Re: sstables changing in snapshots

2022-03-18 Thread Dinesh Joshi
Do you have a repro that you can share with us? If so, please file a jira and we'll take a look. > On Mar 18, 2022, at 12:15 PM, James Brown wrote: > > This in 4.0.3 after running nodetool snapshot that we're seeing sstables > change, yes. > > James Brown > Infrastructure Architect @

Re: sstables changing in snapshots

2022-03-18 Thread Bowen Song
If that's the case, it sounds like a bug to me. A SSTable file in the snapshot should never be modified by Cassandra, as that may interfere with some tools backing up data from the snapshots. On 18/03/2022 19:15, James Brown wrote: This in 4.0.3 after running |nodetool snapshot| that we're

Re: sstables changing in snapshots

2022-03-18 Thread James Brown
This in 4.0.3 after running nodetool snapshot that we're seeing sstables change, yes. James Brown Infrastructure Architect @ easypost.com On 2022-03-18 at 12:06:00, Jeff Jirsa wrote: > This is nodetool snapshot yes? 3.11 or 4.0? > > In versions prior to 3.0, sstables would be written with

Re: sstables changing in snapshots

2022-03-18 Thread Jeff Jirsa
This is nodetool snapshot yes? 3.11 or 4.0? In versions prior to 3.0, sstables would be written with -tmp- in the name, then renamed when complete, so an sstable definitely never changed once it had the final file name. With the new transaction log mechanism, we use one name and a transaction log

sstables changing in snapshots

2022-03-18 Thread James Brown
We use the boring combo of cassandra snapshots + tar to backup our cassandra nodes; every once in a while, we'll notice tar failing with the following: tar: data/addresses/addresses-eb0196100b7d11ec852b1541747d640a/snapshots/backup20220318183708/nb-167-big-Data.db: file changed as we read it I

Re: Apache archive RedHat repodata

2022-03-18 Thread Michael Shuler
On 3/18/22 02:31, Stijn Vanden Brande (External) wrote: The solution should be simply running `createrepo` after the new package is added in archive repository to have the correct repo data. You stated the issue in your initial observation. The contents of archive.a.o are an automated

Re: Gossips pending task increasing, nodes are DOWN

2022-03-18 Thread Jean Carlo
Yes, I can see. Looks like cluster got overcharged and full repair was running, we got to restart all nodes and it seems to fix the problem. We will upgrade version soon Saludos Jean Carlo "The best way to predict the future is to invent it" Alan Kay On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 5:12 PM Jeff Jirsa

Re: Apache archive RedHat repodata

2022-03-18 Thread Stijn Vanden Brande (External)
Hi Bowen, indeed, this is a work-around. However, this disables the GPG check or other yum specific configuration options. While you do offer the yum repo data to have it function as a proper repository. The solution should be simply running `createrepo` after the new package is added in