Re: scxml: planning and versions

2014-04-23 Thread Ate Douma
Hi Rinke, On 19-04-14 22:15, R.C. Hoekstra wrote: Hi Ate, Woonsan, thanks for the long answer; sorry for my late reply, I was away for a few days. Good to hear you are really interested in our use-case, Ate. You're asking what specific specification features we will be using now, or in the

RE: Re: scxml: planning and versions

2014-04-19 Thread R.C. Hoekstra
Hi Ate, Woonsan, thanks for the long answer; sorry for my late reply, I was away for a few days. Good to hear you are really interested in our use-case, Ate. You're asking what specific specification features we will be using now, or in the near future. To be honest; I don't know yet. At

scxml: planning and versions

2014-04-15 Thread R.C. Hoekstra
Hi all @ commons scxml, We're a university team of scientists working on multi agent simulations of tropical diseases for a world health organization project. A disease can be considered as a state machine, with the patient going through various states and transitions, each triggering new

Re: scxml: planning and versions

2014-04-15 Thread Woonsan Ko
Hi Rinke, Welcome! And that's great to hear about your project! The roadmap is described here: http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-scxml/roadmap.htmlI would recommend you to use 2.0-M1 instead because the milestones (M0 and M1) were actually done based on the J6 branch and included proper

Re: scxml: planning and versions

2014-04-15 Thread Ate Douma
Hi Rinke, On 15-04-14 11:29, R.C. Hoekstra wrote: Hi all @ commons scxml, We're a university team of scientists working on multi agent simulations of tropical diseases for a world health organization project. A disease can be considered as a state machine, with the patient going through