That is the source for the 1.x plugin -- I'm sure it would need a
little work to get running under 2.x, but it's in the sandbox so
people can work on it.
Thanks,
Aaron
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 5:32 PM, jklcom99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can some one tell me if the quartz plugin from this
It's curious that, from the error, it appears to be looking for the
security realm in the OpenEJB class loader (which I guess is receiving
the remote call) instead of the application's class loader. Perhaps
the context class loader should be set by e.g.
EjbDaemon.processAuthRequest?
Thanks,
On 7/18/07, becky smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Paul. I think that the problem is occurring because the config.ser
file isn't up-to-date with the new dependencies..
If so (and it sounds plausible) then you'll need to add the
dependencies to the plan you use to deploy the thing
/18/07, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/18/07, becky smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Paul. I think that the problem is occurring because the
config.ser
file isn't up-to-date with the new dependencies..
If so (and it sounds plausible) then you'll need to add the
dependencies
On 4/26/07, Arinté [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If geronimo supports JSP 2.1/Servlet 2.5 shouldn't this ${test.name} show
the proper value, right now it is showing blank instead of the name:
titleTitle? ${test.name}/title
I think that means it's working. If it didn't work, I'd expect you to
see
There is some built-in encryption available. My recollection was that
the server tried to apply it to settings with password in the name,
but it may have changed in 1.2-beta.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 2/22/07, Aman Nanner/MxI Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have noticed that
On 2/22/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't found the code that does this, but I think that it encrypts
config.xml rather than any plans. I could be very wrong although
since plans aren't needed at runtime I can't see how encryption could
be applied to them.
I think it's in
Can you create a Jira issue to investigate that approach? I'm not
sure whether it would work but it sounds like it's worth following up
on. If you can attach a small example that demonstrates the problem,
that would be great too. (If nothing else, maybe we could just try
the repackaging
In the scenario you're describing, your application.xml should not
have an alt-dd element. The alt-dd should only go in your
geronimo-application.xml. (The one in application.xml points to a
separate J2EE deployment descriptor, whereas the one in
geronimo-application.xml points to a separate
You can look at var/config/config.xml, and see if there's an entry in
there for the application. If so you could remove it or add
load=false, but it sounds like maybe there's not an entry?
You can also find the files for the application in geronimo/repository
(in a subdirectory based on the
So JSR-88 has targets and modules, and we originally planned for a
target to be a config store, so if you gave it a module and specified
a target, it would go into only the listed config store(s).
Originally, that was broken because the deployer GBean either did not
accept or ignored the target
The first thing to consider is that when you're writing a GBean, you
find it most convenient to deal with other GBeans. So the recommended
path would be for your GBean to locate the GBeans representing the JMS
connection factory and destination you need, and then once you have
those you can
as an argument, still didn't work. I had this working
before using both -1.1 and -1.2 in the deployment plan. It seems like
there is something simple here that I'm missing.
Aaron Mulder wrote:
That message usually means that either it can't find your deployment
plan (in which case you could try passing
I think the best way to do this is, as someone else noted, to replace
the welcome application that ships with Geronimo. The application
assigned to / will receive requests to any path that a different
application doesn't cover, and you can assign a servlet to receive all
requests and redirect to
. while a resource-env-ref is for
a JMS destination.)
Thanks,
Aaron
- Original Message
From: Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: user@geronimo.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2007 9:15:11 AM
Subject: Re: ActiveMQ Reference/Dependencies
OK, well, I'm assuming you created the queue
I think your dependency should be on activemq not activemq-broker. If
I remember right, the activemq-broker module just configures the core
ActiveMQ broker and the activemq module has the basic connection
factories and stuff.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 1/31/07, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have
192.128.1.110 http://192.128.1.110/ rly.rmp.com
http://rly.rmp.com/rly
Regards,
Simon
On 12/14/06, *Aaron Mulder* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most likely, there's still a problem with your /etc/hosts
]# telnet rly.rmp.com 1099
Trying 192.168.1.110...
