Re: 3.0.15 or 3.11.1

2018-01-09 Thread Nate McCall
> > Can you please provide dome JIRAs for superior fixes and performance > improvements which are present in 3.11.1 but are missing in 3.0.15. > > For the security conscious, CASSANDRA-11695 allows you to use Cassandra's authentication and authorization to lock down JMX/nodetool access instead of

Re: 3.0.15 or 3.11.1

2018-01-09 Thread shalom sagges
Thanks a lot for the info! Much appreciated. On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 2:33 AM, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > >> Can you please provide dome JIRAs for superior fixes and performance >> improvements which are present in 3.11.1 but are missing in 3.0.15. >> > > > Some that come

Re: 3.0.15 or 3.11.1

2018-01-08 Thread Mick Semb Wever
> > Can you please provide dome JIRAs for superior fixes and performance > improvements which are present in 3.11.1 but are missing in 3.0.15. > Some that come to mind… Cassandra Storage Engine: CASSANDRA-12269, CASSANDRA-12731 Streaming and Compaction: CASSANDRA-11206, CASSANDRA-9766,

Re: 3.0.15 or 3.11.1

2018-01-07 Thread shini gupta
at 2:33 AM, shalom sagges <shalomsag...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks Guys! > > Sorry for the late reply. > I'm interested in TWCS where I understand is more stable in 3.11.1 than in > 3.0.15, tombstone compaction and slow logs. > > I don't plan to use MVs and SASI in the n

Re: 3.0.15 or 3.11.1

2018-01-07 Thread Jon Haddad
ttp://thelastpickle.com/blog/2017/01/10/twcs-part2.html> > On Jan 7, 2018, at 2:33 AM, shalom sagges <shalomsag...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks Guys! > > Sorry for the late reply. > I'm interested in TWCS where I understand is more stable in 3.11.1 than in > 3.0.

Re: 3.0.15 or 3.11.1

2018-01-07 Thread shalom sagges
Thanks Guys! Sorry for the late reply. I'm interested in TWCS where I understand is more stable in 3.11.1 than in 3.0.15, tombstone compaction and slow logs. I don't plan to use MVs and SASI in the near future, as I understand are not Production ready. Is it okay to use the above features

Re: 3.0.15 or 3.11.1

2018-01-03 Thread Mick Semb Wever
> > I want to upgrade from 2.x to 3.x. > > I can definitely use the features in 3.11.1 but it's not a must. > So my question is, is 3.11.1 stable and suitable for Production compared > to 3.0.15? > Use 3.11.1 and don't use any 3.0.x or 3.x features. 3.11.1 is effectively t

RE: [EXTERNAL] 3.0.15 or 3.11.1

2018-01-02 Thread Durity, Sean R
on what others have experienced, not my own experience. Sean Durity From: shalom sagges [mailto:shalomsag...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2018 3:15 AM To: user@cassandra.apache.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] 3.0.15 or 3.11.1 Hi All, I want to upgrade from 2.x to 3.x. I can definitely use

3.0.15 or 3.11.1

2018-01-02 Thread shalom sagges
Hi All, I want to upgrade from 2.x to 3.x. I can definitely use the features in 3.11.1 but it's not a must. So my question is, is 3.11.1 stable and suitable for Production compared to 3.0.15? Thanks!