Similarly, should we send multiple SELECT requests or a single one with a
SELECT...IN ?
On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 11:27 AM, Sotirios Delimanolis
sotodel...@yahoo.com wrote:
Will this eventually they will all go through behavior apply to the IN? How
is this query written to the
Multiple async requests. IN() is a performance nightmare unless you're
querying against a single partition key.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:09 PM Sotirios Delimanolis sotodel...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Similarly, should we send multiple SELECT requests or a single one with a
SELECT...IN ?
On
Batches don't work like that. It's possible for some to succeed, and
later, the rest will. Atomic is the incorrect word to use, it's more like
eventually they will all go through.
Do not use IN(), use a whole bunch of prepared statements asynchronously.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 9:26 AM Sotirios
Will this eventually they will all go through behavior apply to the IN? How
is this query written to the commitlog?
Do you mean prepare a query likeDELETE FROM MastersOfTheUniverse WHERE
mastersID = ?;and execute it asynchronously 3000 times or add 3000 of these
DELETE (bound) prepared