Regards,
Simon
On 12/15/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once Geronimo is running, can you log into the machine and telnet
rly.rmp.com 1099 and see if you get a response? If not, that might
be the cause of the timeout.
Thanks
Most likely, there's still a problem with your /etc/hosts -- as in,
the machine's host name does not resolve to one of its actual IP
addresses. Can you provide the output of hostname and the contents
of your /etc/hosts file?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 12/14/06, problems mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
] apacheserver]# more /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost
192.128.1.110 rly.rmp.com rly
Regards,
Simon
On 12/14/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most likely, there's still a problem with your /etc/hosts -- as in,
the machine's host name does not resolve to one
On 12/13/06, Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like to import a certificate to the Geronimo-default keystore. What password
must be used to unlock the keystore?
I think it might be secret, but I've kind of forgotten.
Thanks,
Aaron
Whatever I enter, the
Do you get an error if you don't list any EJBs at all? It looks like
that technically violates the schema, but it's worth a try.
Otherwise, can you post your dummy bean implementation class? Perhaps
it's missing one of the required methods like ejbCreate?
In any case, it would be extremely
On 12/11/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sensible??? whats that mean ? :-)
I like this idea a lot, especially if I don't have to implement it :-)
Sure. I would lean toward adding an element like embedded-jar to
the EAR deployment plan. The only thing is, it would most
Are you trying to use the version of Axis bundled with Geronimo, or a
separate version that you supply yourself?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 11/28/06, Michael Moser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying since days to get an application running on Geronimo. This
application - big deal one would think
Probably there are two classes with the same name loaded from
different class loaders -- can you print Foo.class.getClassLoader()
and then the instance of foo.getClass().getClassLoader() and see what
you get for the two?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 11/15/06, sreepriya ramakrishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you find out what's at line 82?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 11/10/06, Michael Moser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Downloaded and installed geronimo 1.1.1 to WinXP box.
Start login as system/manager and click on the Information link on
left side tree-view.
I always get a JavaScript error reading:
Can you post your geronimo-web.xml? It sounds like maybe some
elements are out of order or have the wrong namespace. Or, if you
have an XML Schema validation tool or function in your IDE you might
try validating your geronimo-web.xml against the geronimo-tomcat
schema in the schemas/ directory
to:
resource-ref xmlns=http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/naming-1.1;
Thanks,
Aaron
On 11/8/06, Chris Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaron Mulder wrote:
Can you post your geronimo-web.xml? It sounds like maybe some
elements are out of order or have the wrong namespace. Or, if you
have an XML
On 11/7/06, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Sreepriya,
It is not necessary that the login module classes are put in the
repository. The classloader should be able to load the login module class.
login module class is no different from any other class that you use in your
OK, we'll have to look into the code there. It may be that this is a
bug where we use the wrong class loader to attempt to load the login
module.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 11/7/06, sreepriya ramakrishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The login module class is in the web-inf/classes
folder.
classes in a JAR in the repository. (Or try
Geronimo 1.1.x)
Thanks,
Aaron
--- Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
OK, we'll have to look into the code there. It may
be that this is a
bug where we use the wrong class loader to attempt
to load the login
module.
Thanks
On 11/7/06, sreepriya ramakrishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Aaron,,
What is an RA module?
J2EE Connector, Resource Adapter, RAR file, whatever you call it. :)
Thanks,
Aaron
--- Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 11/7/06, sreepriya ramakrishnan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
in that package.
This package will then be added to ear file?
Please let me know.
--- Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 11/7/06, sreepriya ramakrishnan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Aaron,,
What is an RA module?
J2EE Connector, Resource Adapter, RAR file, whatever
you call
Just in case you haven't already, you might try stopping and
restarting the database pool from the Installed J2EE connectors
screen, or restarting Geronimo. I don't expect this to help but...
