On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 8:13 PM, kennardconsulting
rich...@kennardconsulting.com wrote:
I was wondering if it was possible to retain this goodness whilst changing
to a different getter/setter naming convention? Instead of 'getFoo()',
'setFoo(x)', I'd like to use 'foo()' and 'foo_$eq(x)' which is
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:13 PM, kennardconsulting
rich...@kennardconsulting.com wrote:
Dear All,
I am enjoying using Commons BeanUtils with all its converters and
'foo.bar.baz' path notation goodness.
I was wondering if it was possible to retain this goodness whilst changing
to a
Okay, thanks Niall. Will do.
Regards,
Richard.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-BeanUtils--Possible-to-hook-in-a-different-getter-setter-naming-convention--tp21259922p21284097.html
Sent from the Commons - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com