Re: Materialized views stability

2017-10-04 Thread Hannu Kröger
Ok, thanks for the info. This is what I wanted to know. Cheers, Hannu On 2 October 2017 at 18:27:16, Carlos Rolo (r...@pythian.com) wrote: I've been dealing with MV extensively, and I second Blake. MVs are not suitable for production. Unless you're ready for the pain (The out of sync is a major

Re: Materialized views stability

2017-10-02 Thread Carlos Rolo
I've been dealing with MV extensively, and I second Blake. MVs are not suitable for production. Unless you're ready for the pain (The out of sync is a major pain point), I would not go that way. Regards, Carlos Juzarte Rolo Cassandra Consultant / Datastax Certified Architect / Cassandra MVP Pyth

Re: Materialized views stability

2017-10-02 Thread Blake Eggleston
Hi Hannu, There are more than a few committers that don't think MVs are currently suitable for production use. I'm not involved with MV development, so this may not be 100% accurate, but the problems as I understand them are:  There's no way to determine if a view is out of sync with the base

Materialized views stability

2017-10-02 Thread Hannu Kröger
Hello, I have seen some discussions around Materialized Views and stability of that functionality. There are some open issues around repairs: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-13810?jql=project%20%3D%20CASSANDRA%20AND%20issuetype%20%3D%20Bug%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20