Also, I think it's possible you might get this message if there are
*two* matching connectors (both
The problem seems to be that the GBean is defined at the EAR level but
the classes are provided at the WAR level. These are two different
class loaders. It should work, for example, if you put the GBean in
geronimo-web.xml in the WAR rather than geronimo-application.xml in
the EAR.
Thanks,
On 10/26/06, Guillaume Bilodeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes actually that was a mistake in my post, I forgot to remove all references
to my current client :) All names are correct in my code, all of them being
jdbc/insertClientNameHerePromoDS.
Any other idea?
Can you look in the database
Post to the list, and either point us to a test repository or another
place to download the plugin for test purposes (or worst case, attach
it to a Jira issue I suppose). We'll look it over and post it if
there are no issues.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 10/25/06, Michael Malgeri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It would be great if you could create a Jira issue with the sample
source, WAR, and stack trace. I believe the J2EE TCK includes some
web services tests, so it doesn't seem like things are just totally
broken, but it's certainly possible that your example is a little
different than the tests
In 1.1.1, the majority of the startup delay is in the console module.
Dain suggested it's because we precompile the JSPs, so each one
becomes a servlet, so each one becomes a GBean, and starting GBeans is
what's slow. I found it hard to believe they're *that* slow, but I
don't have any factual
On 10/19/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 19, 2006, at 1:31 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Looking at the 1.2 results: webconsole-jetty in 27s and
webconsole-tomcat in 5s That suggests GBeans aren't the whole
problem...
Actually that suggests gbeans are the problem since jetty
I need to post the latest docs. The main change is that you can
include Quartz jobs and a config file directly in a WAR or EJB JAR if
you like and the plugin will handle it. Other than that, the changes
were primarily to the build script, to target Geronimo 1.1.1, etc.
If there are additional
The Unable to create configuration for deployment message is pretty
vague. Do you get any more information or a stack trace? If so,
please post it. If not, you can try deploying with the command-line
deploy tool and using the --verbose option:
java -jar bin/deployer.jar --verbose deploy
You can use the command-line deploy tool to add new features to the
minimal installation (Little G). We've been a little delinquent in
setting up the metadata files that describe each incremental upgrade
that should be available, so your help would be appreciated in helping
us establish exactly
Is there a chance you've switched VMs? I think if you deploy under
1.4 and then run under 1.5 you can get problems like this...
Thanks,
Aaron
On 10/11/06, Clough, Ray C PWR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote a simple demo WS which deployed fine under Geronimo 1.0. I recently
One way to go would be to remove the entire dep:environment block,
and move the hidden-classes elements inside the environment block
and combine the two into one hidden-classes with two filter
children... Something like:
web-app ...
environment
moduleId ...
hidden-classes
filter
and make progress on solving that
issue then would you mind sharing your results with us? I think
openlaszlo is a great technology and would even make an excellent
geronimo plugin.
Best wishes,
Paul
On 10/7/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One way to go would be to remove the entire
It sounds like you edited config.xml and then stopped and started
Geroinmo. Geronimo rewrites config.xml while it's running, so you
should stop Geronimo, edit the file, and then start Geronimo again.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 10/6/06, Robert McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To Whom It May
(Session.java:336)
Im testing this on a fresh install of Geronimo 1.1.1
Anny suggestions ?
Cheers
Peter
Aaron Mulder skrev:
Does your localhost have a mail server running? Or are you trying to
send through a remote SMTP server? Is the mail server open or do you
need to authenticate
Rick, I'm confused about the syntax you posted. I think there are
several problems:
* It looks like something out of config.xml, which does not work in a
deployment plan
* It uses a groupId of org.apache.geronimo.* which is not valid for
Geronimo 1.1.x.
* You're claiming that something can be
Does your localhost have a mail server running? Or are you trying to
send through a remote SMTP server? Is the mail server open or do you
need to authenticate to it?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 9/29/06, Peter Petersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all!
