Re: [SUGGESTION] Stack Overflow Documentation for Apache Flink

2016-09-05 Thread Vishnu Viswanath
Hi, This is my understanding of SO Documentation: 1. Any one in the community can contribute, others can validate and improve 2. Users can request a topic 3. As Max mentioned, the documentation is more example oriented and it doesn't have to be as comprehensive as the Flink's primary

Re: [SUGGESTION] Stack Overflow Documentation for Apache Flink

2016-09-05 Thread Matthias J. Sax
I voted. It's live now. The advance of SO documentation is also, that people not familiar with Apache might do some documentation (but would never open a PR). Of course, as community, we should put the focus on web page docs. But having something additional can't hurt. From my experience, it is

Re: [SUGGESTION] Stack Overflow Documentation for Apache Flink

2016-09-05 Thread Fabian Hueske
Thanks for the suggestion Vishnu! Stackoverflow documentation looks great. I like the easy contribution and versioning features. However, I am a bit skeptical. IMO, Flink's primary documentation must be hosted by Apache. Out-sourcing such an important aspect of a project to an external service is

Re: [SUGGESTION] Stack Overflow Documentation for Apache Flink

2016-09-05 Thread Maximilian Michels
Hi! This looks neat. Let's try it out. I just voted. Cheers, Max On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Vishnu Viswanath wrote: > Hi All, > > Why don't we make use of Stackoverflow's new documentation feature to do > some documentation of Apache Flink. > > To start, at