What are the reasons for holding off on 2.1.x at this point?

2015-03-09 Thread Jacob Rhoden
I notice some of the discussion about rolling back and avoiding upgrading. I wonder if people can elaborate on their pain points?  We are in a situation where there are some use cases we wish to implement that appear to be much simpler to implement using indexed sets. So it has me wondering

Re: What are the reasons for holding off on 2.1.x at this point?

2015-03-09 Thread graham sanderson
2.1.3 has a few memory leaks/issues, resource management race conditions. That is horribly vague, however looking at some of the fixes in 2.1.4 I’d be tempted to wait on that. 2.1.3 is fine for testing though. On Mar 9, 2015, at 6:42 PM, Jacob Rhoden jacob.rho...@me.com wrote: I notice

Re: What are the reasons for holding off on 2.1.x at this point?

2015-03-09 Thread Robert Coli
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Jacob Rhoden jacob.rho...@me.com wrote: I notice some of the discussion about rolling back and avoiding upgrading. I wonder if people can elaborate on their pain points? We are in a situation where there are some use cases we wish to implement that appear to