I quite new to Geronimo (using 1.1.1) and have
that holds the thread pool (which I think is
in geronimo/rmi-naming/1.1/car). If that doesn't work, you may just
have to upgrade.
Thanks,
Aaron
Aaron Mulder skrev:
There was a bug fixed in Geronimo 1.1.1 that definitely seems related
-- but I wasn't aware that it struck if you just ran the server
On 9/28/06, Peter Petersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I uppgraded to 1.1.1 and found this information wile installing the
plugin http://gplugins.sourceforge.net/
OK, you got it working then?
Thanks,
Aaron
Peter Petersson skrev:
Hi all
Im trying to set a database resource-ref in the
What kind of application or components are you using, and what sort of
performance is important to you?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 9/28/06, Jeffrey Faelnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We are currently supporting a client evaluating Geronimo. Can anybody
direct me to a list of settings I can
Can you post your openejb-jar.xml (preferably once)?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 9/22/06, mahu2425 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I'm trying to migrate an application from Geronimo 1.0 to Geronimo 1.1.1 (Jetty
version), but I fail deploying the ear file.
My application consists of a single
Could it be that the Derby database used for persistence is slowing
down the ActiveMQ server? Have you tried pointing ActiveMQ to a
different database for persistence (or leaving the journal but
disabling the database persistence)?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 9/22/06, avin98 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you say a little more about what you're trying to do? For
example, why are you accessing JAAS via a Servlet Filter instead of
just using J2EE security? It is possible for you to access Geronimo
security features from a filter but the best way may depend on what
you're trying to accomplish.
You can deploy new portlets as WARs. But in order for the portal to
include them, you have to use the hacky GBean that updates the portal
config files, and then either hit a hand-crafted URL or restart the
server to make the console notice. The main problem is that the
console isn't very happy
Since we have multi-parent class loaders, it may be that there's more
than one path to the offending server-level JAR.
For example, if you want to make commons-logging hidden, and you put
the hidden-classes at the EAR level, but the WAR has a dependency on a
database pool, then the WAR could
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron
Mulder
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 12:30 PM
To: user@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Classloader Hierarchy and hidden-classes
Since we have multi-parent class loaders, it may be that there's more
than one path to the offending server
/
/single-pool
/connectionmanager
/connectiondefinition-instance
/connection-definition
/outbound-resourceadapter
/resourceadapter
/connector
Aaron Mulder wrote:
Can you
Can you post your openejb-jar.xml?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 9/1/06, Arunanthisivam Vimalathithen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to deploy an EAR containing MDB I have deployed a JMS resource
(ActiveMQ RAR) seperately. But when I deploy the MDB (parentId in
openejb-jar.xml for MDB
There's a bit here:
http://chariotsolutions.com/geronimo/geronimo-1.1/elements-classloaders.html
Basically, every module except an EAR gets a single class loader. Any
JAR dependencies are added to that class loader. Any module
dependencies have their class loaders added as parents to that
On 8/28/06, raxpl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
answer was in apache reverse proxy bit of the admin docs (yes it is a
security risk if left open...)
It's not necessarily a security risk... If you change the default
administrator account and access the console via HTTPS, it should be
as secure as
On 8/28/06, Alex Aisinzon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kanchana
I thank you for your feedback.
Unfortunately, I have not had conclusive information from the information
you pointed me to:
·I have not been able to conclude from the general Geronimo doc if
different applications run within
On 8/28/06, raxpl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks for getting back...
not sure about the it should be as secure as any other web application -
you might be right, but
just exposing a console appears to me risky...any cracker can reach it to
try and crack the password using standard techniques
of its content to any other person.
Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08/22/2006 19:22
Please respond to
user@geronimo.apache.org
To user@geronimo.apache.org
cc
Subject Re: Deployment Question for Geronimo 1.1
Geronimo doesn't have any special handling
You can find all the schemas (and HTTP URLs for them) here:
http://geronimo.apache.org/schemas.html
Thanks,
Aaron
On 8/23/06, Lance Bader [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Consider the name spaces used for deployment plans. For example,
web-app
OK, well, you can list something like APP-INF/lib/foo.jar in the
manifest entry if you still want the JARs in APP-INF/lib, but I'm glad
to hear you've got it working. :)
Thanks,
Aaron
On 8/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The application was successfully deployed.
The
Can you post your geronimo-ra.xml, ejb-jar.xml, and openejb-jar.xml?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 8/22/06, Sunny Saxena [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have an EAR which contains a connector module and an EJB. This worked fine
in 1.0. Now while migrating to 1.1, we put the geronimo-ra.xml file in the
I think you should remove the module lines in there -- I saw at least two.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 8/22/06, Wolff, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm having a problem deploying an LDAP realm to geronimo 1.1. At the
end of the message is the XML file that I'm using (with a few of the
Geronimo doesn't have any special handling for APP-INF/lib. How are
you attempting to get the stuff in there on the application's class
path?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 8/22/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought I didn't need any of the geronimo specific XML files unless I'm
Krishnakumar
On 8/11/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I have to contradict Kanchana -- you don't want to deploy
the RAR at this stage. The better way to go is to use the Common
Libs screen in the console to install the RAR into the repository.
I'm assuming that we're talking
On 8/13/06, Chad Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When does Geronimo plan to become Java EE 5 compliant? I saw that Aaron is
writing the book
Apache Geronimo: Java EE 5 Development and Deployment slated for release
in November of 2006, so this must mean that it will be compliant soon.
Actually,
Actually, I have to contradict Kanchana -- you don't want to deploy
the RAR at this stage. The better way to go is to use the Common
Libs screen in the console to install the RAR into the repository.
I'm assuming that we're talking about Geronimo 1.1 here.
The original problem was probably
If there is a J2EE Connector for OpenJMS, we should be able to help
you set this up. The easiest way would be if you run an OpenJMS
server outside of Geronimo, and Geronimo just talks to it, rather than
if you run the OpenJMS server within Geronimo.
If you want to run the OpenJMS server inside
On 8/4/06, Philipp Noggler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would prefer doing it that way with the server running outside of
geronimo. but I'm not sure if there is a J2EE connector already
installed on my geronimo. If not, where can I get that for openJMS? or
is a connector that .jar that you
What RAR are you using? Can you give me a URL?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 8/4/06, Philipp Noggler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaron Mulder schrieb:
On 8/4/06, Philipp Noggler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would prefer doing it that way with the server running outside of
geronimo. but I'm not sure
On 8/4/06, Philipp Noggler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using that .rar from that url:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/Integrating+A+Third+Party+JMS+Provider?showComments=false
I have to warn you the RAR on that page should be used for experiments
only. It is
On 8/4/06, Philipp Noggler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, thanks fpr this advice...there is a http connector from openJMS,
http://openjms.sourceforge.net/config/http.html
but i don't kwno if this will work! do you think this will work?
OK, so I looked through their page, and I don't think they
On 8/4/06, Philipp Noggler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally I got the server running...thanks again for your patience and
your help! but one more thing would be interesting to know...is there an
advantage if i run the openJMS server within geronimo or if I use a JMS
connector or is just a
On 8/7/06, Unger, Milan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Michael,
I possibly find the reason of my problem so just to inform others: what I have
done wrong was that I'm calling local methods of the same class (session bean)
so there is no chance for container to apply transaction attributes. The
WebTools and the Geronimo plugin were
doing.
Thanks again for your help,
Gaston
On 8/6/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All right, this is just scratching the surface, but...
For Geronimo 1.1...
On the machine that the web app is running on, deploy a new JMS
Resource Group for ActiveMQ using the console. On the first
configuration screen, there's a URL to connect to the ActiveMQ broker,
which is set to tcp://localhost:61616 by default. Change it to
Created http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2295
On 8/7/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That definitely sounds like a bug.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 8/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo Geronimo users,
I have tried to test a simple example concerning
All right, this is just scratching the surface, but...
