fail if Java Earler Access (ea) build job fails
Raymond Auge (13):
- d4e36e8 add dependabot
- 825b1d1 add bnd-run-maven-plugin plugin
- 597168b update gogo dependency
- ee74c89 [ARIES-2026] Update/unify integrations into the main build
- 2f40ceb update jdks tested via github actions
The Aries team is pleased to announce the release of Aries Spi-Fly version
1.3.2
This version fixes a packaging bug with the OSGi metadata.
This release is available from https://downloads.apache.org/aries/ and
Maven:
org.apache.aries.spifly
org.apache.aries.spifly.XXX
1.3.2
Hey all,
Bad news. Apparently the tests we have for spi-fly are not sufficient to
catch issues with some tricky aspects of OSGi metadata (even if you run it
through a resolver it's not enough) and so we got hit by
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6337 which breaks the
The Aries team is pleased to announce the release of Aries Spi-Fly version
1.3.1
This version fixes a few bugs as well as adding support for Java 16 by
updating to ASM 9.
This release is available from https://downloads.apache.org/aries/ and
Maven:
org.apache.aries.spifly
_NAME + "=" +
> RESTConstants.JAX_RS_NAME + ")")
> @JSONRequired
> @Path("/services")
> public class RESTResource {
> ...
> }
>
> I already tried to use configurations for the application component, but
> did not succeed.
>
>
> Am F
Hey Oliver,
Could you send a PR to Aries JAXRS whiteboard project? We'd love to add
this as a module in the integration group.
- Ray
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 7:47 AM Oliver Schweitzer
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes, I got it to work - this class
>
>
>
The SPi-Fly never consumes OSGi services on the SPI consumer side of the
equation.
It only makes OSGi services available from the provider side for non-SPI
consumers (like DS, OSGiCDI, Blueprint, and so on.)
- Ray
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:56 AM Cyrille Duret wrote:
> OK I will stick with
get the effect you want, a failure or success with a value.
- Ray
>
> Can't have everything I guess.
>
> Ben
>
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2019, 2:58 pm Raymond Auge,
> wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure if Aries Async uses the Promise API in a substitutable way,
>> but the latest vers
I'm not sure if Aries Async uses the Promise API in a substitutable way,
but the latest version of the Promise API has timeout methods [1].
Perhaps Tim Ward could shed some light on this?
One option is simply to try to use the lastest Promise API along with Aries
Async.
Sincerely,
- Ray
[1]
I'm not sure if it's the case in Karaf, but isn't the "bundle cache" where
Configuration Admin configurations are stored? I wouldn't delete the bundle
cache unless you are prepared to recreate all the configurations that would
be deleted each time.
Note that the "bundle cache" is also a
The Apache Aries project is happy to announce the release of SpiFly 1.2
which is significant in that:
- it supports the two main ServiceLoader.load methods, (used to only
support load(Class)
- no external dependencies are needed when deploying the OSGi bundles,
bundles are standalone making
I think what is missing is some actor to load the configuration from
properties file. Normally that's something like Felix Fileinstall, or
perhaps more recently Felix Configurator.
- Ray
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 9:37 AM "Jörn Schumann (
joern.schum...@hs-furtwangen.de)" wrote:
> Config Admin is
dynamically generated
> and the generator does not know in advance which bundle should provides the
> icon so it just generated something like "http://mysite.com/icons/car.png
> ".
>
> Thai
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 10:05 AM, Raymond Auge
> wrote:
&
You don't need any extra bundles to serve static resources because Aries
JAX-RS whiteboard is built using Http Whiteboard which means that all you
need to serve your static resources is to place them in a bundle with the
following component:
@Component(
property= {
Nhut, could you provide a link to a sample repo that we could use to debug?
- Ray
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 9:44 AM, Nhut Thai Le wrote:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> As you can see from previous email, when listing the service provided by
> the bundle, I can see my filter listed with component.id=0, I also
The Aries team is happy to announce the release of SpiFly 1.0.14.
The major feature of this release is the addition of a Framework Extension
[1] bundle which, due to enhancements in R7 framework that allow for
dynamic installation and resolution of system bundle fragments, solves the
start
Carlos and I discussed this a long time ago. It's something I would like to
support. But we didn't make any progress on it and I'm not aware of any
other efforts to do it.
I'd love to see something like this, but honestly my preference would for
OpenAPI rather than Swagger.
- Ray
On Thu, Aug
rs it may be best to keep that code in Aries. We'll see.
> In any case we'll need better documentation and sample projects.
>
For certain!
Sincerely,
- Ray
>
> Toni
>
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 3:19 AM, Raymond Auge
> wrote:
>
>> The goal was simply to reduce t
The goal was simply to reduce the number of moving parts for the first
release to satisfy the RI requirements.
Now that it's out we can proceed with additional features which weren't
required by the spec, such as a good JSONP & JSONB support.
The steps I'd personally like to see will require
ntainer can use ServiceLoader (or whatever else it wants) and
> you can use OSGi services when in OSGi…
>
> Tim
>
> On 18 May 2018, at 21:41, Raymond Auge <raymond.a...@liferay.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 10:52 AM, David Bosschaert <
> david.bossc
ld be possible to enhance SPI Fly so that it
> can act on existing bundles by refreshing them. Would this make sense for
> this use-case?
