that target without the refers to the contents of a control.
When you use
What I most don't understand (??) is the relation between me and
this X when me is an instance of type X.
Charles
Charles
me is used when an object queries it's own properties or objects.
for example if i clicked in a field, the field script could ask:
on mouseup
get the hilitedline of
At 10:09 AM -0400 8/5/2005, Charles Hartman wrote:
What I most don't understand (??) is the relation between me and
this X when me is an instance of type X.
This only applies to the current card or current stack (this card
or this stack). This may or may not be the object whose script is
Jeanne
Not just this stack and this card...
Dont forget this group and this background...
X
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jeanne A. E. DeVoto
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 16:48
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: me vs
Hi Xavier,
Could you give an example to explain how you refer to this group: I
agree Jeanne a priori.
And that's what the docs say...
And if I understand well what can mean this card or this
stack (the current stack, the current displayed card), I don't
figure out what would mean this
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jeanne A. E. DeVoto
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 16:48
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: me vs. this?
At 10:09 AM -0400 8/5/2005, Charles Hartman wrote:
What I most don't understand (??) is the relation between me and
this X when me
sez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Now that it's pointed out to me, I see in the Doc
under 'this' only mentions of 'this card' and 'this stack' . . . It
seems a little counterintuitive, though, doesn't it? to have an
apparent plain English command with what feels like an arbitrary
limitation on its
11 matches
Mail list logo
