;mailto:ole...@gmail.com>]
> Sent: 11. september 2015 05:57
> To: user@bloodhound.apache.org <mailto:user@bloodhound.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Is it alive?
>
> JFTR , I am working on a private fork of Bloodhound that I use
for my
> deployme
gt;> Thank you for your replies - I will go with the standard Trac for the moment
>> then. But I will be following Bloodhound.
>>
>> /Torben
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Olemis Lang [mailto:ole...@gmail.com <mailto:ole...@gmail.com&g
:* Friday, September 11, 2015 12:52 PM
*To:* user@bloodhound.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: Is it alive?
And we went with Redmine (multi product support was a requirement).
If you don’t need multi product support, I think Trac has the
advantage that if/when Bloodhound becomes under active development
I think you’re missing my point. It already has a company behind it – Apache.
From: Vijay Varadan [mailto:vi...@axham.com]
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 12:49 AM
To: user@bloodhound.apache.org
Subject: RE: Is it alive?
+1 to the point about users being demanding.
What
tc.
>
> So, I just wanted to know if the project is still alive? Are anybody
> working actively on the project?
>
Yeah there hasn't been much activity lately. I don't have any immediate
plans or time to work on Bloodhound in the near future, but I'd be
interested to hear if any other developers will be working on it.
- Ryan
...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: 11. september 2015 05:57
> > To: user@bloodhound.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Is it alive?
> >
> > JFTR , I am working on a private fork of Bloodhound that I use for my
> > deployments . Nonetheless I've had to slow down my dev speed because I'
gt; Subject: Re: Is it alive?
>
> JFTR , I am working on a private fork of Bloodhound that I use for my
> deployments . Nonetheless I've had to slow down my dev speed because I'm
> contributing with code to the Brython project , and I've not had all the time
> I'd like these days for BH de
