Re: FlinkCEP latency/throughput

2017-05-19 Thread Dawid Wysakowicz
! > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://apache-flink-user- > mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/FlinkCEP-latency-throughput- > tp13170p13221.html > Sent from the Apache Flink User Mailing List archive. mailing list archive > at Nabble.com. >

Re: FlinkCEP latency/throughput

2017-05-17 Thread Dean Wampler
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Kostas Kloudas < k.klou...@data-artisans.com> wrote: > Hello Alfred, > > As a first general remark, Flink was not optimized for multicore > deployments > but rather for distributed environments. This implies overheads > (serialization, > communication etc), when

Re: FlinkCEP latency/throughput

2017-05-17 Thread Kostas Kloudas
Hello Alfred, As a first general remark, Flink was not optimized for multicore deployments but rather for distributed environments. This implies overheads (serialization, communication etc), when compared to libs optimized for multicores. So there may be libraries that are better optimized for

FlinkCEP latency/throughput

2017-05-16 Thread Sonex
of the dataset by the time taken to complete the experiment. -- View this message in context: http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/FlinkCEP-latency-throughput-tp13170.html Sent from the Apache Flink User Mailing List archive. mailing list archive at Nabble.com.