The two pull requests do not go all the way, unfortunately. They cover only
the runtime, the API integration part is missing still, unfortunately...
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Maximilian Michels m...@apache.org wrote:
You could do that but you might run into merge conflicts. Also keep in
Thanks.
Yes, I got that.
Cheers
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Maximilian Michels m...@apache.org wrote:
I mentioned that. @Max: you should only try it out if you want to
experiment/work with the changes.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Stephan Ewen se...@apache.org wrote:
The two pull
So it is up to debate how the support for resuming from intermediate
results will look like. - What's the current state of that debate?
Since there is no support for nested iterations that I know of, the debate
how intermediate results are integrated has not started yet.
Intermediate results
Thanks!
Ok, cool. If I would like to test it, I just need to merge those two pull
requests into my current branch?
Cheers,
Max
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Maximilian Michels m...@apache.org wrote:
Now that makes more sense :) I thought by nested iterations you meant
iterations in Flink
You could do that but you might run into merge conflicts. Also keep in mind
that it is work in progress :)
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Maximilian Alber
alber.maximil...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks!
Ok, cool. If I would like to test it, I just need to merge those two pull
requests into my
Hi Flinksters,
as far as I know, there is still no support for nested iterations planned.
Am I right?
So my question is how such use cases should be handled in the future.
More specific: when pinning/caching will be available, you suggest to use
that feature and program in Spark style? Or is
