Matt, please see the vote thread for datails including tag link. Please do
check the release and vote but if they need to be respun you'll need to
pull in the new artifacts. Since we release by bundle there is no such
thing as Aries 0.4 each bundle is separate.
Cheers,
Jeremy
On 5 Nov 2011
Hi David,
Thank you very much for the reply.
Meanwhile can I download and build it my self? Is there a tagged version
somewhere?
Thanks
Matt
On Nov 4, 2011 7:48 PM, "David Jencks" wrote:
> The aries versioning is now very fragmented. There are a lot of artifacts
> leading up
The aries versioning is now very fragmented. There are a lot of artifacts
leading up to blueprint 0.4 currently under vote. Assuming no problems are
found I'd expect the vote to conclude next week and the artifacts get released.
david jencks
On Nov 4, 2011, at 4:47 PM, Matt Madhavan
Hello,
I would like to download Aries 0.4 binary. Where can I get a stable cut of
Aries 0.4?
Thanks
Matt
ave a blueprint release in the next
few weeks.
Tim
> Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2011 23:56:30 -0400
> Subject: Aries Blueprint 0.4?
> From: gareth.o.coll...@gmail.com
> To: user@aries.apache.org
>
> Hello,
>
> I am curious - is a release of Aries Blueprint 0.4 planned soon?
>
&
Hello,
I am curious - is a release of Aries Blueprint 0.4 planned soon?
I ask this as I have found some quirks with the current version
(0.3.1), but I know that
a lot of changes have been made since this release (from March?).
If a release of blueprint is not planned for the near future, is the
ooking at DEPENDENCIES in META-INF and the output of
>>> dependency:tree I'm sure:
>>>
>>> beat:blueprint-bundle olli$ mvn clean dependency:tree
>>> [INFO] Scanning for projects...
>>> [INFO]
>>> [INFO]
>>> ---
#x27;t
> > list them. After looking at DEPENDENCIES in META-INF and the output of
> > dependency:tree I'm sure:
> >
> > beat:blueprint-bundle olli$ mvn clean dependency:tree
> > [INFO] Scanning for projects...
> > [INFO]
> > [INFO]
> > --------
> > [INF
--
> [INFO] Building Apache Aries Blueprint Bundle 0.3.2-SNAPSHOT
> [INFO]
> ----
> [WARNING] The POM for
> org.apache.aries.proxy:org.apache.aries.proxy.impl:jar:0.4-SNAPSHOT is
> invalid, transitive d
ding Apache Aries Blueprint Bundle 0.3.2-SNAPSHOT
[INFO]
[WARNING] The POM for
org.apache.aries.proxy:org.apache.aries.proxy.impl:jar:0.4-SNAPSHOT is
invalid, transitive dependencies (if any) will not be available, enable debug
t; On 28 Jun 2011, at 22:06, Oliver Lietz wrote:
>>>>> Am Monday 27 June 2011 schrieb Alasdair Nottingham:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> hey,
>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't think there are any "plans". In t
Lietz wrote:
> >>> Am Monday 27 June 2011 schrieb Alasdair Nottingham:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> hey,
> >>>
> >>>> I don't think there are any "plans". In the past releases have been
> >>>> mo
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> hey,
>>>
>>>> I don't think there are any "plans". In the past releases have been more
>>>> "on demand".
>>>>
>>>> After the 0.3 release we decided to move to a pre-
ny "plans". In the past releases have been more
> >> "on demand".
> >>
> >> After the 0.3 release we decided to move to a pre-bundle release process
> >> so their wont be a big 0.4 release like there were previously. Some
> >> bundles
gt;>
>> After the 0.3 release we decided to move to a pre-bundle release process so
>> their wont be a big 0.4 release like there were previously. Some bundles
>> might be at 0.4 and some at 0.3.1.
>>
>> Do you need a release?
>
> a release with fixed dependenc
Am Monday 27 June 2011 schrieb Alasdair Nottingham:
> Hi,
hey,
> I don't think there are any "plans". In the past releases have been more
> "on demand".
>
> After the 0.3 release we decided to move to a pre-bundle release process so
> their wont be a
Am 28.06.2011 17:57, schrieb Jacek Laskowski:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Bengt Rodehav wrote:
Isn't what OSGi versioning (for bundles and packages) is supposed to
take care of?
Oh yes, the OSGi runtime will complain when there's a version mismatch...
But I'd really like to take care of
OK - I trust you guys...
Just need to know whether I need to update any of my other Aries projects
when I upgrade the JPA part. I'm also using Blueprint, JTA and JNDI (as most
others using JPA I guess). On the Aries web it looks like 0.3 is the latest
version of everything but in Maven central I c
Hi,
As pointed out OSGi versioning does help here. We have put the
infrastructure in place to do distributions which include multiple things
collected together. I'm not sure if we will do that here though. In general
the latest releases of things will have been tested together prior to
release.
A
Yeah, I guess you're right. I'm just a little sloppy when it comes to OSGi
versioning myself...
/Bengt
2011/6/28 Jacek Laskowski
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Bengt Rodehav wrote:
>
> > Now that you seem to release the sub projects independently (which I
> guess
> > is good since it enabl
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Bengt Rodehav wrote:
> Now that you seem to release the sub projects independently (which I guess
> is good since it enables more frequent releases) it is important to document
> what versions of the different sub projects are compatible with each other
> (and tha
Sounds perfect!
Will you only release the JPA stuff? I guess then that Aries JPA 0.4 is
compatible with 0.3 of the other Aries projects? I currently use the 0.3
versions.
Now that you seem to release the sub projects independently (which I guess
is good since it enables more frequent releases
, but now that Equinox
> 3.7 and the OSGi 4.3 API are available it should be possible for us to get
> the build into a release-able state
>
> Regards,
>
> Tim
>
>
> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:18:51 +
> Subject: Re: 0.4
> From: youne
: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:18:51 +
Subject: Re: 0.4
From: younes.ou...@gmail.com
To: user@aries.apache.org
Hello Alasdair,
I endorse the point of view of both Bengt and Harald. It will be very
interesting to release the enhancement allowing the runtime enhancer. This
feature is more 'compat
Bengt Rodehav wrote:
> Thanks for your reply Alasdair,
>
> Reading the documentation about the JPA support it seems like in 0.4, it is
> no longer necessary to list all classes in the persistence.xml. That's an
> improvement I'm really interested in which is why asked about
Thanks for your reply Alasdair,
Reading the documentation about the JPA support it seems like in 0.4, it is
no longer necessary to list all classes in the persistence.xml. That's an
improvement I'm really interested in which is why asked about the 0.4
release. I also use Karaf+Camel an
Am 27.06.2011 21:01, schrieb Alasdair Nottingham:
Do you need a release?
I've successfully tested OpenJPA enhancement at deployment time using
Aries 0.4-SNAPSHOT and an Equinox 3.7 release candidate. AFAIK, OSGi
weaving hooks are not yet supported in Aries 0.3.
Build time enhanceme
Hi,
I don't think there are any "plans". In the past releases have been more "on
demand".
After the 0.3 release we decided to move to a pre-bundle release process so
their wont be a big 0.4 release like there were previously. Some bundles
might be at 0.4 and some at 0.3.
Anyone know when Aries 0.4 is planned for?
/Bengt
29 matches
Mail list logo
