On Jan 11, 2009, at 5:15 PM, David Bovill wrote:
I have this old command - and just found that it is not accurate for
a field
of text with large line numbers. Can anyone make it more accurate?
on field_ScrollToLine lineNum, fieldObject
-- does not seem accurate for large line numbers
Thanks - I'll select the line!
2009/1/12 Devin Asay devin_a...@byu.edu
On Jan 11, 2009, at 5:15 PM, David Bovill wrote:
I have this old command - and just found that it is not accurate for a
field
of text with large line numbers. Can anyone make it more accurate?
on field_ScrollToLine
I have this old command - and just found that it is not accurate for a field
of text with large line numbers. Can anyone make it more accurate?
on field_ScrollToLine lineNum, fieldObject
-- does not seem accurate for large line numbers (it's an underestimate)
???
if lineNum = 0 then
I've modified Xavier's modification of my modification of
(somebody's??) code to search incrementally in a sorted list field.
(This version, unlike Xavier's, assumes the whole line in the field
is the sorted item.)
But it doesn't solve one problem: suppose the user starts typing a
string
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: scrolling to a line
I've modified Xavier's modification of my modification of
(somebody's??) code to search incrementally in a sorted list field.
(This version, unlike Xavier's, assumes the whole line in the
field is the sorted item.)
But it doesn't
0, so no scroll at all.
;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Charles Hartman
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 17:08
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: scrolling to a line
I've modified Xavier's modification of my modification
set the hilitedline of me to lo (0 works ok! ;)
I don't think so, unless I'm being even denser than usual. If
there's no match at all, 'lo' will contain 0, so no scroll at all.
I meant it unselects anything if you click in an empty line ;)
can be handled how you want...
for example if
Charles Hartman wrote:
I've modified Xavier's modification of my modification of
(somebody's??) code to search incrementally in a sorted list field.
Could it have been the one I posted about two years ago? I sent this to
the list:
local lUserKeys, lOldTicks
on keyDown whichKey -- select
?
cheers
Xavier
http://monsieurx.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
J. Landman Gay
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 20:00
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: scrolling to a line
Charles Hartman wrote:
I've modified Xavier's
FWIW, I don't think that's expected behavior or necessarily good user
experience design. If there's no find then things should stay the
same. Maybe a beep but a scroll to a phantom location doesn't really
help me much, doesn't give me any new information.
My $0.02.
On Nov 13, 2005, at
On Nov 13, 2005, at 3:04 PM, Dan Shafer wrote:
FWIW, I don't think that's expected behavior or necessarily good
user experience design. If there's no find then things should
stay the same. Maybe a beep but a scroll to a phantom location
doesn't really help me much, doesn't give me any new
I finally figured out where I got the original code which I quoted in
my message
http://lists.runrev.com/pipermail/use-revolution/2005-November/
069934.html
-- it was written by Klaus and posted on Ken's SoT site:
http://www.sonsothunder.com/devres/revolution/tips/fld003.htm
On Nov
J. Landman Gay wrote:
Charles Hartman wrote:
I've modified Xavier's modification of my modification of
(somebody's??) code to search incrementally in a sorted list field.
Could it have been the one I posted about two years ago? I sent this to
the list:
local lUserKeys, lOldTicks
on
13 matches
Mail list logo
