Yamada [mailto:mogwa...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2018 1:10 AM
> To: user@cassandra.apache.org
> Subject: Re: LWT on data mutated by non-LWT operation is valid ?
>
> Thank you JH.
> But, it's still a little bit unclear to me
>
> Let me clarify the question.
>
-Original Message-
From: Hiroyuki Yamada [mailto:mogwa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2018 1:10 AM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: LWT on data mutated by non-LWT operation is valid ?
Thank you JH.
But, it's still a little bit unclear to me
Let me clarify the question
ache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14304
>
>
> Regards,
>
> JH
>
>
> From: Hiroyuki Yamada <mogwa...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2018 4:38:15 AM
> To: user@cassandra.apache.org
> Subject: LWT on data mutated by non-LWT operatio
, March 24, 2018 4:38:15 AM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: LWT on data mutated by non-LWT operation is valid ?
Hi all,
I have some question about LWT.
I am wondering if LWT works only for data mutated by LWT or not.
In other words, doing LWT on some data mutated by non-LWT operations
is
Hi all,
I have some question about LWT.
I am wondering if LWT works only for data mutated by LWT or not.
In other words, doing LWT on some data mutated by non-LWT operations
is still valid ?
I don't fully understand how system.paxos table works in LWT,
but row_key should be empty for a data
