Thanks all, I really appreciate the input.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Jonathan Haddad wrote:
> Yes... I agree with Rob here. I don't see much benchmarking required for
> versions of Cassandra that aren't actively supported by the committers.
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:52 AM Robert Co
Yes... I agree with Rob here. I don't see much benchmarking required for
versions of Cassandra that aren't actively supported by the committers.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:52 AM Robert Coli wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Andy Kruth wrote:
>
>> We are trying to decide how to proceed
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Andy Kruth wrote:
> We are trying to decide how to proceed with development and support of
> YCSB bindings for older versions of Cassandra, namely Cassandra 7, 8, and
> 10.
>
> We would like to continue dev and support on these if the use of those
> versions of Ca
I assume you mean Cassandra 0.7, 0.8, and 1.0? I think most users are on
2.x now, but I don't have any stats.
--
Michael Mior
michael.m...@gmail.com
2015-12-15 9:28 GMT-05:00 Andy Kruth :
> We are trying to decide how to proceed with development and support of
> YCSB bindings for older versions
