Re: [BeanUtils] Possible to hook in a different getter/setter naming convention?

2009-01-21 Thread Michael Nascimento
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 8:13 PM, kennardconsulting rich...@kennardconsulting.com wrote: I was wondering if it was possible to retain this goodness whilst changing to a different getter/setter naming convention? Instead of 'getFoo()', 'setFoo(x)', I'd like to use 'foo()' and 'foo_$eq(x)' which is

Re: [BeanUtils] Possible to hook in a different getter/setter naming convention?

2009-01-04 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:13 PM, kennardconsulting rich...@kennardconsulting.com wrote: Dear All, I am enjoying using Commons BeanUtils with all its converters and 'foo.bar.baz' path notation goodness. I was wondering if it was possible to retain this goodness whilst changing to a

Re: [BeanUtils] Possible to hook in a different getter/setter naming convention?

2009-01-04 Thread kennardconsulting
Okay, thanks Niall. Will do. Regards, Richard. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-BeanUtils--Possible-to-hook-in-a-different-getter-setter-naming-convention--tp21259922p21284097.html Sent from the Commons - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com