>
I believe this is the approach I would prefer.
- Ray
>
> Best regards,
>
> David
>
> On 17 May 2018 at 15:53, Raymond Auge <raymond.a..
in others, which is why I
wasn't sure.
Sincerely,
- Ray
>
> cheers
> Pierre
>
> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Raymond Auge <raymond.a...@liferay.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Ok, that's all I needed to hear. I'll file a bug report and try to make a
>> test case.
&g
uld it be possible to file a bug?
>
> Best regards,
>
> David
>
> On 16 May 2018 at 18:38, Raymond Auge <raymond.a...@liferay.com> wrote:
>
>> Is the Service Loader Mediator known to be constrained by start ordering?
>>
>> In other words, I'm finding
Is the Service Loader Mediator known to be constrained by start ordering?
In other words, I'm finding that spifly is having issues when not "started"
before other bundles that specify the requirements and or capabilities on
osgi.serviceloader.
--
*Raymond Augé*
Hello All,
My very shy colleague Carlos has just added a very nice new project in
Aries here [1] called "component-dsl"
It's a functional DSL for OSGi.
- Ray
[1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/aries/trunk/component-dsl/
actually, I have to correct myself because after a little more
consideration, it seems that @ApplicationScoped and @Singleton map quite
literally to osgi's "bundle scope" and "singleton scope" respectively.
- Ray
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Raymond Auge <raymond.
Ray
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> 2016-11-23 18:40 GMT+01:00 Raymond Auge <raymond.a...@liferay.com>:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org>
&g
One more thing, Guillaume, you have much much much more knowledge of CDI
than I. There is no debate there. So let's just put that out there to start
so that no one get's confused about it.
- Ray
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Raymond Auge <raymond.a...@liferay.com>
wrote:
>
>
&
Actually, we have a perfect solution in OSGi for the scenario of
intermittent scopes like web requests, session scope, etc. That is
prototype scope! This is already suggested by the requirements and works
very well with the scoped bean concept. You need a Provider for those beans
and an OSGi
y at eclipsecon 2015 :-)
>
> Christian
>
>
> On 23.11.2016 16:33, Raymond Auge wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> I've been working through implementing RFC-193 [1] and have a relatively
> decent initial cut with most major details already sorted out.
>
> I'm wonderi
, 2016 at 3:42 AM, David Bosschaert <
david.bosscha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ray,
>
> This sounds like a bug to me... Could you please file a JIRA with a small
> test case?
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
> On 12 August 2016 at 19:15, Raymond Auge <raymond
Hey guys,
It would appear that spi-fly is not purely using the osgi wiring's view of
requirements and capabilities as opt-in.
i.e. if I augment at runtime the bundles I want
to enhance with spi-fly with the proper capabilities it doesn't work.
However, if I attach a fragment to the bundle which
immediately, or knows how to deal with the dynamics.
- Ray
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Raymond Auge <raymond.a...@liferay.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Brad Johnson <
> brad.john...@mediadriver.com> wrote:
>
>> Raymond,
>>
&g
omers, we have
transactions, we have AOP, we have tones of proxies, we pretty much have
the entire Java EE stack to support. But I simply will not subject them to
the pain of service damping!
- Ray
Insights are always welcome.
>
> Brad
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:43 AM,
ion knows about. Is
> that really instructions to create a new configuration and populate it with
> data (what a management agent does)?
>
> david jencks
>
> On Jul 7, 2016, at 8:19 AM, Raymond Auge <raymond.a...@liferay.com> wrote:
>
> David, I agree with everything you've sa
ough blueprint
> binds the PID to the first bundle using it
>
>
> best
> Pablo
>
>
> On 07/07/2016 4:41 PM, Raymond Auge wrote:
>
> As long as configurations are not bound to a bundle they can be used by
> any bundle.
>
> The exception clearly shows that the confi
;
> When you say bound to the bundle do you mean that it physically resides in
> the jar/bundle or do you mean bound via the blueprint properties
> persistent-id?
>
> Brad
>
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Raymond Auge <raymond.a...@liferay.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
As long as configurations are not bound to a bundle they can be used by any
bundle.
The exception clearly shows that the configuration is bound to a bundle.
Creating an unbound configuration requires passing a "?" as the second
arguments to getConfiguration/createFactoryConfiguration methods of
e could implement the new spec using Aries RSA.
>
> If you prefer to create a separate project for the spec then I would not
> block this but I think it makes sense to consider simply adding this in
> Aries RSA.
>
> Christian
>
> 2016-05-12 21:32 GMT+02:00 Raymond Auge &l
tional provider for Aries RSA. It should not be difficult to extend
>> your code to make it a RSA provider.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> 2016-05-12 18:09 GMT+02:00 Raymond Auge <raymond.a...@liferay.com>:
>>
>>> Oh, here is a link to the current implem
Hello all,
Some of you may be aware of the R7 work toward a spec for JAX-RS Whitaboard
[1].
There's some interest in developing an RI based on some open source work by
Liferay starting from it's existing JAX-RS whiteboard implementation (which
is already relatively close to the current RFC). The
41 matches
Mail list logo