In order for a web application to access an EJB, you need to add an
EJB Reference to the web application for each EJB that the web
application is going to use. The EJB reference puts the EJB in the
web application's private JNDI space.
You can use the --inPlace argument to the deploy tool and pass it your
WAR directory. It will use the current location of the (packed or
unpacked) WAR for its deployment.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 8/3/06, Achim Weßling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Under Tomcat it is possible to deploy a webapp by
transaction manager
- Stateless session EJBs
- JDBC data sources
- JMS resources
- Arbitrary GBeans
Thanks,
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron
Mulder
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 3:45 PM
To: user@geronimo.apache.org
On 8/2/06, Sutton, Timothy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to deploy a Gbean with a reference to a JDBC data source via
JNDI, and the Gbean can not see the resource name in JNDI. Although if I
do this in a JSP within the same war it works fine. Does anyone have an
idea on how to resolve
LDAP is no longer included in the download distribution of Geronimo.
You need to install the Apache Directory plugin for Geronimo, which
you can do from the Plugins - Create/Install screen in the console (or
I can give you command-line instructions if that would be better for
you). It should
don't know what would need to be done to integrate it with a
transaction manager, if that's a concern, but it would be a start.)
Thanks,
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron
Mulder
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 11:02 AM
To: user
] On Behalf Of Aaron
Mulder
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 1:35 PM
To: user@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Gbean Deployment with JNDI Reference
On 8/2/06, Sutton, Timothy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have written the app as a Spring Application and the only way we
could think to deploy
under windows? The
same thing occurs if I click to Edit an existing pool.
The JDK I am using on the Linux boxes is 1.5.0_06, but I plan on
updating to test newer versions.
Dennis
On 7/31/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/31/06, Dennis Cartier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you so
)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
Could you please share your thoughts ?
Thanks
Kanchana
On 7/21/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The
dependency is wrong -- did you use the converter tool to generate
this deployment plan?
I just gave the specific syntax in a different thread
Is the situation that you have a plugin and are just trying to install
it? If so...
The normal Deploy New screen won't deploy plugins properly. You can
use the Plugin Create/Install screen or the command-line deploy tool.
More on these in a minute.
If your machine is behind a proxy, can you
that Maven creates in regular web-based
repositories. The plugin installer relies on those, particularly when
you use a dependency with no version number (meaning, take the
latest). This is the only problem I think you might have using your
local repository.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 7/31/06, Aaron Mulder
What the error? Those all look like DEBUG messages, which normally do
not indicate that anything is wrong. I don't see any WARNING or ERROR
messages.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 7/30/06, Isuru Samaraweera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bryan,
I add the log4j.properties file to the
So it looks like your application has a web service and can't find
some Axis classes. Is this a J2EE web service (using webservices.xml
and a JAX-RPC mapping file and so on) or is it a web services you've
manually created with Axis or something?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 7/21/06, mika [EMAIL
)
at
org.apache.geronimo.deployment.plugin.local.AbstractDeployCommand.doDeploy
(AbstractDeployCommand.java:106)
at
org.apache.geronimo.deployment.plugin.local.DistributeCommand.run(DistributeCommand.java:60)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
Could you please share your thoughts ?
Thanks
Kanchana
On 7/21/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED
What happens if you comment out the security constraint? I wonder if
the problem is that a URL like /SaveKey matches both the first (/*)
and the second (/SaveKey)?
If that's not it, can you post the full stack trace of the error so we
can see where it's being generated? You may need to check
It is empty and goes in the environment element. For the specific
syntax, you can see geronimo-1.1/schemas/geronimo-module-1.1.xsd (look
for environmentType).
Thanks,
Aaron
On 7/21/06, Rakesh Midha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
To isolate my Web Applications classes from other Geronimo
1 - 100 of 406 matches
Mail list logo
