On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 10:02:29PM +, Italo Maia wrote:
Oh my. Fair enough. Here is a sample data.
http://pastebin.com/MkQrE8d2
See below.
The values of a, b and c for this sample data, for best fitting, are:
A: 1.0782 B: 0.4583 C: 0.0166
When everything is working, I'll
I will be out of the office starting 07/06/2012 and will not return until
07/09/2012.
I will respond to your message when I return. Please contact Vinothkumar
Alagesan/Vijayan Periasamy for Diagnostics related efforts.
Please contact Albert J Stark/Kannan Perichiappan for any esclations.
Hi Neil,
apologize for the late reply - the Digester relies on BeanUtils to
perform text to Java object unmarshalling, so for your enumeration(s)
type you have to plug the needed converter.
Have a look at Data Type Conversions[1] to understand how to convert
the extracted XML body text to
A full working example attached.
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 11:53:05 +0200
From: gil...@harfang.homelinux.org
To: user@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: [math]
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 10:02:29PM +, Italo Maia wrote:
Oh my. Fair enough. Here is a sample data.
a, b and c for this example should be: A: 1.0782 B: 0.4583 C: 0.0166
From: italom...@hotmail.com
To: user@commons.apache.org
Subject: RE: [math]
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 16:24:21 +
A full working example attached.
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 11:53:05 +0200
From:
On 5 July 2012 20:12, Jordan Grant jordangr...@carfax.com wrote:
I have written two implementations using commons-exec that are functionally
the same in Windows, but our production environment is in OpenVMS. I am
curious as to whether one approach or the other is preferred for portability.
Thank you for the tip, I will implement that soon. I guess the root of my
question is, is there any downside to using the more concise DefaultExecutor
approach?
-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 12:19 PM
To: Commons Users List
Subject:
Hi.
If you are using the function
a * Math.pow(t, b) * Math.exp(-c * t)
the gradient is:
{ Math.pow(t, b) * Math.exp(-c * t),
a * Math.log(t) * Math.pow(t, b) * Math.exp(-c * t),
-a * t Math.pow(t, b) * Math.exp(-c * t) }
// No idea what goes here. Nothing seems to work.
Well,
Hummm, so my assumption that my previous values for a, b and c were the best
are wrong. I calculated the resid and it is really smaller. Real thanks for
that!
Any tips on calculating the r-squared?
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 22:05:26 +0200
From: gil...@harfang.homelinux.org
To:
On 6 July 2012 20:09, Jordan Grant jordangr...@carfax.com wrote:
Thank you for the tip, I will implement that soon. I guess the root of my
question is, is there any downside to using the more concise DefaultExecutor
approach?
If you want to be sure, check what the code does.
This is open
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 09:39:30PM +, Italo Maia wrote:
Hummm, so my assumption that my previous values for a, b and c were the best
are wrong. I calculated the resid and it is really smaller. Real thanks for
that!
I wouldn't take the difference too seriously, given that the data are
Had this to calculate the rsquared:
OLSMultipleLinearRegression regression = new OLSMultipleLinearRegression();
regression.newSampleData(curve_totals, data);
System.out.println(rsquared: + regression.calculateRSquared());
Where curve_totals is the value calculated with Fnc.fnc and the
12 matches
Mail list logo
