Re: Optimizations not performed - please confirm

2016-06-29 Thread Fabian Hueske
Yes, that was my fault. I'm used to auto reply-all on my desktop machine, but my phone just did a simple reply. Sorry for the confusion, Fabian 2016-06-29 19:24 GMT+02:00 Ovidiu-Cristian MARCU < ovidiu-cristian.ma...@inria.fr>: > Thank you, Aljoscha! > I received a similar update from Fabian, o

Re: Optimizations not performed - please confirm

2016-06-29 Thread Ovidiu-Cristian MARCU
Thank you, Aljoscha! I received a similar update from Fabian, only now I see the user list was not in CC. Fabian::The optimizer hasn’t been touched (except for bugfixes and new operators) for quite some time. These limitations are still present and I don’t expect them to be removed anytime soon

Re: Optimizations not performed - please confirm

2016-06-29 Thread Aljoscha Krettek
Hi, I think this document is still up-to-date since not much was done in these parts of the code for the 1.0 release and after that. Maybe Timo can give some insights into what optimizations are done in the Table API/SQL that will be be released in an updated version in 1.1. Cheers, Aljoscha +Ti

Optimizations not performed - please confirm

2016-06-28 Thread Ovidiu-Cristian MARCU
Hi, The optimizer internals described in this document [1] are probably not up-to-date. Can you please confirm if this is still valid: “The following optimizations are not performed Join reordering (or operator reordering in general): Joins / Filters / Reducers are not re-ordered in Flink. This