We evaluated both 3.0.x and 3.11.x. +1 for 3.11.2 as we faced major performance
issues with 3.0.x. We have NOT evaluated new features on 3.11.x.
Anuj
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 at 19:35, Alain RODRIGUEZ wrote:
Hello Tom,
It's good to hear this
Hello,
Our 5 cents. Either 3.0.16 or 3.11.x
We are really happy with the way 3.11.1/2 is behaving.
We still have a lot of really well behaving Clusters in 2.1/2.2 latest.
Regards,
Carlos Juzarte Rolo
Cassandra Consultant / Datastax Certified Architect / Cassandra MVP
Pythian - Love your data
Hello Tom,
It's good to hear this kind of feedbacks,
Thanks for sharing.
3.11.x seems to get more love from the community wrt patches. This is why
> I'd recommend 3.11.x for new projects.
>
I also agree with this analysis.
Stay away from any of the 2.x series, they're going EOL soonish and
We run on the order of a thousand Cassandra nodes in production. Most of
that is 3.0.16, but new clusters are defaulting to 3.11.2 and some older
clusters have been upgraded to it as well.
All of the bugs I encountered in 3.11.x were also seen in 3.0.x, but 3.11.x
seems to get more love from the
I’d personally be willing to run 3.0.16
3.11.2 or 3 whatever should also be similar, but I haven’t personally tested it
at any meaningful scale
--
Jeff Jirsa
> On Mar 2, 2018, at 2:37 PM, Kenneth Brotman
> wrote:
>
> Seems like a lot of people are running
Hello Kenneth,
We've been recommending 3.11.2 for new projects since it comes with quite a
few performance improvements and bug fixes not available in 3.0.16.
Upgrading to newer versions is taken on a case-by-case basis, but if 2.x is
pretty important to the customer, 2.2.12 is our go-to
Seems like a lot of people are running old versions of Cassandra. What is
the best version, most reliable stable version to use now?
Kenneth Brotman